Interdependence Theory

Great Essays
The international arena is full of rapid change, challenges, and uncertainty. Scholar use theoretical tools to further understand global politics. The most prominent theory driven tools used today are Realism and Liberalism. These two theories vary in definition and people ascribe to them as ways of viewing the world, predicting the future of events and furthering their understanding of state behavior. Two great books that exemplify such theories are “The Tragedy of Great Powers” by John J. Mearsheimer and “Power and Interdependence” by Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye Jr. These books explain theoretical tools by showcasing how such tools explain state behavior. As the world continues to evolve scholars and theorist attempt to change and …show more content…
It was written, to guide readers through learning theoretical tools that will guide individuals to understand the world more accurately. The theoretical tool they used to base their argument was the Liberalist theory, however, the focused one of the theories major points, which is interdependence. Even though, the authors tried to explain interdependence as a theory on its own, one cannot deny this theory has deep seeded origins from the Liberalist theory. They clearly state that neither the traditionalist vision nor the modernist vision is nowadays adequate to interpret our world, due to the fact that there is an “ever- growing and multidimensional interdependence”. Another interesting feature of this book is that the authors compare two ideal types: realism and one that they constructed, complex interdependence. None of these ideal types reflects reality exactly, but they help to understand what happens, because most situations fall between these two extremes. In contrast to that, the ideal type of complex interdependence has rather different assumptions. To begin with, the state is not the only important unit, and there are many channels that connect societies (not only interstate channels, but also trans governmental and transnational ones). Also, there isn 't a hierarchy among issues, and it is more difficult to distinguish between …show more content…
The authors try to explain how our world is changing and highlight many times throughout the pages of this book that they believe that different frameworks are needed for different situations, and that old contributions are as worthy as new ones (Keohane & Nye, 1977). It is essential, however, to know when to use each one, and when we must combine them, in order to grasp the various situations. The book "Power and Interdependence" tried and succeeds in attacking the conventional wisdom in the game that if realism were the leading theory international cooperation would not be institutionalized (Keohane & Nye, 1977).

A major challenge between both schools of thought is to assume rationality. Given the current election in the United States it is difficult to address realism and liberalism as rationality. The president-elect Donald Trump is not expected to be a rational actor in the international arena.
He claimed to dismantle NATO, improve relations with Russia and dismantle a lot of the international treaties in place. This will be immense difference from past United States actions. This new occurrence will likely change many state relations and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Psycholinguists have debated the topic of language’s origin and meaning for centuries. These theories are valuable tools to expanding our minds, but can also easily morph our learning process and worldview on the importance of language. This work briefly explains the basis of Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, along with Chomsky’s theory of Universal Grammar, and the criticisms of both. Cognitive awareness and strict adhesion to one perspective of language origin has the ability to actively shape language development itself. Sapir-Whorf and Universalism were both grounded in an attempt to explain language, but were studied in fairly biased experiments.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cohen 's book, International Political Economy: An Intellectual History, he references George Santayana 's infamous quote, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This can be seen as a truism in the study of GPE. The historical perspective provides the realm in which scholars can study and debate the history of the international political economy to be able to provide insight in what the current and future actions should be. The variety of models and theories that contradict one another in this perspective are necessary to provide numerous accounts of the history, like Cox argued history and theory are open-ended. New perspectives and analysis produce new concepts for policy in the global field. This can be seen in a great deal of academic research in GPE, including a comparative study done of British and American Hegemony by David…

    • 1072 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It means that understanding of anarchic system would be in all beginnings to deal with global issues. She has also borrowed some ideas from notable scholars in this field to stress the gravity of anarchy for explaining the world politics. In her writing, prominent theorists, such as Kenneth Waltz and Robert Keohane who suggested each different approach to see international relations, have pointed out that the essence of anarchic system could be explicated by game theories, for example, the Stag game and the Prison’s Dilemma. The more important thing here is that their analyses of anarchy’s characteristic are in line with enduring pursuit of either national or common…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    George Orwell once wrote “Who controls the past, controls the future. Who controls the present, controls the past" (Zinn 89). The notable quote holds a lot of wisdom, and a message of exercising caution when it comes to history. Dominant ideologies and views of history have had calamitous consequences when gone unchallenged by society. Marchak discusses who creates and controls the dominant ideology in contemporary society, as they are the ones ‘who control the present’.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He writes with the intention of raising awareness for the problem he sees, and to warn the reader that to strip meaning from language is to play a very dangerous game. Into the Electronic Millennium is a great exposition of what Birkerts thinks to be the major problems with electronic communications. He builds a strong argument that the switch from print to electronic media not only radically changes the contexts that lay behind reading, but also the way that societal functions like language and language work.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The setting of both Never Let Me Go and The Matrix reflects the extremes of possible negative connotations which current technological trends could impose on society, and it is this relation to the modern world which makes Dystopian texts so engaging. Political exploitation of the individual is an issue whcih needs to be considered, and the texts explore various aspects of the idea. The means for such a system, socially conditioning a group of people into either ignorance or willing passivity, is presented to the reader in a manner which brings it into a present context. Due to the parallels between many of the typical Dystopian elements and the moder world, Dysopian texts are especially suited for conveying political ideas to a contemporary…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    15, 1999). This view highlights one of the overarching issues with this theory. For realists, rationality is used as a means to act on self interest. Furthermore, these principles rooted in self interest will end up causing difficulties partnering with other states. This proves why Morgenthau’s realist theories on six principles should be just used as a historical…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    “The Promising Generation” Generational Theory is a highly debated topic and can produce very radical stances. Don Tapscott’s gives his own insight on the topic and raises an essential question in Grown Up Digital. This question is, do Millennials, or as he calls them the Net Generation, have more potential than they are given credit for? It is first mentioned in the introduction section and expanded upon throughout the book. This question defines Tapscott’s book with all the information presented leading back to it.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Berelson et. al. introduces the idea that we struggle to live up to an ideal political society. He states that we are influenced by the behavior put forth from the government. His main claim is that there is a main impact of realistic research in contemporary politics which need further requirements to have traditional normative arguments.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Distinction between power and politics It might be relatively straightforward to give a definition of power and politics but it is more difficult to distinguish between them (Drory and Romm, 1988). Drory and Romm (1988) argue that these two are often used interchangeably and that the difference between the two has never been fully established. There are numerous academic definitions of power and politics. Politics can be defined as the science catering on guiding and influencing policies and the conduct of work. Politics can be a leading impetus to change management.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays