A. The Primary objectives of the PPMAP are to ensure compliance with applicable procurement policy and processes; determines the effectiveness of existing procurement processes; develop ways to improve effectiveness and responsiveness; identify any potential statutory or regulatory issues posed by current procurement practices; and identify innovative procurement procedures and strategies. (D.1.22, pg.3, para 4., green-highlight)
B. The Procurement Performance Management Assessment Program (PPMAP) is a three-pronged approach consisting of: (1) Continuous Self-Monitoring, (Annual Self-Assessments, and (3) Rotating Field Activity Reviews. Each AIR-2.0 department shall continuously self-monitor, perform annual self-assessments and …show more content…
In accordance with CCI 5211.4G, Requirements for Officials Contract Files, a contract file checklist shall be maintained for all procurement actions. Upon completion of each action, the PCO (or contract specialist, if delegated) shall review the contract file to ensure inclusion of required documentation and sign and date the checklist. (D.1.22, pg. 4, para (1), yellow highlight)
(2) Annual Self-Assessments. Each AIR-2.0 headquarters department and field site shall conduct and document a PPMAP review of its procurement activities every fiscal year. In accordance with PPMAP Procedure Guide and PPMAP Assessment Checklist, the review team shall document any unacceptable findings, deficiencies, or material weaknesses found in file examinations on the PPMAP Assessment Checklist and in a written report submitted to AIR-2.1 within 2 weeks of the conclusion of the annual self-assessment. (D.1.22, pg. 4, para (2), green highlight)
(3) Rotating Field Activity Reviews. Each year, AIR-2.0 shall conduct a rotating field activity review. These rotating field activity reviews shall assess the field activity’s overall procurement function through the examination of a randomly selected sample of contracting files. In accordance with the PPMAP Procedures Guide and PPMAP Assessment Checklist, the review team shall document any unacceptable findings, deficiencies, or material weaknesses found in file. (D.1.22, pg. 4, para (3), yellow