Why Is The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb Justified

Improved Essays
From a 21st century perspective there is a lot to consider when discussing the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan. When choosing to bomb an entire nation to shambles to protect personal interests one has to look at all the accounts associated with it. While the united stated may try to rationalize the reasoning behind its actions, the bombing of Japan during World War II will never be justified. The moral obligations of the United States to the rest of the world are too high for the United States to use its powers for such evil. One of the proposed reasons for dropping the bomb was its effectiveness in ending the war. The other side uses this argument as their reasoning to justify dropping the bomb. While it may have seemed like a good enough option at the time, considering the ramifications now it simply was not worth it. The United States is such a great nation and for …show more content…
Looking at it from a 21st century perspective, when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor it was done so on a military base. Japan’s bombing is considered one of the casualties of war as countries during wartime attack each other’s military in order to weaken them. However, the American response was to attack Japan to devastation so that they wouldn 't be able to recover. At this point America had already bombed Japan many times before actually considering the atomic bomb. Using the atomic bomb was rash decision to end the war before thinking of all the casualties. The United States decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan doesn 't seem to justify the ending of the war. The loss of civilian life and effect on citizens for decades after the bombing are one of main reasons why the united states should have altered their decision at the time. The United States claims to be a great super power and mitigator in times of distress however their decisions regarding the status of Japan prove

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Document K Secretary of War Henry Stinson says clearly, “The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand Japanese… But this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative”. America had been bombing civilian and industrial cities for almost a year which alone caused many more deaths than the bombs. Also, the operation to invade the Japanese mainland would have ended in a bloodbath of millions of civilian deaths including those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Americans had already planned to bomb those industrial cities months before. It was fair for the Japanese to fear occupation but anyone could tell that the germans and the americans were some of the nicest…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I agree with what you are saying. The lives of the Japanese people could have been saved and taken into more consideration. Dropping of the Atomic bomb was preventable, but I think when considering that it was to show power I can see why they did it. That doesn't make it right by any means, we need to consider all sides of situation before taking…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United states should not have dropped the bomb because the use of the bomb was illegal, it was racially motivated, and inhumane. The U.S. should not have dropped the bomb because the bomb was illegal. “Any attack on legitimate military objectives must be carried out in such a way that civilians populations in the neighborhood are not bombed through negligence” (Doc E).…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dropping the bomb was the most logical decision because it caused the least amount of deaths by the end of the war, demonstrated through the United States scientific advancements and weapons, the least amount of casualties and property damage, and the social values of the Japanese society refusing surrender. The atomic bomb was not only important in ending the war, it was also an important advance in technology. The scientists who created the bomb were not positive of the fact that the bombs would work. The scientists valued the need to test the bomb if the bomb worked it would bring a stronger destructive power to the United States.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, all the background information, interviews, meeting notes will aid in my research to get a better understanding to why and how the decision was attained to drop the atomic bomb. However, it is equally important to understand the historical content, political, social and economic trends that follow after and important event, because it will help to understand how things changed and how they will influence our decisions in the future. For example, the Red Scare did have a major impact on the effects on the society and the U.S government, which raised concerns about the communists. Thus, it does raise questions for my research whether or not the true reason around dropping the bomb was to end the war with Japan or, to impress the Soviets that the United States was…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of the bomb was not illegal. The United States were not part of the League of Nations, meaning the laws did not apply. Additionally the law did not outlaw the use of nuclear…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, I investigated the sources that were against the use of the bomb before the bomb was dropped including the intentions behind the bomb, and concerns from the Interim Committee . Then I looked at the evidence against the bomb after the bomb was dropped, including Henry Stimson’s concerns, and the horrific loss of Japanese life due to the bomb. It is interesting to see the difference between the worries before the bomb and after the bomb. The first document I looked at was Dropping the Atomic Bomb was Neither Necessary Nor Justifiable by Gar Alperovitz. In his essay he argues one of the reasonings for the use of the bomb was to scare the Soviets and to prevent an invasion of the Red Army in Manchuria.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From a military standpoint it was not necessary as the Japanese were ready to collapse; it was only necessary in order to allow the US to get what they want. Document H speaks to this, dismissing the American claim that its use was necessary to end the war and thus causing the Document 's critique of the decision as making America "the arch-enemy of humanity" to be not far off the mark, as the evidence suggests that America cared not for Japan or its people but only for how to advance American interests. From a scientific standpoint, the power of the bomb was already known and needed not to be tested again, let alone on actual people. Finally, any positive diplomatic effects the bomb might have brought about were either nonexistent or overshadowed by the cost of the moral high-ground the US enjoyed before its use: tensions with the Soviets worsened, the Cold War became inevitable, and millions of people were affected. Thus the use of the atomic bomb was a diplomatic blunder to say the…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The bombing in Japan showcased the true power of the atomic bomb. In a sense, the world became more cautious in using atomic warfare due to the horrors of its effects. If the US did not use the atomic bombs, other nations would not have as much of a sense of its power. “Since it would certainly be used in the future time,” the bombs could have been used against the US (Source 5). Therefore, using the bombs on Japan may have prevented the US from being bomb with atomic warfare.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The strongest points as to why we should not have dropped the atomic bomb are mostly related to the bomb being dropped for unjust reasons or that it was essentially a geopolitical power play. But, these ideas also contain flaws that ultimately do not create a strong case for not dropping the bomb. The most commonly used reason, undoubtedly, is that even without the…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cost and harsh aftermath of bombs are the second reason why the bombs should not have been dropped. Even though the bombs were a great achievement for America, the result of the bombs was seen as a harsh punishment. A quote from the same article says, “but that experience, looking down and finding nothing left of Hiroshima. Hiroshima didn’t exist.” The result of the atomic killed on a massive scale destroyed the city along with its people.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays