Persuasive Essay On The Fourth Amendment

Improved Essays
The San Bernardino shooting was a tragic event. A cell phone recovered after the shooting has been collected as evidence. Law enforcement believes that unlocking the phone which is an iPhone would help them learn more about the attack and plans. They also believe that this would allow them to intercept future attacks and protect innocent people. Guessing the code incorrectly ten times is believed to erase the data on the phone (Lichtblau). The government has reached out to Apple INC. asking for their help. The government needs apple to create a back door into the iPhone so that they can take down the security wall and access the information on the phone safely.
Apple has been reluctant to assist in this task stating that creating the software
…show more content…
In my opinion gaining access to the San Bernardino gunman’s phone is in no way a violation of the fourth amendment. Having done research on the fourth amendment I know that to search someone or something you have to have probable cause or a search warrant. In a case like this a search warrant was not necessarily needed, but because the phone was property of someone else one was issued. The gunman killed innocent people and could possibly pose a threat to others in the future. I think that Apple needs to think about the bigger picture here. If you are dead you can’t use a phone. Apple keeps saying that creating a back door will put everyone at risk and how the software doesn’t exist that no one has access to that. I look at it this way, there are people who made the security wall for the iPhone. If they know to construct it they know exactly how to deconstruct it. The software in fact does exist just not in a physical sense. It exists in the minds of those who are responsible for the iPhone software. Which means at any given point in time one of these people could gain access to iPhone how they please. So this excuse that Apple has made up is not solid and they should try again so they can look even more stupid. The fact is that iPhone security is already at risk, people are just too lazy to take the time to break down the security wall because it would take too long and they

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hacking

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    And my evidence is that only about 51% say that is should be unlocked and about 39% people say that they should not unlocked the phone. But the Apple company is like they should not give the software to the FBI but if they lose the case they will have to unlock the phone. But then the Apple company is have trouble with the FBI but the Apple company has some rules so that they will not unlock the phone. I wonder if the Apple company will still make a updated phone so that the FBI will not get in people phone any more. But I hope the FBI will leave the Apple compon alone and just find some hacker to open it.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Subsequently, Apple creating a backdoor system will create a domino effect that will negatively affect not only IPhone owners, but all smartphone owners. Furthermore, according to source H “If Apple obeys the FBI’s order, it would set a dangerous precedent for the future, both brief claims…”, meaning that once Apple creates a backdoor system, the government now has proof that an alternative way to access the system is possible. Consequently, the next time an incident occurs like this but instead with a Samsung Galaxy, the precedent will mandate Samsung to also create a similar backdoor system. More importantly, according to source H, thirty two social media companies are siding with Apple on this controversy. Mindful of the possible precedent, a majority of these companies probably do not agree with the FBI because they could possibly ask these companies for the same information.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Terrorism has been a threat to mankind, since many years. So, unlocking Farooq’s iPhone might definitely help the FBI team, to solve the Farooq’s case to some extent, in finding the true culprits responsible for the slaughter, at San Bernandino. 2. Unlocking an iPhone, which no one ever thought could be unlocked, could be considered another advancement in science. 3.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Apple should unlock the iPhone no matter their reasoning not to. Families of the people who were killed need answers, as well as the rest of the world. If this is the way to get them then shouldn’t they be doing everything in their power to get the answers? Stephan Larson, a lawyer representing some of the victims, said that his clients had an interest in the contents of the terrorist phone. They were targeted by terrorist Larson said and they need to know how and why this had happen.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On February 16 Apple released a letter to all Apple customers explaining why they will not help the FBI create a back door to all iPhones. This poses a question to all smartphone users, whether privacy is more important than security. Apple stated that they will help the FBI try to find the passcode however, someone reset the phone which makes it harder. Privacy is crucial to America and the government should not get involved with citizen’s privacy because it violates our individual rights. On December 2014 Syed Farook and his wife Tashfeen open fired at a Work Christmas party in San Bernardino, California as a part of a terrorist attack killing fourteen and wounding twenty-two ( Willens, 8).…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    14 citizens were killed due to the shooting, yet Apple wouldn’t decide to help the FBI. Apple is looked at as a bully, and denying the request from the FBI has started a small war about human rights. People only fear that creating a method to obtain data would fall into the wrong hands, however, with highly specialized encryption every phone user could become a potential threat. We pledge allegiance to our country for security, and honor a code to help the government protect the people. With the FBI being professional, Apple could develop a technique that could be shared to enhance personal security while balancing private security.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Apple was enhancing their security to meet the growing demands of their users and to protect their information. It is similar to tactics and approaches used by law enforcement, which have changed over time, to effectively deescalate threats such as bombs or a suspect with a gun. They both progressed for the safety of their patrons. Bill Gates said, in support of the FBI, “[this] is a specific case where the FBI is asking for access to information.” Granted, this was an exceptional case of large-scale domestic terrorism but all the facts weren’t on the table. For example, not disclosed to the public were the 12 other iPhones that the Department of Justice wanted access to from Apple in pending criminal cases by court order.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine living in a world where the government had complete control and access to your personal secrets. This world might soon come upon us if we don’t take a stand against the F.B.I. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is convinced that they have the right to forcefully intrude on an individual daily life when they choose. In March of 2016 went against the F.B.I beliefs by sticking to its ideals and protecting individuals rights. Apple did this by refusing to help the F.B.I unlock an iPhone belonging to Syed Farook.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Iphone Ethical Dilemma

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The FBI think that the new IOS software can help agents unlock the phone and access the information on it as a one-off case. However, the CEO Cook of Apple refused to acquiesce to the government’s demand, citing…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the government be allowed to force a company to unlock its secrets? Apple should not have to give the FBI access to their secrets because it opens a backdoor for hackers. These Apple vs the FBI cases are subjective realities because what we believe in alters our perception of the nature of things. The FBI says that they are fighting for safety and that if we want them to protect us we have to give up some of our rights to privacy. They want to decide how much we give and to whom we are giving it to.…

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays