Why Is Hiroshima Bombing Justified

Improved Essays
Hiroshima Essay It has now been a little over seven decades since the catastrophic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unleashed and nuclear warfare was unveiled to the world. This attack took place toward the end of World War II, in which the United States dropped “Little Boy” and “Fat Man” on the Japanese, resulting in detrimental losses, and an inevitable surrender from Japan, but at what cost? The devastation that was caused not only affected Japan, but the entire world at the time. Countless lives were lost and a new type of warfare introduced. A frequent question asked is whether the course of action taken by the U.S. was justified or not. Many argue that these bombings were too severe and that America could have easily taken down …show more content…
After several years of fighting , it was no surprise that each nation was feeling the toll of the conflict, which is why the U.S. wanted to put an end to it. As stated by Taketo Suzuki in ‘Why Was the A-Bomb Dropped on Hiroshima’ “One reason for the atomic bombings given by the United States was to hasten the end of the war.” When dealing with foreign conflict it’s safe to say that a government’s priority should be protecting the lives of their citizens. Continuing to send troops would have resulted in more casualties on the American side, which is why their choice to drop Hiroshima and Nagasaki is deemed admissible, given that the Japanese had already claimed thousands of American souls during WWII, and preventing any more was in the United States best interest. All of the bloodshed from the atomic missiles could have been avoided if Japan had agreed to the allies terms of surrender. These circumstances were found in the Potsdam Declarations, which was announced on July 26, 11 days before Hiroshima was bombed. Plenty of time was given in order to make an appropriate judgment, and the choice was ultimately up to them. However, if Japan failed to succumb to these conditions, utter destruction was unavoidable. Unfortunately, the Japanese government chose to neglect the declarations. As reported by Taketo Suzuki in ‘Why Was the A-Bomb Dropped on Hiroshima’ “On July 28th, two days after the Potsdam Declaration, Prime Minister Kantaro-Suzuki made a statement at a press conference to the effect, “We will ignore (mokusatsu) the Potsdam Declaration.” A government that simply “ignores” something as crucial as a set of conditions that can benefit thousands of your own people by eliminating the possibility of any more deaths is deeply deranged. The prime

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Truman Hasty Decision Dbq

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From order of President Truman, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thus ending World War Two. President Truman’s hasty decision is not one to be honorable. This choice by the president was made with ignorance, lack of empathy, and lack of critical thinking. The bombing is unjustified due to Japan’s inevitable surrender, the amount of civilian casualties, and alternative opportunities to the bombing.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the aftermath of the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor the United States retaliated on August 6, 1945, at 8:15 a.m. the crew of the Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb over the city of Hiroshima. The bomb detonated 2,000 feet above the center of Hiroshima, destroying 60% of the city and killing an estimated 70,000 to 100,000 people immediately. Due to amount of civilian deaths this led to, we often ask ourselves if the bombings over these Japanese cities were necessary. To debate wether the bombing was necessary we should pay attention to Japans decision to continue to not surrender after the first bombing. If a country is that proud and resilient for them to still refuse to surrender after one nuclear bombing killing between 70,000 to 100,000…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Document K Secretary of War Henry Stinson says clearly, “The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand Japanese… But this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative”. America had been bombing civilian and industrial cities for almost a year which alone caused many more deaths than the bombs. Also, the operation to invade the Japanese mainland would have ended in a bloodbath of millions of civilian deaths including those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Americans had already planned to bomb those industrial cities months before. It was fair for the Japanese to fear occupation but anyone could tell that the germans and the americans were some of the nicest…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I agree with what you are saying. The lives of the Japanese people could have been saved and taken into more consideration. Dropping of the Atomic bomb was preventable, but I think when considering that it was to show power I can see why they did it. That doesn't make it right by any means, we need to consider all sides of situation before taking…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped bombs killing thousands of people on Japan, which effectively ended the Second World War. The bombings against Japan were necessary because they had warnings and a chance to surrender, things could have ended up worse, and most of all it protected the lives of the US. Japan didn’t have a direct warning that the US was going to bomb them, but there was a statement encouraging Japan to surrender while the bomb was still being talked about. Japan didn’t surrender. For months we dropped more than 63 million leaflets across Japan, warning them of bombings.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United State’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during World War ll is one of the most arguable controversies in American history due to the questionable reasoning behind its use, and the horrific effects it had on Japanese citizens. At the time of the bombing it was actually supported by a vast majority of the American public. During 1945, the decision to use the bomb was not only supported but encouraged. In August of 1945 opinion polls given to the American public showed 85% of Americans supported bombing Japan (Hadley, 21). On the contrary, historians such as Gar Alperovitz have argued Truman used the bomb merely to gain political status and power over the Soviets.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was an average, hot day in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. Home to the Japanese army’s Second General Headquarters, yet also home to 280,000 civilians, 43,000 military personnel, and 20,000 Korean forced laborers (Gray, Paul, and Kunii). Everything had been running accordingly, adults going to their jobs, school children assisting in the cleaning of the streets, until they saw a foreign object, hurling at them at a fast speed. It exploded before anyone had the chance to choke out the work ‘bomb’, leaving the menace behind the death trap, President Truman,a villain to Japan. The Japanese had attacked multiple places before the bombing occurred, including cities such as Shanghai, Manchuria, and most famously, Pearl Harbor.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Teetering to Surrender: A Critical Analysis of “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration” Individuals see “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration,” by Sadao Asada, as tedious and boring. Including names of different articles and historians can seem useless and insignificant, however I challenge you to see the strengths within this piece. Asada’s academic article puts entertainment and emotional appeal aside to discuss a different side of the Hiroshima bombing then previously emphasized, due to new information. As a result, Asada’s factual article presents a convincing case: the atomic bombs and Russian pressure were both necessary for Japan to finally surrender,…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First off, if you know nothing about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, then I will give you the history of how it all started, and then maybe you can have an easier time to decide if the US was justified. From the start of the first war in 1939 American scientist, and many of them were refugees from Europe, became highly concerned with nuclear weapons research by the Nazis. In 1940 the U.S. government made the decision to fund its own atomic weapon development program. This program also became the joint responsibility of the Office of Scientific Research and…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion, United States were right on dropping the bombs. Although hundreds of innocent Japanese lives were lost, millions of American and Japanese lives could have been killed. An article on www.militarythistorynow.com before the decision to drop the bombs, there was Operation Downfall. Operation Downfall was the mission where US soldier would storm onto Japanese homeland but never happened. The article states, “Had the invasion not been preempted by the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, almost all agree that the campaign would have stood as the bloodiest chapter of the Second World War, adding as much as an additional 10 million dead”.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, world war two was not a disagreement to cause destruction towards the countries. The U.S was justified in dropping atomic bombs as it was an alternative to end the war at an instance and to also prevent the death rate of civilians. This was also necessary as it was America’s desire to shorten the war if the Japanese surrendered. In addition, the USA were acting against the Japanese in…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this argument, though a popular one among critics of the bombings, is fictitious. According to Thomas Flagel, author of The History Buff’s Guide to World War II, “the cabinet of Prime Minister Suzuki Kantaro agreed to a cease-fire but not capitulation” (284). In other words, Japan would peacefully demilitarize, but would do so on its own terms. The Japanese generals and politicians who refused unconditional surrender would only settle for “‘honorable’” terms, like withholding parts of the Japanese empire that the Allies wanted (Hastings, Inferno 627). Furthermore, on July 26, 1945, several days before the bombing of Hiroshima, the western Allies forewarned the Japanese that, if they refused surrender, their country would be met with “‘prompt and utter destruction;’” however, the Japanese practically disregarded this declaration, thinking that the Allies were threatening more of the usual “firebombing and eventual invasion” (Hastings, Inferno 626-627).…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Issues In Ww2

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The saying “all is fair in love and war” comes to play in this instance. Our military had a problem to fix in order to do their duty by protecting American soil and they managed to fix it the best way they knew how, given certain conditions and complications. Unfortunately the Hiroshima explosion wiped out about 90 percent of the city, killing 80,000 people instantly and tens of thousands later died of radiation exposure, but it could have been a lot worse for both sides. There was a time for them to surrender without any consequences when the U.S. proposed the Potsdam Declaration, which threatened the Japanese with “prompt and utter destruction” if they refused and of course Japan denied. In return, we blew their world up.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays