Physician Assisted Suicide Case Analysis

Firstly, If terminally ill cases do not want to live, they should not be allowed to take the valuable beds. Those beds deserve for patients who want to get better. The patients who chose to dead, which means the rights to die. Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, 1997 says you should be respected for human dignity and individual liberty, because they were suffered with pain of the hopeless patient, it couldn’t be treated better. There are many cases of mercy killing, for instance; CNN, 2005 found that Terri Schiavo is a case of euthanasia, because she suffered a heart attack with the it total necrosis of cerebral neurons, and a persistent vegetative state, so her husband allowed her to die, her alive with no chance in get better. Secondly, The resources that are spent on terminally cases can help future patients in the same symptoms who can be cured. …show more content…
Debatewise, 2003 comments that some terminal illness patients were conclusively wasteful on medical resources for long term in palliative care of them. Moreover, Why defective these invaluable resources on someone who was passing a require to die, if they could be better the life of someone, and nobody wants to live