Persuasive Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

Improved Essays
Argumentive Essay

Was the US justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Many people have been arguing this topic for years. But were they really justified? You decide.
First off, if you know nothing about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, then I will give you the history of how it all started, and then maybe you can have an easier time to decide if the US was justified. From the start of the first war in 1939 American scientist, and many of them were refugees from Europe, became highly concerned with nuclear weapons research by the Nazis. In 1940 the U.S. government made the decision to fund its own atomic weapon development program. This program also became the joint responsibility of the Office of Scientific Research and
…show more content…
The US government chose the small town of Oak Ridge and Major General Leslie Grove to take the lead of the test site. Surprisingly there were 3 plants that were built in that valley which were, K-25, Y-12, and S-50. The K-25 plant at the time was the largest building in the world and it stretched over a whopping 44 acres. All three plants were in charge of separating the isotope uranium-235 from natural uranium which was used to make an atomic bomb.
When the US had the development of the Atomic bomb, what was next? President Harry Truman was faced with a very difficult decision. He had the magnitude to end the war with Japan once and for all, but would also unleash the world’s most horrific weapon. From four years of war the Americans and civilians were tired, but the Japanese were not backing down. An Allied demand was made for an instantaneous unconditional surrender to the leadership of Japan. The demand clearly stated that the refusal would result in total destruction, but nothing was stated about any new weapons of mass

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion what we did to the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren’t morally right, but were necessary. It’s hard to give an unbiased opinion on this topic because I am a proud American so I am very opinionated on the subject. I think that the decision to drop the bombs was the right one even though so many people died because of it. I believe it was the right decision because it saved thousands of american soldiers in which we would have lost if we would have tried a full on invasion on Japan to get them to surrender. I think that if we knew all the aftermath it would’ve caused with the radiation and severe pollution we put in their water and food sources, that the decision to drop the bombs wouldn 't have been made as quickly as it was.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Was the United States justified or unjustified for dropping the bomb on the Japanese? There are many arguments, point of views and sides to this topic but I personally think that the US was justified for dropping the bomb on Japan. I think this because Japan refused to surrender, the war ended faster; and Japan had bombed the US first, Pearl Harbor ring a bell?…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Truman was justified in his decision to use the two nuclear bombs on Japan. Truman had two choices when it came to ending the war in the Pacific, either invade the Japanese mainland or use nuclear weapons. The invasion of mainland Japan would have cost the U.S. many more casualties than there would be if the bombs were dropped. I believe that the U.S. was justified in dropping the atomic…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1945 to this day there is still a controversial discussion on whether it was justifiable or not to drop the atomic bomb. From saving american lives to annihilating japanese lives there is no justification to dropping the atomic bomb the way that the United States decided to follow. No matter how much the US would intimidate Russia, and how it was one of the only ways to have a completely unconditional surrender it, it wasn’t worth destroying all the lives of the villagers living in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The starting development for the atomic bomb occurred when Leo Szilard, a Hungarian physicist, moved to the United states to research nuclear chains and the possibility of creating a bomb with the chain reactions.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dropping the Atomic Bombs Although there had been years of planning the use of nuclear weapons in World War II, the final decision to drop the first atomic bomb was not made until the summer of 1945. This was after the Allies captured Okinawa, executed the firebomb campaign against Japan, and the Japanese ignoring the Potsdam Declaration. According to memorandum from General L.R. Groves to the Chief of Staff on August 6, 1945, “the gun type bomb was ready at Tinian on 31 July awaiting for first favorable weather.”…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the only times that atomic weapons have been used. To access whether the attacks were justified we need to consider at least two eyewitness accounts; which are available through the access to the media more precisely a particular issue of the New Yorker which had John Hersey’s “Hiroshima” taking up the entire magazine. The article only covers the bombing of Hiroshima, but since the bombing of Nagasaki was a plutonium bomb and more power we can assume that the aftermath of it was worse than the aftermath of Hiroshima. There were many victims of the unprecedented atomic attack by the United States against the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Yet, I only need to use two of the four victims in John Hersey’s article "Hiroshima.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Atomic Bombs Justified

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The United States were justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagisaki even though there were some negative effects. One reason for this is that the dropping of the bomb saved many American lives and also saved many Japanese lives. If the bombs were not dropped on Japan, there would have to be an attack on the Japanese mainland resulting in huge amounts of casualties on both sides. Taking Iwo Jima and Okinawa proved to be a very difficult task for the American soldiers, and they knew that taking the mainland of Japan would be a nightmare. President Truman also knew this and did not want more of his soldiers to be killed.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision to drop a nuclear bomb on a civilian population was controversial. Some argue the dropping of the bomb was a quick end to World War II while others argue that the detonation of a nuclear bomb on a civilian population was a hate crime motivated by a desire to demonstrate US military power and racism towards the Japanese. The US needed to show strength at a time of need and in the war quickly to prevent more American deaths. General Leslie Groves defends the dropping of the atomic bomb: “ We did not start the war, if they don’t like the way we ended it, Then they need to remember who started it” (qtd in Southard 109). After the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, killing thousands of Americans, the U.S decided to declare war with Japan.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima caused too many innocent deaths and too much suffering to be justified. The atomic bomb killed 90,000-146,000 people in the first few months after it was…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Bombs Justified

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When it comes to World War two, one controversial issue has always been the justification of the nuclear bomb dropping in the two Japanese cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. On the one hand, people with limited knowledge and a warped perspective on history argues that the two nuclear bombs dropped were not justified, and were quick and haste decisions in the White House. On the other hand, the logical and realistic audience contends that the bomb droppings were justified due to its effects in securing a fast and quick victory for World War Two. My own view on this issue is that dropping of the bombs on Japan was a necessary and wise action from Harry Truman since it was the only possible solution to end the war Although I agree to the opposing…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reasons the bomb should have been used on Japan are the likely cost of American lives as high as 100, 000 as many estimated, if fought on land, water and maybe a little less but still high on air and it’s a way as revenge for the surprise Japanese attack that killed 2,403 killed and 1,178 wounded of whom 68 killed and 35 wounded. The Battle of Okinawa proved evidence a very high casualties would result if Americans fought in the main islands of Japan, especially since Japan will keep fighting until they die. It would be a very quick way to end and win the war. The atomic bomb could be a message to the world why not to mess with us and kill or wound our people, “you mess with us, we come back even harder than ever imaginable”.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    August 6th and 9th 1945, the world was introduced to a new type of, ‘conventional weapon’. The atomic bomb. The dropping of these missiles on Japanese cities were not justified. It violated basic humanitarian treaties. Nuclear weapons have a capacity to unleash ‘hell on earth’.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan doesn 't seem to justify the ending of the war. The loss of civilian life and effect on citizens for decades after the bombing are one of main reasons why the united states should have altered their decision at the time. The United States claims to be a great super power and mitigator in times of distress however their decisions regarding the status of Japan prove…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified? This is a controversial topic that some would argue it was. However the bombing was not justified. The bomb used was the largest bomb ever used yet in history of welfare and was far more destructive than the bomb used on Pearl Harbor. The United States responded brutally, and unnecessarily.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As the second World War was drawing to a close in the Pacific theater, the United States ultimately decided to use its new weapon that they have been developing in the top-secret Manhattan Project, the atomic bomb, on Japan on August 6th, 1945. The United States, including Truman and top military officials such as Secretary of War Stimson, opted to use the weapon for a variety of reasons including drawing the war to a quick end. While the U.S. ultimately used nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, other options were available for the top government and military officials to consider. After seventy years of the U.S. using these nuclear weapons, much debate still exists on whether the use of the atomic bombs was the correct decision, especially…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays