Realism And The End Of The Cold War Wohlforth Analysis

Improved Essays
Realism and the End of the Cold War by William C. Wohlforth argues that Modern realism began in a reaction to the breakdown in the post-World War One international order. Wohlforth’s main ideology is realism and states how the rise and fall of realism has taken place, but stresses that international world events cannot weaken or destroy the realist ideology. The collapse of the great power cooperation helped emerge realism to be a dominant position in international relations. The central question presented in this article looks to seek to ask, did the rapid decline and peaceful collapse of the Soviet State, along with the postwar international order, discredit the realist approach? However, Wohlforth believes that. Realist theories were not …show more content…
He discusses the intellectual challenges by the post 1989 changes in world politics, What we should expect these series of changes to tell us about international relations theories? How much do these theories tell us about these events? Second he outlines the realist explanation of recent changes in world politics. Third he examines the critiques of the realism theory based on the Cold War and Soviet collapse. Last, Wohlforth brings up some important lessons brought up from these post 1989 …show more content…
The Soviet Union failed to challenge American hegemony. Wohlforth says that structural or neorealism was so popular to the Soviet Union because it seemed to explain the state of affairs. The end of the Cold War international system was caused by the collapse of the Soviet Union. Regardless of the cause, the global transformation of the collapse of the Cold War was realized when a great power abandoned territory, which this . This statement greatly represents realism. The explanation of the fall of the Soviet Union would be to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Gorbachev and other central decisions that were made in the state such as the strengths and weaknesses of socialism, and national sentiments of the Soviet Union, but to understand the events in world politics we must understand the theories as weak as they may be. It gives us implications to help us understand the wide variations of interactions that occur among states, and how fast nations and how much other nations are able to undergo change from past earlier eras. Wohlforth says that a casual analysis is important to realism in order to save it. Critics of realism understand the weaknesses of realism,

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Ronald Reagan Ideology

    • 3937 Words
    • 16 Pages

    “We Win, They Lose”: How Reagan’s Foreign Policy Brought Down the Soviet Union The 1980s was a pivotal era in world history. After decades of America’s failed containment policies which strengthened and helped spread Communism across the globe, a change in direction was desperately needed. Ronald Reagan fundamentally shifted American foreign policy as president, which in turn, greatly influenced the collapse of the “evil empire” by the early nineties. Although the Reagan Administration did not live to see the collapse of Soviet Communism, Ronald Reagan’s foreign policy contributed to the fall of the Soviet Union.…

    • 3937 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Berlin Wall Dbq

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    No one expected the collapse of the Soviet Union since as a superpower, it held a powerful position. A decline in power was expected, but not the fall of the empire as Gorbachev’s methods were taking too long to make any type of difference. Many people still rejected the Communist party and refused to embrace their ideas and way of thinking. Gorbachev struggled with the communist party imperial elites and the military. These struggles led to failures which added to the fall of the Soviet Union and Gorbachev practically finished himself.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He develops his arguments by relating to thinking about how people think and idea-based explanations of why things work or happen the way they do and the opinions of different history experts. However, he seems to have be bias by presenting the United States as the innocent party while the Soviet Union is the Evil Empire. Despite these faults, the argument is forceful well researched and supported by excellent governmental information that was received storehouses of old…

    • 1061 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The downfall with the Post-Revisionist Perspective is that it assumes the Cold War was unavoidable, however, when one takes into account the power vacuum that was created in Europe after the war and the dedicated, some might say fanatical, ideologies of both the United States and the Soviet Union that is a convincing argument. The divergent perspectives on the emergence of U.S.-Soviet tensions influences the understanding of the Cold War by allowing different ideas to be further explored, in particular when examining what was a clear battle over the balance of power in a newly bipolar world. In conclusion, the viewpoint a person most agrees with is not so much important as is being able to examine the individual situations during this fascinating time in history and to take away the fact that despite all deterrence the United States and the Soviet Union never stopped communicating which is something that is of mass import in regards to foreign relations even…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lost but not loser: The assessment of the claim that the Soviet Union lost the Cold War Introduction With the disintegration of Soviet Union, the Cold War era, which lasted as long as 40 years, had come to an end. The last Soviet Premier Gorbachev, ironically, been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize after his failed reformation and governance in Soviet Union, which, to put it the other way round, could been seen as affirmation for his struggle to pave the way for nuclear agreement and open the seriously bureaucratic Soviet Union to the world. It could be easy to conclude from the phenomenon that Soviet Union lost the Cold War, as Brzezinski alleged in 1990, “the end of the Cold War would make two winners: the United States and Germany, and two…

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In George Kennan’s Thesis “The Sources of Soviet Conduct”, Kennan addresses four key points explaining the motives and forces behind the behavior of the Soviet Union around 1947 and the impacts of this on the Soviet and the reactions of the US. Kennan identifies that the political nature of the Soviet Union is a product of Marxist/ communist ideology. A view that revolution, lead by the working class would overthrow the economically weak and exploitive, capitalist system and replace it with an equal, classless society. Kennan points in the overthrow of the Tsarist government and resulting social and economic strife faced after the Bolshevik Revolution as the foundations of the faulted ‘communist system’. Marxism focus on the overthrow…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cold War by John Lewis Gaddis John Gaddis puts a very interesting thesis into play on the cold war perspective. Gaddis’s thesis has the equity needed to truly understand the cold war. His thesis fearlessly states that the Soviets and the Americans are both the cause of the Cold War. The Soviets and Americans both wanted a way of life they thought was better and their was a geopolitical struggle between the two countries.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A note of caution to those that associate realism and the rational actor model. Some may make the mistake of dismissing the realism of Thucydides because of the weaknesses of the rational actor model laid bare by contemporary academics such as Jervis and Kahneman. This is unfortunate because many lessons Thucydides and the larger school of realism teaches will continue to illuminate international relations now and in the future due to their basis in nature of human behavior. In 1888, the venerable Otto von Bismarck predicted that “some damned foolish thing in the Balkans would ignite the next great war.”…

    • 2228 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I choose to explain the reason in which such event occurs according to the theory of constructivism and liberalism. The event in which this paper examines imposes a wider question, why do countries collapse, what affects them. The succumbing and death of great nations and empires always captured the attention of researchers and readers. Therefore, the whole subject of the survival and decay of the Soviet Union provoked the choice for this paper.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This article shows the least biased and gave credit to both Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan for the end of the Cold War. Basically, this brings together both of the previous articles to form a nonbias essay. The author says if there was to be a name to who won the Cold War it would be Reagan. However, he states “both views have their merits; neither position by itself gets at the truth”. This statement proved how the author believed both sides had major contributions in ending the Cold War.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Neoconservative Approach

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Cautious Approach to U.S. Grand Strategies in Foreign Policy While there is a general consensus that in the post-Cold War era, the United States emerged as the world’s unipolar superpower, the role of superpower continues to be widely debated. Political realists err on the cautious side and see other state actors as possible threats not only to the balance of power, but also to the U.S. itself. Realist policy prepares for the worst. Neoconservatives believe that the U.S.’s democratic idea and values must be shared with those who don’t have them, and the only fit actor to do so is the United States. I must urge the application of realist theory to influence grand strategy of U.S. Foreign Policy.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Book Review Author: Robert J. McMahon Title: The Cold War: A Very Short Introduction Publisher: Oxford University Press Place and Date of Publication: New York, 2003 Topic and Scope: In The Cold War: A Very Short Introduction, Robert J. McMahon discusses a general account of the Cold War, spanning the period from 1945 to the finale of the Soviet-American confrontation in 1990. McMahon discusses key events, trends, and themes that that highlighted key players, such as Stalin, de Gaulle, and Reagan. He also devotes much attention to the Cold War 's domestic as well as international effects.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The rising state will seek to alter the international system in ways that favor its interests. Other states must anticipate that, as a potential adversary 's power rises, so will its appetites. In other words, the other state must confront the possibility of direct challenges to their own core interests. The great strategic dilemma in this situation is to determine exactly how to respond to this ongoing power shift, so the states could ensure their survival. In fact, realist theory may provide the basis for a range of policy options; offensive realism and defensive realism are amongst them.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reform of “perestroika” (restructuring) could not significantly improve the standard of living in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. This discontent with the current system, in combination with “glasnost” (open discussion and democratization), contributed to the end of the Soviet Union. Glasnost…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Prominent in realist theory is the concept of anarchy. Anarchy in international politics is defined by Mearsheimer as a system of ‘independent political units (states) that have no central authority above them’ (Mearsheimer 1994). Such a system promotes the concepts of self-help, statism and survival which suggest that war is the result of independent states fighting for power and national interest in order to survive. Given that the world has only been at peace for 8% of all of recorded history (Hedges 2003), these concepts are of great significance to realist in order to dissect war and understand why it is so prominent in international politics. Therefore, the bases of this essay will be formed using the aforementioned concepts to outline…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays