President Truman's Decision To Dropping The Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

2015 Words 9 Pages
The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not nearly as black and white and some people make them out to be. In war, who is to decide who the good guys and the bad guys are? There were so many factors ands risks that President Truman had to weigh in when making this crucial decision. In the end, he decided that it would be most beneficial to his country to bomb two military and industrial centers in Japan. President Truman 's decision to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justifiable because the United States was forced to respond to the attacks on Pearl Harbor, the alternative of invading Japan would have resulted in higher death tolls from both sides, the use of brutal force such as an atomic bomb was the only way Japan was going to learn from its own brutality, and the bombs helped to end the ongoing war. Pearl Harbor, a devastating attack on not only the American Navy but also American citizens, called for a response by the Americans. In this disastrous attack, the Japanese were able to destroy twenty American ships and two hundred American …show more content…
The American people, whether they support it or not, are going to have to live with this decision. The people willingly chose Truman to be their president; therefore, they bestowed upon him a trust to make a number of difficult decisions. When looking at this topic, one has to look at the pressure of the situation, the resistance of the Japanese, and the effect that the bombs had on the war. When provided with the facts and theories, one can draw the undeniable conclusion that President Truman 's decision to drop the bombs was his best option. He considered and explored other options, but was led to believe that those options would not meet his end goal. It is the president 's job to make the best decisions for his country; therefore, President Truman 's decision to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is

Related Documents