Why The Atomic Bomb Was Successful

Improved Essays
America is a very advanced country, but for 1945 the atomic bomb was considered a new, rare, and powerful weapon. They began to develop Little Boy before War World 2 began, but as ideas changed two models were made. The first one, made of uranium and dropped in Hiroshima, was called Little Boy. This was a sign to them that the war would be ending soon. In order to secure the end of the war they dropped another bomb made of plutonium in Nagasaki.This one was considered successful to Americans because 135,000 people died. According to the article titled “The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Both bombs were successful because 135,000 people died for Little Boy and 64,000 people died for Fat Man. Although, It was not America’s intention …show more content…
The opposing side may say there were other options that could have worked such as attacks in other large cities, naval blockade, or even aircraft carriers dropping individual bombs. These were less mature ideas and they could never be proven successful. It would have been a great risk to go with any other plans therefore, the atomic bomb was the most safe path for Americans. Other weapons may have gotten the job done, but would you run the risk? The longer the war was the more American lives were put at stake. The Japanese were given a fair warning before the bomb was dropped. In fact, the bomb was the result of the Japanese refusing surrender. The atomic bomb was expected by the Japanese, thus it was not America’s fault that they did not respond correctly. Americans told the Japanese that “[they] should take steps now to cease military resistance. Otherwise, [America] shall resolutely employ this bomb and all our other superior weapons to promptly and forcefully end the war” (“Leaflets dropped on cities in Japan warning civilians about the atomic bomb, dropped August 6, 1945”). The Japanese were given options to end the war with small consequences and save many of their civilians. They were stubborn and refused all of them so America can not be held responsible for their decision. If America did not give enough of a warning to them “The British, …show more content…
It may have unintentionally killed many civilians, but what if other immature ideas such as the aircraft bombings did not work? What if the war was prolonged for so long that many more Americans died? Although these are just 2 risks they were too big to have been taken. American’s needed to be protected and it was useless for them to die in a war that was practically already won by them. The atomic bomb did lead to death, but when there is a war death is what comes with it. Death can not be avoided and this was the quickest way. “The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand Japanese. No explanation can change that fact and I do not wish to gloss over it. But this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent choice. The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war. “ (Henry). Now, it is easy to look back and say there were other options, but at that time we were losing too many Americans and time in that war. It was the quickest and least risky way because it was definitely going to

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In World War II, America expanded military tactics and extremity of weapons that would change the world forever. As early as the beginning of the war, brilliant minds such as Albert Einstein advised President Truman on creating a nuclear bomb. (“Nuclear Bomb”) This bomb was meant to be the most powerful weapon ever used in military history. The Manhattan Project was the codename for America 's research in trying to create the world 's first atomic bomb.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Day America Detonated Cruel Bombs To most Americans Pearl Harbor was awful. 2,500 people dead, 1,000 more wounded, 18 American ships destroyed, and 300 airplanes destroyed. Pearl Harbor was awful, but Hiroshima and Nagasaki were worse. Soldiers killing soldiers is war, Soldiers killing innocent civilians is murder.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The primary bomb, dropped on the city of Hiroshima on August 6 1945, brought about a loss of life of around 135,000. The second, which hit Nagasaki on August 9, killed no less than 50,000 individuals. Many people died from the atomic bomb released by the United States of America. I feel as if the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan was justified.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dropping of the two atomic bombs has become a very controversial topic. People have many different views on what should have been done. One is that the United States should of only dropped one bomb on Japan or that they should never have dropped any bombs and gone a different route. When looking at the facts and what the United States would have planned to do if they did not drop the bomb, dropping the bomb was the best solution to beating Japan in the war. Research of atomic bombs started before World War 2 began.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Americans were not justified to drop the Atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Americans wanted the Japanese to stay in the war until they were finished with the Atomic bomb so they could test it on humans. The Americans could have ended the war three months before they finished making Little Boy and Fat Man to bomb the Japanese. (Mullins)…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are Atomic Bombs Necessary

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    People in the wake of the bombs were killed or severely injured both mentally and physically. Entire families and neighborhoods of Japanese civilians were whipped out by the atomic bombs. The bombs weren 't necessary, because it is never necessary to take the lives of innocent people. Anyone with a heart can see that it is inherently evil, soulless, and wrong to take the lives of so many women, children, elderly, and men. The few survivors faced radiation sickness, starvation, and crippling mutations.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It all started in 1938 when the first discovery of the atomic bomb was found known as fission. Top physicists from different countries were gathered to help make the deadliest weapon in the world. The government entrusted these physicists with the secret of constructing the atomic bomb so other countries like the Soviet Union and Germany would not figure out their detailed plan. Although they were given that oath to secrecy, inside the walls of Los Alamos the Laboratory used for the building of the bomb in New Mexico, physicists took detailed information to the direct source of the Soviet Union. Steve Sheinkin gives you an entirely new look at the dropping of the atomic bomb in the book “Bomb”.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Importance

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In president Truman’s perspective, the adamant refusal of the Japanese Emperor to surrender was a major rational for using the bomb to end the war and the ongoing deaths of millions of soldiers and civilians: “The target will be a purely military one and will issue a warning statement asking the Japs to surrender and save lives” (Truman 57). In this hope, President Truman was cynical about the reaction of the Emperor to accede this solution: “I’m sure they will not do that, but we will have given them the chance” (Truman 57). Politically, the American government was very concerned about the reluctance of the Japanese emperor to end the war, especially with the threat of the an atomic bomb being dropped on Japanese cities. In this context, Truman and military and scientific advisors were convinced that dropping the bomb would be a necessity given the adamant refusal to surrender by the Japanese government.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After several years of fighting , it was no surprise that each nation was feeling the toll of the conflict, which is why the U.S. wanted to put an end to it. As stated by Taketo Suzuki in ‘Why Was the A-Bomb Dropped on Hiroshima’ “One reason for the atomic bombings given by the United States was to hasten the end of the war.” When dealing with foreign conflict it’s safe to say that a government’s priority should be protecting the lives of their citizens. Continuing to send troops would have resulted in more casualties on the American side, which is why their choice to drop Hiroshima and Nagasaki is deemed admissible, given that the Japanese had already claimed thousands of American souls during WWII, and preventing any more was in the United States best interest. All of the bloodshed from the atomic missiles could have been avoided if Japan had agreed to the allies terms of surrender.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question I proposed is the following: “Was the United States dropping the Atomic Bomb justifiable? I decided to research and argue this topic because the Atomic Bomb being reasonable is very controversial. The argument can be argued either way and it is debatable for multiple reasons. Inclusive, many Americans and people around the world are in favor for not dropping the bomb. They claim it was the initiation of human destruction and against inhuman to kill that large amount of people.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Inhumane Bombing of Hiroshima Edward Bond once gravel stated, “We are still living in the aftershock of Hiroshima, people are still the scars of history.” World War II was an extremely gruesome period of time for both the United States and Japan. Many of the atrocities which took place are yet to be recognized as war crimes despite the clear evidence surrounding them. One of the most common crimes overlooked throughout the World War II era is the bombing or “incineration” of Hiroshima. Both Japanese and United States citizens believe if Japan continues to refuse to admit that they performed many wrong doings, the United States will also continue to deny it 's war crimes (U.S.).…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Almost 80,000 died instantly at Hiroshima while the rest died later of radiation poisoning and other aftermath. Although many people fail to mention that there were American civilians present in Hiroshima and Nagasaki when the bombs were dropped, nut this was “pushed under the carpet” to make the bombing look good. The united states missed a major opportunity to avoid the use of nuclear weapons in japan by not giving a public demonstration of the power of the U.S. new nuclear bomb. This may have been the solution to ending the war without bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although the United States believed bombing the cities would show more of a intimidation fact then a demonstration would.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As it is essential to recognize that not only was Japan ready to surrender and were given no choice to modify its unconditional surrender. But also destroyed two cities which were limited in military value and had civilians out number Japanese troops, but also were destroyed simply fro power in politics between the U.S and the Soviet Union. The facts from the presidents administrators, secretary of war and even Truman’s chief of staff all stood together and stated that it was unethical, barbaric and abhorrent. Many historians have fought continuously over which was decision was right or wrong to choose, but most evidence indicates that it was the wrong thing to do morally. Furthermore, the bomb was used for several wrong reasons such as causing fear to both Soviet and Japanese governments, in order to put an end to the war and be capable of unconditionally place restrictions at both governments basically holding both countries hostage until their demands were…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout life, we’ve become more and more invested in science, exploring the things we could do. Yes, we can do certain things, but should we? Sure, science has helped us throughout the ages, science has saved us, but it also destroyed us. There are some things we should not create, that we shouldn’t do. Oppenheimer and his co-workers crossed that line 70 years ago.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays