• Home Page
  • The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

Decent Essays
Show More
Though the atomic bombing brought the war to end sooner than it would have been, it is a hasty and wrong decision to take.
Truman took office as a president but, unfortunately, he had no knowledge concerning foreign policy and international affairs. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have led to world war end but because of the civilian casualties involved, it’s not right.
The decision to use the atomic bomb was partially a show-off of American strength over its enemies. The impact of the bombing on human beings and the environment is quite enormous and it is felt for many generations after the war.
Those in favor of the bomb argued that dropping the bomb is better than invading Japan because it will save lives. This I do not agree with,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    How Did Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb Dbq
    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb Dbq

    With over 200,000 casualties due to his mindset, he failed to account for the other opportunities he had to guarantee America’s success in the war. Other alternatives that could have been substituted for the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki include receiving assistance from the Soviet Union, intensifying existing war strategies and compromising on Japan’s capitulation. With all these in mind, President Truman had no right to put atomic bombs to use on the Japanese population. It is a shame that Harry Truman missed all these opportunities to end World War Two earlier than it did just because he saw it more fit to drop atomic bombs on a civilian population. This does not justify his actions though as mankind can never unseal the great magnitude of nuclear…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Truman Hasty Decision Dbq
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Truman Hasty Decision Dbq

    From order of President Truman, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thus ending World War Two. President Truman’s hasty decision is not one to be honorable. This choice by the president was made with ignorance, lack of empathy, and lack of critical thinking. The bombing is unjustified due to Japan’s inevitable surrender, the amount of civilian casualties, and alternative opportunities to the bombing.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Dropping The Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dropping The Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    In Document K Secretary of War Henry Stinson says clearly, “The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand Japanese… But this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative”. America had been bombing civilian and industrial cities for almost a year which alone caused many more deaths than the bombs. Also, the operation to invade the Japanese mainland would have ended in a bloodbath of millions of civilian deaths including those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Americans had already planned to bomb those industrial cities months before. It was fair for the Japanese to fear occupation but anyone could tell that the germans and the americans were some of the nicest…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Bombing
    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Bombing

    The Feelings of Indifference Towards Jews To this day, there is much discussion on whether or not we should have bombed the Auschwitz Concentration camp. It was a controversial topic during the war and is still controversial and debated on. The Allies should have bombed Auschwitz; they had all the needed technology and skill needed in order to carry out the operation, and in the long run, more Jews would have been saved in the process than the ones that had been killed during the bombing. Requirements Needed The Allies were more than capable of bombing Auschwitz they knew all the conditions that needed to be met, the time of day, and all the resources that were needed to pull it off successfully.…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Comparing The Atomic Bombs And President Truman's Decision
    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparing The Atomic Bombs And President Truman's Decision

    The Atomic bombs and President Truman’s decision to use them will always be up for debate. From the political standpoint it was the right thing to do for the survival of America’s troops and America. Hindsight is 20/20 and looking back on what has happened in the past and deciding whether it was right or wrong is impossible. President Truman was faced with a tough decision, end the war quickly with less loss of American life or face an invasion of Japan that could have killed a million US troops.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Bombing Japan
    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Bombing Japan

    In 1945, Japan was attacked with an Atomic Bomb. President Truman advised the bombs to be in place when bombing Japan. I believe that Truman should have done things differently before the bombing, but I also believe that he should have bombed Japan, but, I’m in a strong belief that they shouldn’t have bombed Japan. The reasons I believe that they shouldn’t be, they could have worked out a better form of issues to resolve, bombed it differently without the use of Atomic bombs, and lastly, let the Japanese people live in America. Japan and the United States should have resolved issues so they wouldn’t need to go to war.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Making An Atomic Bomb
    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Making An Atomic Bomb

    It is said the idea that America should make an atomic bomb come from a letter sent to the president Franklin D. Roosevelt from Albert Einstein. In the letter, Einstein warned the president of German efforts to build a nuclear weapon. Einstein urged the President to monitor the nuclear developments in the letter. We didn’t exactly monitor it, but instead we made our own… :/ When Einstein asked to be monitoring the efforts of making an atomic bomb by Germany, President Roosevelt didn’t take any action until two years later.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq
    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    Dropping the bomb was the most logical decision because it caused the least amount of deaths by the end of the war, demonstrated through the United States scientific advancements and weapons, the least amount of casualties and property damage, and the social values of the Japanese society refusing surrender. The atomic bomb was not only important in ending the war, it was also an important advance in technology. The scientists who created the bomb were not positive of the fact that the bombs would work. The scientists valued the need to test the bomb if the bomb worked it would bring a stronger destructive power to the United States.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    World War II: America's First Atomic Bomb
    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    World War II: America's First Atomic Bomb

    In World War II, America expanded military tactics and extremity of weapons that would change the world forever. As early as the beginning of the war, brilliant minds such as Albert Einstein advised President Truman on creating a nuclear bomb. (“Nuclear Bomb”) This bomb was meant to be the most powerful weapon ever used in military history. The Manhattan Project was the codename for America 's research in trying to create the world 's first atomic bomb.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing
    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

    Parcc Practice 2 Ever since the very beginning of time humans can find both sides for an argument for about every subject. The atomic bomb is no exception. The atomic bomb would cause mass destruction but would lead to a quickened end to the war. The decision to drop the bomb was contemplated by many officials and was influenced by many more people who wrote to them. This paper will discuss the effectiveness of multiple writers and their common strategies such as considering the lives of the Japanese, the affect the bombing would have on the US, and the ending of the war.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay
    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq
    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Even today, many debate whether or not the US should have dropped the atomic bombs. Not only have the bombs killed many Japanese, the bombs also caused radiation sickness. However, these bombs were effective in that they ended one of the most costly wars the world has seen. Although the results of the atomic bombs were devastating to Japan, the US was justified in dropping the bombs because it swiftly ended the war, which effectively saved more lives than it costed.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Was The Atomic Bomb Justified
    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Was The Atomic Bomb Justified

    The question I proposed is the following: “Was the United States dropping the Atomic Bomb justifiable? I decided to research and argue this topic because the Atomic Bomb being reasonable is very controversial. The argument can be argued either way and it is debatable for multiple reasons. Inclusive, many Americans and people around the world are in favor for not dropping the bomb. They claim it was the initiation of human destruction and against inhuman to kill that large amount of people.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Was Hiroshima Bombing Nagasaki Justified
    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Was Hiroshima Bombing Nagasaki Justified

    1945 was the end of the biggest war in US history, and there is one major event that is one of the most argued topics about history to date. America was the first country ever to use the atomic bomb in warfare and it was very catastrophic, but the age-old question is still debated today: was it necessary to use the atomic bomb in warfare at all, let alone twice? The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was very destructive to the people and the land, killing over 100,000 people on impact and later tens of thousands more from: sickness, disease, radiation, etc. and destroying the majority of the land creating a fallout. This controversy is very important to society because people argue that if the bombs were not dropped thousands of innocent lives…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima

    Many people argue whether the US’s decision to drop the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima was a justified action or not. In my opinion, the bomb was justifiable in its actions since it accomplished a goal that could not have been done without it. The dropping of the Atomic Bomb shortened the war and with it saved many lives on both the Allied side and the Japanese side, it also justified the expense it cost to make the bomb and prior to the bombing, the Japanese were given numerous chances to accept unconditional surrender. In short it is a justifiable act since it brought benefits with it’s actions that could not have been achieved through conventional terms. The Manhattan Project was the codename for the US led effort to develop and successfully use an Atomic Bomb.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings