There is much debate about whether or not, after Pearl Harbor, the U.S. should have attacked Japan with the bombing of Hiroshima, a largely populated Japanese city. For instance, Japan had killed many U.S. troops and stolen many American lives, but was nuclear warfare the answer? On the other hand, if the U.S. had not acted out, would they have lost more lives in the long run? America made the right decision when deciding to drop the A-bomb because it saved more American lives, stopped the crisis, and ended the conflict.
Japan had done multiple things to imply their position against the U.S. They had made threats to attack the U.S. which had the U.S. government on the fence about what they should do. After Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, this was all the reason the U.S. should need to attack Japan. Taking American lives, in what could definitely be seen as an act of war, is a very serious threat to another country. …show more content…
was not being taken seriously when it tried to make appeals to come to an appeasement. Japan had many warnings to stop what they were doing, and the U.S. gave them a lot of chances. The U.S. is the only country in all of history to use nuclear weapons toward another country. After Pearl Harbor, the U.S. needed to prove a point that they were not going to be messed around with . Many people wanted revenge on Japan at the time. Japan’s troops had a mentality that they had no intent on surrendering. Their troops would die for their country before they ever considered surrendering. If the U.S. had done nothing, other countries may have retaliated and decided they were going to do the same thing. Becoming a visible superpower is one of the best things the U.S. has ever