• Home Page
  • Why Is Hiroshima Bombing Morally Wrong

Why Is Hiroshima Bombing Morally Wrong

Superior Essays
Show More
“It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon (the atomic bomb) and not used it and let a million more people die.” stated Colonel Tibbets, the pilot of the Enola Gay. (Document L) The Enola Gay was the plane that dropped the first atomic weapon on Hiroshima. The Colonel was saying that if they had not dropped that bomb, it would have killed more of their men (the Americans), which would have been morally wrong because you are supposed to do what’s best for your team or army. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were definitely a Military Necessity because as stated earlier, a minimum of a million more people would have died if they did not follow through with the bombing. They needed to protect their own soldiers first. …show more content…
Document G shows a picture of the Hiroshima bomb and it states that the mushroom cloud made from the bomb in ten minutes was above 60,000 feet high. A good point to look at is that the fire-bombing in Tokyo killed more people than the Hiroshima bomb. Why was there not an outcry after the Tokyo bombing? People in Japan didn’t cry out after the Tokyo bombing because they were probably already finding a better way to get revenge than the atomic bomb we had. They must’ve been planning something and had a brilliant plan to take out America. Dropping the first bomb on Japan was a very big destruction, 80,000 people died instantly from the bomb. If we wouldn’t have sent this bomb, Japan wouldn’t have taken us as serious as they shouldn’t have. America was sending this bomb as a very destructive, brutal warning. Telling them to surrender or die. Apparently, the Japanese didn’t think the Hiroshima bomb was a clear enough message and still did not surrender-- this was a major mistake they made. America then, finally dropped the second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. 60,000 people died instantly. After the bombing on Nagasaki is when Japan finally got the hint to surrender. Document I states ““…The Japanese began the war from the air at Pearl Harbor. They have been repaid many fold. And the end is not yet. With this bomb we have now added a new and revolutionary increase in destruction to supplement the growing power of our armed forces.” This message is very powerful because it is explaining that the end of the war is coming to an end, and that other armies should be scared of them because they have the atomic bomb which is more of a technological advance than any of the other countries have. After this war, America is safe for a little bit until other countries are able to make the same atomic bomb we have, and America won’t be safe anymore. It would be just like the same old days where basically every

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bombing Was Not Justifiable Essay
    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Atomic Bombing Was Not Justifiable Essay

    The nuclear attack of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justifiable. Due to the fact that the Japanese government was already in the verge of surrendering to the American government.. Also the nuclear bombing was used for several causes, one of which was to cause fear to both the Japanese and Soviet governments. Finally, the bombing of both major cities in Japan caused many deaths, which were not strategic, nor useful towards the war.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Dropping The Atomic Bomb
    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Persuasive Essay On Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    Eighty thousand citizens lost their lives immediately after the bomb hit Hiroshima. In the article, “Harry S Truman’s Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb”, an eyewitness described what it was like when the bomb struck. The witness described people with “raw skin hanging in flaps around their hips” and “women without jaws screamed incoherently for help”. Innocent women and children paid the ultimate price for the attack made by Japan. Not only did hundreds die immediately after the blast but another 60,000 died by the end of the year. The cost and harsh aftermath of bombs are the second reason why the bombs should not have been dropped. Even though the bombs were a great achievement for America, the result of the bombs was seen as a harsh punishment. A quote from the same article says, “but that experience, looking down and finding nothing left of Hiroshima. Hiroshima didn’t exist.” The result of the atomic killed on a massive scale destroyed the city along with its people. As if the first bomb was not bad enough, another bomb was dropped on another Japanese city. The development of the atomic bombs cost America billions of dollars. Many thought there were could have been different ways to get back at Japan other than spending…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Dropping The Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dropping The Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    In Document K Secretary of War Henry Stinson says clearly, “The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand Japanese… But this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative”. America had been bombing civilian and industrial cities for almost a year which alone caused many more deaths than the bombs. Also, the operation to invade the Japanese mainland would have ended in a bloodbath of millions of civilian deaths including those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Americans had already planned to bomb those industrial cities months before. It was fair for the Japanese to fear occupation but anyone could tell that the germans and the americans were some of the nicest…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Hiroshima Bombing Justified
    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Is Hiroshima Bombing Justified

    It has now been a little over seven decades since the catastrophic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unleashed and nuclear warfare was unveiled to the world. This attack took place toward the end of World War II, in which the United States dropped “Little Boy” and “Fat Man” on the Japanese, resulting in detrimental losses, and an inevitable surrender from Japan, but at what cost? The devastation that was caused not only affected Japan, but the entire world at the time. Countless lives were lost and a new type of warfare introduced. A frequent question asked is whether the course of action taken by the U.S. was justified or not. Many argue that these bombings were too severe and that America could have easily taken down…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Essay
    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Essay

    During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives. However, world war two was not a disagreement to cause destruction towards the countries. The U.S was justified in dropping atomic bombs as it was an alternative to end the war at an instance and to also prevent the death rate of civilians. This was also necessary as it was America’s desire to shorten the war if the Japanese surrendered. In addition, the USA were acting against the Japanese in…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    If the United States decided against using the atomic bomb, U.S. soldiers would have invaded Japanese islands. This operation was named Operation Downfall, and this invasion would have led to thousands of casualties. Japan was willing the literally fight to the death and President Truman knew that if we didn’t use the atomic bomb that the United States would continue to fight as long as Japan was still standing. An ironic justification for dropping the bomb is not only did it save American lives, but it also saved Japanese lives. It was predicted that if Operation Downfall took place that anywhere from 5 to 10 million Japanese casualties would have occurred. Japan’s economy was down and running out of resources, but by the U.S. dropping the bombs it ended the war and allowed Japan to rebuild its country. The atomic bomb did cause fatalities, but it saved more lives that if the war was to be…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Should We Have To Drop The Atomic Bomb Analysis
    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should We Have To Drop The Atomic Bomb Analysis

    The dropping of atomic bombs is Hiroshima and Nagasaki was one of the most catastrophic bombing is history. It resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and the destruction of more than half of the cities infrastructures. Nonetheless Harry S. Truman and his advisors saw it as the only way to lead Japan to an unconditional surrender. While this is simply the opinion of the United States Commander in Chief and his advisors, there is a lot of controversy as to if it was truly a necessity in forcing Japan to surrender and ending the war. In the “Yes” article, “The Biggest Decision: Why We Had To Drop The Atomic Bomb” by Robert James Maddox argues why dropping atomic bombs in Japan became a necessity when land invasions and the Russians’ mediation were not effective. In the “No” article, “Assessing the Roads Not Taken” by Tsuyoshi Hasegawa claims that there were less destructive alternatives that could have been taken that would have still lead to Japans’ surrender. Although both authors present very valid arguments, Hasegawa does an excellent job at presenting…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Reasons For The Atomic Bomb
    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Reasons For The Atomic Bomb

    President Truman had bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki to avoid an invasion of Japan. Previously, Japan had been subject to bombings from the American B-29s. This had already devastated the capital, Tokyo, and various other major cities. Furthermore, due to the naval blockade, food and fuel was increasingly scarce. Despite this, Japan’s leaders mobilized a large part of the population into a national militia to defend the home islands. In fact, “even after the use of the atomic bombs, the Japanese military still fought on” (Wilson Miscamble, 2014). The atomic bombs helped Emperor Hirohito realise the futility of trying to defend the home islands. Furthermore, all other viable scenarios, such as an invasion, would have resulted in much higher casualties for both the allies and Japan. If such an invasion was to occur, it “would cost 250,000 American lives” (Jason Hook, 2002). Moreover, the prisoners of war would also have been executed, as Japanese officials would have ordered it if they had been invaded. Overall, the use of the atomic bombs was justified and would be what any moral person would choose given President Truman’s…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Why Is The Atomic Bomb Not Justified
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Is The Atomic Bomb Not Justified

    You have heard two reasons why dropping the atomic bombs in Japan was not justified and unnecessary. But perhaps the most compelling reasons why dropping the bomb was not justified is that the United States was weeks or months away from Japan surrendering and the war ending before dropping the bombs and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people. As you will hear from General Mitsuru Ushijima, Japan was already losing the war. The country was surrounded by US troops, Americans controlled Japanese airspace and waterways, and US casualties in military battles were low compared to Japanese. The US commanders knew that Japan was close to surrendering as Germany had already surrendered, and Russia, another powerful military force, was…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs
    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs

    The United States of America dropping the atomic bombs on Japanese cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6th and August 9th, 1945, was a very controversial decision and the opinions as to if the attacks were justified or not differ between those living in Japan and the U.S. The U.S’s act of dropping the atomic bombs was not justified because the long lasting health effects the bombings had on the population was disastrous, Japan’s army was inevitably facing defeat, and the mass destruction caused by the attacks lead to social damages throughout Japan.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Hiroshima Bombing Dbq
    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Hiroshima Bombing Dbq

    In the document we have a scientist by the name of Karl T. Compton that after the bombing of Japan had gone to see the state of post war Japan. He was there for the main reason to see the atomic bombs effects, and to see if it should have been used in the first place. On one hand if the U.S. had not used the bombs then an invasion would to have to occur which would mean lots of casualties on both sides just to invade, and not including the take over. Aslo if the Allies had invaded and then Japan surrendered the people would not have, and they would have probably kept on fighting. Even then the atomic bombs still was a minor deterrent to some Japanese escape to the ones far from the bombed cities.…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis
    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    The two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima (Aug. 6) and Nagasaki (Aug. 9) totaled to almost 200,000 Japanese casualties (Document A). President Harry Truman decided to use this horrific weapon considered to be immoral despite other options to force Japan to surrender, ending the second world war. On June 6th, 1945, the Japanese War Council stated, “we shall -- thanks to the advantages of our terrain and the unity of our nation, prosecute the war until the bitter end” (Document C). Japan had no intentions to surrender until absolutely necessary. This statement is supported through when Japan surrendered. The use of a second atomic bomb was because Japan did not surrender after the first. This is why the option to only demonstrate the atomic bomb to Japan would not have worked (Document E). A demonstration would not have brought Japan to the bitter end like the two bombs being dropped on their cities did. The other options presented to Truman included a mainland invasion as well as a blockade combined with traditional bombing.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Hiroshima Bombing Persuasive Essay
    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hiroshima Bombing Persuasive Essay

    There is much debate about whether or not, after Pearl Harbor, the U.S. should have attacked Japan with the bombing of Hiroshima, a largely populated Japanese city. For instance, Japan had killed many U.S. troops and stolen many American lives, but was nuclear warfare the answer? On the other hand, if the U.S. had not acted out, would they have lost more lives in the long run? America made the right decision when deciding to drop the A-bomb because it saved more American lives, stopped the crisis, and ended the conflict.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb
    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

    During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb. The strongest points as to why we should not have dropped the atomic bomb are mostly related to the bomb being dropped for unjust reasons or that it was essentially a geopolitical power play. But, these ideas also contain flaws that ultimately do not create a strong case for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Argumentative Essay
    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Argumentative Essay

    Dahi makes is that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not save half a million American lives as former president Harry Truman claimed. While it is true that the bombings had devastating effects both initially and thereafter, the U.S. would have surely invaded the Japanese islands later in 1945-1946 (Stimson 385). Considering famous battles like those at Iwo Jima and Okinawa, it is easy to guess that the same death and destruction for US and Japanese soldiers would occur for several months, or even years; in fact, it was projected that major fighting would not cease until late in 1946 (Stimson 385). The looming warfare could have resulted in over one million casualties of just American troops (Stimson, 385). These projected numbers were, and still are, alarming to imagine. Millions of lives were at stake across the world, prompting President Truman to make a difficult decision: devastate two cities and kill thousands of innocent people, or risk watching millions more die in horrific…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings