Reasons For The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb

Great Essays
The world has been in war for 6 years but Germany has been defeated in Europe but the war in the Pacific is still going. Japan had quickly taken over many countries that it took the Allied forces some time to rally an army to oppose them. The attack that brought America out of their neutral state was the attack from Japan on Pearl Harbour. The major battles of the Pacific were Midway, Coral Sea, Guadalcanal, Singapore, Kokoda, Iwo Jima and Okinawa. Both sides lost a large number of soldiers and everybody wanted the war to end but nobody would back down. The dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan by America was unnecessary and America is not justified for its actions. Some may argue that it was reasonable for America to drop the bomb as they …show more content…
Japan had quickly conquered many Asian countries as they believed that they could stop Western influence coming into Asia by conquering and controlling all of Asia. Japanese soldiers followed Bushido code Kamikaze code were a moral code that included death before dishonour and defeat (history.com, 2015). Because of these codes casualties on the Japanese side were extremely high and also contributed to high losses on the opposing side. It is said this reason contributed to the dropping of the bomb if the Americans invaded the Japanese mainland casualties would go into the millions. The Japanese refused to comply to the decisions from the Potsdam Declaration as they were scared their Emperor would be put on trial as a war criminal and for a country that had been fighting so hard for several years to obey unconditional surrender, it would be a big decision that would require time. Things were looking bleak so the Japanese military was looking into surrender around May 1945 but the first Japanese supreme council meeting was on August 9th as it was then Russia had joined the War and the second Atomic bomb had just been dropped on Nagasaki (foreign policy,2015) . Even though the Japanese were running out of resources as their shipping, transport and industrial factories had been destroyed by American bombing, they still wouldn’t give up until …show more content…
The league of Nations prevented any deliberate bombing on civilians but America was not a part of the League of Nations so what they did wasn’t technically illegal. America had the technology and had been working on it for years so why shouldn’t they be allowed to use it. America had been continuously bombing Japan destroying their resources but still Japan wouldn’t surrender so America thought a very powerful atomic bomb would do the trick. America had planned for a Japan mainland invasion on November but they dropped the bomb earlier to see if they could prevent the predicted death of millions from both sides. A navigator from the plane that dropped the bomb was Dutch van Kirk, said that ‘it was not a war of our choosing. We were trying to end the war and end the killing … It was an extremely hard, deadly way to do it but in the long run it really saved

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People will always argue over whether or not Japan might have surrendered earlier but we are looking at what President Truman knew at the time. The airmen of WW2 are often overlooked for how much of a role they played. In Document E Colonel Tibbets of the Enola Gay said that “we saved more lives than we took” in regards to the bombing. Japan had industrialized very quickly but it was still stuck on the idea of the Bushido code. It was evident after Guadalcanal and Midway that Japan’s air force and their navy had been crushed.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It had appeared that the Japanese were not going to surrender the way America wanted them to. Of course a big reason why the bomb was used is that if Japan would have been invaded, the death toll could have potentially reached half a million or more instead of the hundreds of thousands that were killed by the atomic bomb. It is said that if the war had continued the amount of American lives lost could have greatly diminished the amount that was killed by the bombs. It is hard to tell what could have really happened but it is certain that if the war had continued so would the loss of…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, in response to World War II and Japan’s vicious attacks on the U.S., the United States launched the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. 80,000 people died, and sixty percent of the city was destroyed. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, in which killed 70,000 people instantaneously and many more in the following weeks. These atomic bombs resulted in pure destruction and chaos for Japan and its people. Although the atomic bombs destroyed part of Japan and took many lives with them, the dropping of the atomic bombs were justified because the U.S. aimed for the complete and utter destruction of Japan and Japan remained a major threat that needed to be eliminated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the Dropping the atomic bomb was the only correct decision for the United States because of casualties being less than what they would have if America had invaded, the brutality of Japanese towards the American POW, and the importance of intimidating Stalin. By dropping the Atomic bomb, the United States rightfully saved thousands of potential lives. After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the amount of Japanese lives lost totaled to 105,000. (Doc E)…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Hasegawa acknowledges that while the “Hiroshima bombing did not significantly change Japan’s policy, though it did inject a sense of urgency into the peace party’s initiative to end the war.” Though the use of bombs did hurt Japan, they still had the help provided from the Moscow mediation and even began the use of Kamikaze attacks. The Kamikaze attacks demonstrated that the “Japanese hard-liners” were willing to sacrifice themselves and take whatever means necessary to harm the enemy and retain their dictatorship regime. Hasegawa uses these facts to provide realistic outcomes and demonstrate that as long as Japan had leverage and the ability to keep their emperor they were going to continue with the war by whatever means…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pictures drawing human flesh seemingly melting off a body and an entire city placed in ruin are alongside a table of estimated casualties from the bombs which are said to be around 135,000 in Hiroshima and 64,000 in Nagasaki (Doc 5). The US Government's unwillingness to give any potential leeway for a response or Surrender, is only proof that they had no intention of ending the war without large casualties. There is not much proof for the atomic bombs causing the surrender of Japanese forces, since they were also harshly bombed in tokyo, where their leader was staying during the times of these attacks. An excerpt from the memoirs of General H.H. Arnold elaborates on the B-29 attacks of Tokyo and how they firstly killed many more than the atomic bombs did and secondly how the Japanese could have been persuaded by these events rather than that of the atomic bombs (Doc 7). This solidifies the overall understanding of how there were many ways that the Japanese could have surrendered from, and without the use of a second nuclear…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Japan had already been militarily defeated by June, 1945. Japan’s Air Force had been almost completely destroyed. Also, almost nothing was left of the Imperial…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The primary bomb, dropped on the city of Hiroshima on August 6 1945, brought about a loss of life of around 135,000. The second, which hit Nagasaki on August 9, killed no less than 50,000 individuals. Many people died from the atomic bomb released by the United States of America. I feel as if the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan was justified.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Apparently, the Japanese didn’t think the Hiroshima bomb was a clear enough message and still did not surrender-- this was a major mistake they made. America then, finally dropped the second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. 60,000 people died instantly. After the bombing on Nagasaki is when Japan finally got the hint to surrender.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The bombing in Japan showcased the true power of the atomic bomb. In a sense, the world became more cautious in using atomic warfare due to the horrors of its effects. If the US did not use the atomic bombs, other nations would not have as much of a sense of its power. “Since it would certainly be used in the future time,” the bombs could have been used against the US (Source 5). Therefore, using the bombs on Japan may have prevented the US from being bomb with atomic warfare.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First off, if you know nothing about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, then I will give you the history of how it all started, and then maybe you can have an easier time to decide if the US was justified. From the start of the first war in 1939 American scientist, and many of them were refugees from Europe, became highly concerned with nuclear weapons research by the Nazis. In 1940 the U.S. government made the decision to fund its own atomic weapon development program. This program also became the joint responsibility of the Office of Scientific Research and…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion, United States were right on dropping the bombs. Although hundreds of innocent Japanese lives were lost, millions of American and Japanese lives could have been killed. An article on www.militarythistorynow.com before the decision to drop the bombs, there was Operation Downfall. Operation Downfall was the mission where US soldier would storm onto Japanese homeland but never happened. The article states, “Had the invasion not been preempted by the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, almost all agree that the campaign would have stood as the bloodiest chapter of the Second World War, adding as much as an additional 10 million dead”.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nuclear attack of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justifiable. Due to the fact that the Japanese government was already in the verge of surrendering to the American government.. Also the nuclear bombing was used for several causes, one of which was to cause fear to both the Japanese and Soviet governments. Finally, the bombing of both major cities in Japan caused many deaths, which were not strategic, nor useful towards the war.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. Conclusion To conclude, it was reasonable for America to bomb the Japanese during World War two, as there are many logical explanations. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unspeakable tragedies but despite many beliefs, the decision of the atomic bombs and the motives of the U.S leaders, have saved many of lives. The U.S was justified as the droppings of atomic bombs were a collaborative method of ending the war, and to hurry up the Japanese’s surrender.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays