The Pros And Cons Of Harry Truman And The Atomic Bomb

Improved Essays
Harry Truman and the Atomic Bomb
There are many arguments on whether President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan was the right one or not. Some historians say it was completely unnecessary while others believe his decision was made to save time and lives. The past cannot be changed but personal opinions on the matter can always be changed. Whether it was the correct thing to do or not, Harry Truman had to make the biggest decision of his life when faced with dropping the bomb.
There are clearly many cons to dropping a very powerful atomic bomb on hundreds of thousands of civilians. Innocent people are not the ones who should be targeted and killed. However, Truman felt like making a statement that would be a sure fire way
…show more content…
Of course he wouldn’t want to waste such an expensive piece of work on just a demonstration but still something could have been done to show how much destruction could be caused from the atomic bomb. That isn’t the most wholesome reason to drop a highly destructive bomb but it doesn’t seem too out of the ordinary for a government official to do so. Another reason said behind the dropping of the bomb is that it was to scare the Soviet Union out of continuing the war by showing how much power America had. It is hard to tell what the actual reason behind dropping the bomb was. America wanting to show who is boss is a big reason many people think the bomb was used. This reason could very well be true; America is known for trying to be dominant on numerous occasions. Because of reasons like this, it is easy to forget the positive side to the story when faced with all the negative implications that using the bomb …show more content…
It had appeared that the Japanese were not going to surrender the way America wanted them to. Of course a big reason why the bomb was used is that if Japan would have been invaded, the death toll could have potentially reached half a million or more instead of the hundreds of thousands that were killed by the atomic bomb. It is said that if the war had continued the amount of American lives lost could have greatly diminished the amount that was killed by the bombs. It is hard to tell what could have really happened but it is certain that if the war had continued so would the loss of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion, United States were right on dropping the bombs. Although hundreds of innocent Japanese lives were lost, millions of American and Japanese lives could have been killed. An article on www.militarythistorynow.com before the decision to drop the bombs, there was Operation Downfall. Operation Downfall was the mission where US soldier would storm onto Japanese homeland but never happened. The article states, “Had the invasion not been preempted by the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, almost all agree that the campaign would have stood as the bloodiest chapter of the Second World War, adding as much as an additional 10 million dead”.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the military and industrial capacity of the country had been destroyed, Japan would not have been able to defend against the US. Within six months, the US would have been able to defeat Japan without the droppings of the atomic bombs (Szilard, Document F). Along with US invasions, the Soviet invasion of Japan would have also helped in defeating Japan. Japan was not ready for a Soviet invasion, and were not able to fight against the Soviets. Their entrance to the war, in Japanese leaders eyes, was a bigger blow than the atomic bombs.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The USSR and United States both had chances to send nuclear bombs to the other nation, but neither did. They did not because they feared what would have happened if they did. As the leaders of the two nations kept their fingers over the button to send the bombs over they kept Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the back of their minds. Imagine if the Allied powers won the war without the use of the atomic bombs. Would the cold war have been a cold war, would weapons have been used instead?…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Using the atomic bomb was rash decision to end the war before thinking of all the casualties. The United States decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan doesn 't seem to justify the ending of the war. The loss of civilian life and effect on citizens for decades after the bombing are one of main reasons why the united states should have altered their decision at the time. The United States claims to be a great super power and mitigator in times of distress however their decisions regarding the status of Japan prove…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    WWII Was Justified

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The deaths and the natures of war raises discussions of how cruel and inhumane war is, but it was the atomic bomb used to end WWII that remained controversial over the years. However, despite how many people have disagreed with the use of the nuclear weapon, it was absolutely necessary to end it. The US was reasonable for making…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon (the atomic bomb) and not used it and let a million more people die.” stated Colonel Tibbets, the pilot of the Enola Gay. (Document L) The Enola Gay was the plane that dropped the first atomic weapon on Hiroshima. The Colonel was saying that if they had not dropped that bomb, it would have killed more of their men (the Americans), which would have been morally wrong because you are supposed to do what’s best for your team or army. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were definitely a Military Necessity because as stated earlier, a minimum of a million more people would have died if they did not follow through with the bombing. They needed to protect their own soldiers first.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether it was through the loss of loved ones or the grotesque disfiguration many experienced, the catastrophe the Japanese people suffered through cannot be justified morally by America’s incentive of winning the war. Aside from the devastating physical ramifications, the actions of President Truman also had significant political implications. The reveal of the atomic bomb to the world affected the way the rest of the word viewed warfare as well as “showed how each super power would use any tactic possible to gain an advantage over their enemy” ("The Effects of the Atomic Bomb Politically and Socially"). This ultimately changes the standards of morality during war time and leads to the rapid advancement of military technology. Because the impact of the atomic bomb was so devastating, it prompted many other nations to respond with the development of their own weapons of mass destruction.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1940 's, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan ending World War Two. The bombs speedily ended the war with Japan, but not without consequences. Since conquering Japan by land took a lot of resources and manpower, it resulted in many American lives unnecessarily lost. Eager to end the war, President Harry S. Truman decided that the atomic bombs must be dropped on Japan. While it was necessary to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, dropping another atomic bomb three days later on Nagasaki was unnecessary.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is why many scientist spoke up when they heard how the bomb was being used and who it was being used against. In the being American first intended to target Germany with the atomic bomb, but when Germany surrender there was no point in dropping the bomb on them. If American would have did that, it would have made them look like a real bully. Way before the bombs were even dropped on Japan, many scientists, at the Chicago metallurgical laboratory, were against the bomb being dropped on Japan and felt like it would cause the world to be destroyed. The scientists were concerned about the dangers of nuclear power and that it would threaten civilizations.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision to use nuclear weapons The decision, made by the United States of America, to drop nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may not have been the most popular or best choice for the planet; but however, it was the choice that needed to be made to end the war in the pacific. This decision was made so that both sides would suffer the lowest number of casualties possible. The United States had a conference with Japanese leaders to attempt to bring the war to an end peacefully, however the Japanese had made it very clear to the United States and president Truman that they had no intention of abandoning the code of honor they live by and would fight until the last man. After this conference the Decision to drop…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays