Hiroshima And Nagasaki Persuasive Essay

Improved Essays
For years there have been debates about whether the Unites States should have dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Dropping the bombs did allow for a swift end to the war, but thousands of people, citizens and soldiers alike, were still murdered, and both Japanese cities were decimated. People are still suffering from the leftover radiation today. The United States should not have dropped the atomic bomb. With knowledge of this new power the world would have something new and very dangerous to fight over. After effects of the bombs were not known at the time, and radiation was not fully understood, which should’ve been taken into consideration when deciding to use the weapon. Dropping the bomb could have also been avoided for …show more content…
Thousands of people, civilians and soldiers alike, were murdered. Both cities were decimated, and Japan’s economy was suffering greatly. However, the whole situation could have been avoided. Japan was already on the brink of surrendering when the U.S. dropped the bomb. If the attack would’ve consisted of regular bombs, the actions of the Japanese would have been similar, but there would have been fewer casualties and a lower chance of future world destruction. With the knowledge of nuclear fission and the power that comes with it, countries are constantly threatening each other with nuclear war. If a future nuclear war were to take place, there would be hardly anything left growing or living. Humanity wouldn’t necessarily be wiped out, but the world would not be a pleasant place to live any longer. Also, scientists working on the bomb were not fully aware of what they were dealing with. Nobody completely understood the consequences; the unknown after effects were terrible, ranging from blood injuries to cancer. Dropping the bomb was inhumane and brutal. So many innocent lives were lost and many lives were later affected. The dropping of the bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima were crimes against humanity and an unnecessary show of force and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Ww2 Dbq

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They took many innocent lives that day and that is the reason we entered the war. Those are the reasons why it was a good idea to nuke Hiroshima. After the attack on Hiroshima the USA dropped letters to tell the people if they don’t surrender the city of nagasaki would be bombed. The Japaneses did not listen and did not surrender.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I agree with what you are saying. The lives of the Japanese people could have been saved and taken into more consideration. Dropping of the Atomic bomb was preventable, but I think when considering that it was to show power I can see why they did it. That doesn't make it right by any means, we need to consider all sides of situation before taking…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was enough reason for the USSR not to demand joint occupation of Japan. In the other hand, used the bomb convinced the world of its horror, it has prevented its use in the future. Last, after this incident, it creates peace for the world. Even Japan have the ambitions, they did not have enough resource that can use for the other war.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From a military standpoint it was not necessary as the Japanese were ready to collapse; it was only necessary in order to allow the US to get what they want. Document H speaks to this, dismissing the American claim that its use was necessary to end the war and thus causing the Document 's critique of the decision as making America "the arch-enemy of humanity" to be not far off the mark, as the evidence suggests that America cared not for Japan or its people but only for how to advance American interests. From a scientific standpoint, the power of the bomb was already known and needed not to be tested again, let alone on actual people. Finally, any positive diplomatic effects the bomb might have brought about were either nonexistent or overshadowed by the cost of the moral high-ground the US enjoyed before its use: tensions with the Soviets worsened, the Cold War became inevitable, and millions of people were affected. Thus the use of the atomic bomb was a diplomatic blunder to say the…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Even today, many debate whether or not the US should have dropped the atomic bombs. Not only have the bombs killed many Japanese, the bombs also caused radiation sickness. However, these bombs were effective in that they ended one of the most costly wars the world has seen. Although the results of the atomic bombs were devastating to Japan, the US was justified in dropping the bombs because it swiftly ended the war, which effectively saved more lives than it costed.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The strongest points as to why we should not have dropped the atomic bomb are mostly related to the bomb being dropped for unjust reasons or that it was essentially a geopolitical power play. But, these ideas also contain flaws that ultimately do not create a strong case for not dropping the bomb. The most commonly used reason, undoubtedly, is that even without the…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As if the first bomb was not bad enough, another bomb was dropped on another Japanese city. The development of the atomic bombs cost America billions of dollars. Many thought there were could have been different ways to get back at Japan other than spending…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As it is essential to recognize that not only was Japan ready to surrender and were given no choice to modify its unconditional surrender. But also destroyed two cities which were limited in military value and had civilians out number Japanese troops, but also were destroyed simply fro power in politics between the U.S and the Soviet Union. The facts from the presidents administrators, secretary of war and even Truman’s chief of staff all stood together and stated that it was unethical, barbaric and abhorrent. Many historians have fought continuously over which was decision was right or wrong to choose, but most evidence indicates that it was the wrong thing to do morally. Furthermore, the bomb was used for several wrong reasons such as causing fear to both Soviet and Japanese governments, in order to put an end to the war and be capable of unconditionally place restrictions at both governments basically holding both countries hostage until their demands were…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bombs that were dropped on these cities have led to Japan’s surrender but the impact left behind is not yet forgiven. The dropping of the bombs did much more than ending the war in the Pacific. Many building were crushed and the cities became a dumpster area where many dead bodies laid. However, the dropping of the atomic bomb help stopped Japan’s involvement with World War Two. If the American’s didn’t do this, they would’ve been in a much worse situation and would raise up to surrender.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Abhorrent but Necessary On August 6, 1945, the city of Hiroshima, Japan went up in smoke when “Little Boy,” an atomic bomb developed in the secretive Manhattan Project, was dropped. Three days later, the atomic bomb dubbed “Fat Man” obliterated another Japanese city, Nagasaki. The bombing itself and its effect on survivors’ health was devastating, and President Truman’s decision to drop the bombs remains highly controversial 71 years later. In fact, Naji Dahi, Ph.D., insists that the bombings were unnecessary, unjustified, and ineffective.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roughly seventy years ago marked the explosion of the nuclear bombs dropped over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The merciless bombs were dropped on August 6, 1945, by an American officer in the U.S Air Force by the name of Charles W. Sweeney, on a Booing B-29 Superfortress bomber plane during the final stages of World War II (1939-1945). The mid nineteen forty 's was without a doubt a staggering time for the Japanese nation; this was a period loaded with resentment and anger as they glimpsed a massive nuclear bomb headed straight to them as a B-29 bomber fled the scene after destroying almost their entire city. According to an online historical article provided by the history channel titled “Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki”, the impact wiped out nearly 90 percent of the city and killed over 80,000 people instantly before the bomb had even hit the ground; a few thousand later then died because of the immense amount of radiation after affect the bomb…

    • 1322 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays