Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Essay

Was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified? This is a controversial topic that some would argue it was. However the bombing was not justified. The bomb used was the largest bomb ever used yet in history of welfare and was far more destructive than the bomb used on Pearl Harbor. The United States responded brutally, and unnecessarily. Things could have been handled way differently. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unjustified because many innocent lives were lost, the U.S. could have handled the matter in a less brutal way, the U.S. was unaware the outcome of the atomic bomb.
The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unjustified because many innocent lives were lost. The bomb not only has destroyed the land permanently killing thousands of innocents and destroying their homes, but left radiation to kill thousands …show more content…
could have handled the matter in a less brutal way. The U.S. committed acts of murder more than the act of war. The bomb could have been as destructive as the bomb used on the attack of Pearl Harbor. The bombing may have been more justified if the bomb had been dropped in a less populated area, showing the japanese what america was capable of. Many different things could have been done to Japan that would have had a less negative long-term effects. Instead of the U.S. looking for a quick way to end thing, they could have planned the attack in a more rational way.
Finally, the bombing was unjustified because the U.S. was unaware the outcome of the atomic bomb. The atomic bomb had never been used before. The U.S. didn’t know the amount of destruction the bomb would bring. It’s understandable that revenge was wanted but to drop a bomb never before use that no one knew anything about in regards to the destruction, on innocent civilians is a ruthless, cold-blooded act. It was a gratuitous act to use a weapon so dangerous and so foreign, on a country that didn’t deserve