Reasons For The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

Good Essays
The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not nearly as black and white and some people make them out to be. In war, who is to decide who the good guys and the bad guys are? There were so many factors ands risks that President Truman had to weigh in when making this crucial decision. In the end, he decided that it would be most beneficial to his country to bomb two military and industrial centers in Japan. President Truman 's decision to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justifiable because the United States was forced to respond to the attacks on Pearl Harbor, the alternative of invading Japan would have resulted in higher death tolls from both sides, the use of brutal force such as an atomic bomb was the only way Japan …show more content…
The first plane of the attack was identified by the Americans as an American aircraft; therefore, the Americans were caught completely off guard when the attack first began (Harris). The Japanese had the upper hand in this attack, and left the Americans defenseless and panicked. This situation draws similarities to the United States ' bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Since the Japanese caught the Americans off guard, it was only logically fair that the Americans would catch the Japanese off guard with the bombs. Just as the American Navy and citizens were innocently attacked, so too were the Japanese people. In a war, an attack on a country 's home does not go unnoticed and calls for a response by that …show more content…
According to an article about the pros and cons of dropping the atomic bombs, the government claimed that one reason for dropping the bombs was to instill fear into the Japanese people. The United States ' possession and usage of the bombs demonstrated their strength to not only the Japanese but also the rest of the world. A counterargument to the bombs is that great tension was created between Japan and the United States ("Pros and Cons of Dropping the Atomic Bomb"). The United States was able to scare the Japanese, thus forcing them to surrender. Although a strong tension was created between the two countries, it would not have been much different had the Americans invaded Japan and killed thousands of their people in that fashion. On top of all of that, the United States would have lost soldiers as well. Either way, the Japanese would not have stopped fighting until they were scared and battered by the bombs. The war had already been going on too long for the United States ' liking, so they did not like the idea of an invasion because of the amount of time it would

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    WWII Was Justified

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    So, if we compare this to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the US gave Japan many chances for them to surrender, and informed them about the outcome if they were to refuse. So, overall, for those who argued that Japanese endured many hardships due to the bombs, it did not justify their actions at Pearl Habour because that eventually led to the US to resort to the last method and this proved the bomb use was…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article states, “Had the invasion not been preempted by the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, almost all agree that the campaign would have stood as the bloodiest chapter of the Second World War, adding as much as an additional 10 million dead”. Soldiers were prepared to go into the mission, but if they had millions would be dead. Dropping the atomic bombs was a good decision to save millions of Japanese and American troops. The reason for dropping the bombs can because of the many American lives that were lost during the attack on Pearl Harbor. As a nation, America felt the right way to get back at Japan was to bomb them back but on a more massive scale.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Whether it was through the loss of loved ones or the grotesque disfiguration many experienced, the catastrophe the Japanese people suffered through cannot be justified morally by America’s incentive of winning the war. Aside from the devastating physical ramifications, the actions of President Truman also had significant political implications. The reveal of the atomic bomb to the world affected the way the rest of the word viewed warfare as well as “showed how each super power would use any tactic possible to gain an advantage over their enemy” ("The Effects of the Atomic Bomb Politically and Socially"). This ultimately changes the standards of morality during war time and leads to the rapid advancement of military technology. Because the impact of the atomic bomb was so devastating, it prompted many other nations to respond with the development of their own weapons of mass destruction.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pearl Harbor Attack Essay

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A few days later, the governors of Georgia and South Carolina did the same. Roosevelt feared a motion of censure, so he decided a gamble: the bombing of Tokyo by Jimmy Doolittle. Fletcher aircraft carriers Lexington and Hornet, the latter with B-25 bombers, bombed Tokyo, Yokosuka and Nagoya to stifle criticism. The operation was a success propaganda, but damage hardly influenced the Japanese war production. Another aspect that caused the fall of the bombs on Japan was the resolution of Yamamoto to annihilate the US aircraft carriers.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In short, America used the bombs because they had them, because they could, and because Japan was a direct enemy. During the Potsdam Conference, a radio report to the American people on August 9, 1945, President Truman states, “The bomb will shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” (Walker, 93). If the bombs were not used in the process, American troops would have eventually had to move in on Japan and attack from the ground. The result of this would have been thousands of American casualties. With the bomb, America would win WWII with the smallest number of American casualties, if any at all.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If the American’s didn’t do this, they would’ve been in a much worse situation and would raise up to surrender. 4. Conclusion To conclude, it was reasonable for America to bomb the Japanese during World War two, as there are many logical explanations. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unspeakable tragedies but despite many beliefs, the decision of the atomic bombs and the motives of the U.S leaders, have saved many of lives. The U.S was justified as the droppings of atomic bombs were a collaborative method of ending the war, and to hurry up the Japanese’s surrender.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Atomic Bomb Decision Essay

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many of Americans believed Japan would have given up after few months. By dropping the atomic bombs, the Japan’s emperor could have fought back and a brunch of Americans would have lost their lives like Japan did. “Would the dropping of the bombs end World War II” was a thought in American’s minds, but they knew there would have bad consequences at the end. Those bombs were enemy and problem; they were not the solution because that caused Americans to question Truman’s authority. In an article, Professor Aplerouitz stated that “United Stated official’s though…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The bombing of Hiroshima, Japan in 1945 proved to be a controversial ending to the Second World War. There were several reasons why the bomb was dropped, but it still remains that the main reason given to the public was to end the war. However, the US used this opportunity to initiate a sense of power over the Soviet Union in order to discourage the spread of communism. President Harry Truman spoke of this bombing at the White House to inform the American public of his reasoning for this atomic bomb, and how it will be known for much more than “the size of the enterprise, it’s secrecy, [or] its cost.”. The immense amount of destruction and devastation seen by the innocent people of Hiroshima is unbearable to come to terms with.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Discursive essay on whether the dropping of the atomic bomb was entirely justifiable The argument to whether the dropping of the atomic bomb was entirely justifiable has been quite controversial. This is due to the cause that it had negative influences on Japan however America was trying to defend their country as it has been stated that Japan most likely would not have surrendered. Though, the Japanese did suffer with casualties of their civilians and soldiers. The Americans had reasons to drop the atomic bomb. As stated previously the Americans were worried about their life and wanted to end the World War 2 by dropping the bomb.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The fact that the United States decided to drop an atomic bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan shocked many people, including U.S. citizens and the Japanese. The U.S. used a brutal force choosing the atomic bomb, as proven by the thousands of deaths caused. The U.S. knew the extent of damage it was causing by deploying the bomb, and some people still question the motives for such a ruthless choice of weaponry. The atomic bomb, however destructive and questionable, seemed to be the only sure way of ensuring “unconditional surrender.” The U.S. took matters into its own hands to ensure an end to war on its own terms. The atomic bomb was, in fact, “a clear step designated to force Japan’s unconditional surrender;” however, this statement fails…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays