Why Is Hiroshima Bombing Justified

Improved Essays
Hiroshima Essay It has now been a little over seven decades since the catastrophic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unleashed and nuclear warfare was unveiled to the world. This attack took place toward the end of World War II, in which the United States dropped “Little Boy” and “Fat Man” on the Japanese, resulting in detrimental losses, and an inevitable surrender from Japan, but at what cost? The devastation that was caused not only affected Japan, but the entire world at the time. Countless lives were lost and a new type of warfare introduced. A frequent question asked is whether the course of action taken by the U.S. was justified or not. Many argue that these bombings were too severe and that America could have easily taken down …show more content…
After several years of fighting , it was no surprise that each nation was feeling the toll of the conflict, which is why the U.S. wanted to put an end to it. As stated by Taketo Suzuki in ‘Why Was the A-Bomb Dropped on Hiroshima’ “One reason for the atomic bombings given by the United States was to hasten the end of the war.” When dealing with foreign conflict it’s safe to say that a government’s priority should be protecting the lives of their citizens. Continuing to send troops would have resulted in more casualties on the American side, which is why their choice to drop Hiroshima and Nagasaki is deemed admissible, given that the Japanese had already claimed thousands of American souls during WWII, and preventing any more was in the United States best interest. All of the bloodshed from the atomic missiles could have been avoided if Japan had agreed to the allies terms of surrender. These circumstances were found in the Potsdam Declarations, which was announced on July 26, 11 days before Hiroshima was bombed. Plenty of time was given in order to make an appropriate judgment, and the choice was ultimately up to them. However, if Japan failed to succumb to these conditions, utter destruction was unavoidable. Unfortunately, the Japanese government chose to neglect the declarations. As reported by Taketo Suzuki in ‘Why Was the A-Bomb Dropped on Hiroshima’ “On July 28th, two days after the Potsdam Declaration, Prime Minister Kantaro-Suzuki made a statement at a press conference to the effect, “We will ignore (mokusatsu) the Potsdam Declaration.” A government that simply “ignores” something as crucial as a set of conditions that can benefit thousands of your own people by eliminating the possibility of any more deaths is deeply deranged. The prime

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The United State’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during World War ll is one of the most arguable controversies in American history due to the questionable reasoning behind its use, and the horrific effects it had on Japanese citizens. At the time of the bombing it was actually supported by a vast majority of the American public. During 1945, the decision to use the bomb was not only supported but encouraged. In August of 1945 opinion polls given to the American public showed 85% of Americans supported bombing Japan (Hadley, 21). On the contrary, historians such as Gar Alperovitz have argued Truman used the bomb merely to gain political status and power over the Soviets.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Abhorrent but Necessary On August 6, 1945, the city of Hiroshima, Japan went up in smoke when “Little Boy,” an atomic bomb developed in the secretive Manhattan Project, was dropped. Three days later, the atomic bomb dubbed “Fat Man” obliterated another Japanese city, Nagasaki. The bombing itself and its effect on survivors’ health was devastating, and President Truman’s decision to drop the bombs remains highly controversial 71 years later. In fact, Naji Dahi, Ph.D., insists that the bombings were unnecessary, unjustified, and ineffective.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As it is essential to recognize that not only was Japan ready to surrender and were given no choice to modify its unconditional surrender. But also destroyed two cities which were limited in military value and had civilians out number Japanese troops, but also were destroyed simply fro power in politics between the U.S and the Soviet Union. The facts from the presidents administrators, secretary of war and even Truman’s chief of staff all stood together and stated that it was unethical, barbaric and abhorrent. Many historians have fought continuously over which was decision was right or wrong to choose, but most evidence indicates that it was the wrong thing to do morally. Furthermore, the bomb was used for several wrong reasons such as causing fear to both Soviet and Japanese governments, in order to put an end to the war and be capable of unconditionally place restrictions at both governments basically holding both countries hostage until their demands were…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "How will the world use its nuclear capability?" (“The Decision to Drop the Bomb”) is a conflicting question that the world does not know the exact answer to. The American people never imagined the strength and lasting effects of the nuclear bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Most American citizens believe that bombing Japan was the only option at the time. While arguments against and for the bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki are substantial and noteworthy, the appalling effects were ethically unjust to the civilians and suggest that American leaders were selfish and racist.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Usage of the Atomic Bomb The atomic bomb was used mainly for the purposes of war and freedom over the Axis Powers, Germany, Italy, and Japan. The United States had to use them to keep the American people out of fear and to not have anyone else on their side have any more casualties. It has changed the United States’ history forever because it was used in WW II, dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and helped the United States end and win the war.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With over 200,000 casualties due to his mindset, he failed to account for the other opportunities he had to guarantee America’s success in the war. Other alternatives that could have been substituted for the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki include receiving assistance from the Soviet Union, intensifying existing war strategies and compromising on Japan’s capitulation. With all these in mind, President Truman had no right to put atomic bombs to use on the Japanese population. It is a shame that Harry Truman missed all these opportunities to end World War Two earlier than it did just because he saw it more fit to drop atomic bombs on a civilian population. This does not justify his actions though as mankind can never unseal the great magnitude of nuclear…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, world war two was not a disagreement to cause destruction towards the countries. The U.S was justified in dropping atomic bombs as it was an alternative to end the war at an instance and to also prevent the death rate of civilians. This was also necessary as it was America’s desire to shorten the war if the Japanese surrendered. In addition, the USA were acting against the Japanese in…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Truman Hasty Decision Dbq

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From order of President Truman, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thus ending World War Two. President Truman’s hasty decision is not one to be honorable. This choice by the president was made with ignorance, lack of empathy, and lack of critical thinking. The bombing is unjustified due to Japan’s inevitable surrender, the amount of civilian casualties, and alternative opportunities to the bombing.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    You have heard two reasons why dropping the atomic bombs in Japan was not justified and unnecessary. But perhaps the most compelling reasons why dropping the bomb was not justified is that the United States was weeks or months away from Japan surrendering and the war ending before dropping the bombs and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people. As you will hear from General Mitsuru Ushijima, Japan was already losing the war. The country was surrounded by US troops, Americans controlled Japanese airspace and waterways, and US casualties in military battles were low compared to Japanese. The US commanders knew that Japan was close to surrendering as Germany had already surrendered, and Russia, another powerful military force, was…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    This text examines the necessity of dropping the bombs on Japan and how it affected…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bomb that they dropped wasn’t needed to defeat Japan. The thousands of lives that were lost, even before the war ended, was just one reason why the United States wasn’t justified to drop a bomb. According to USHistory,org, the bomb that was dropped by the U.S. in Hiroshima instantly vaporized 70,000 Japanese citizens.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Time and time again the United States of America has proven itself to be a lethal force in war, this is both the nation’s greatest wartime strength and its weakness. When the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing thousands of Japanese and instituting the conclusion of conflict in the Pacific Theatre of WWII, it was proven to the world how ruthlessly violent the nation truly is. The United States’ use of the atomic bomb was not necessary primarily as it caused massive civilian causalities. Additionally, the decision to drop the bombs was not properly justified, as Japan at the time was already very crippled and the Axis powers were on the brink of losing the war. Unequivocally, the dropping…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon (the atomic bomb) and not used it and let a million more people die.” stated Colonel Tibbets, the pilot of the Enola Gay. (Document L) The Enola Gay was the plane that dropped the first atomic weapon on Hiroshima. The Colonel was saying that if they had not dropped that bomb, it would have killed more of their men (the Americans), which would have been morally wrong because you are supposed to do what’s best for your team or army. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were definitely a Military Necessity because as stated earlier, a minimum of a million more people would have died if they did not follow through with the bombing. They needed to protect their own soldiers first.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays