The 4th amendment is being violated in this scenario; for the 4th amendment states that; “U.S. citizens are protected from unreasonable searches of a person’s property.” Mrs. Jones was only being a good neighbor and friendly. But the police lied to her that way they could gain access to her house. Then they proceed to look around then arrest her when they find a bomb. Yes, arresting her would protect everyone else, but you have to have a warrant before you can even arrest anyone. They still needed to get a warrant, or her permission, to even take the bomb from out of her house.
The 1st amendment is being violated in this scenario; for the 1st amendment states that; “U.S. citizens have freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.” …show more content…
citizens are protected from cruel and unusual punishment.” Stephanie Manus deserves to be put in prison for kidnapping but the idea of even making her shave her head and stand on the freeway is too much. The judge shouldn’t have suggested this because prison would be enough, if the judge does decide to make her do that, he wouldn’t be able to do that. Since that would be cruel and unusual punishment, thus violating the 8th amendment.
The 7th amendment is being violated in this scenario; for the 7th amendment states that; “U.S. citizens have the right to a trial by jury.” Mr. Wiegold shouldn’t have taken the computer but he should have also been given a trial. The correct way of doing this would be to at least have a small trial to let him prove that he isn’t guilty or let him explain himself. The police aren’t higher than the law nor is the boss.
The 2nd amendment is being violated in this scenario; for the 2nd amendment states that; “U.S. citizens have the right to keep and bear arms, or own guns.” George could’ve bought all the guns at the show and would’ve been fine with it. The correct way of doing this would be for the security guard to not only lie about what the Constitution says, but to stop him from doing what he wants. It is allowed for any U.S. citizen to have as many guns as you want. The security guard should have said nothing and let the transaction
The 1st amendment is being violated in this scenario; for the 1st amendment states that; “U.S. citizens have freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.” …show more content…
citizens are protected from cruel and unusual punishment.” Stephanie Manus deserves to be put in prison for kidnapping but the idea of even making her shave her head and stand on the freeway is too much. The judge shouldn’t have suggested this because prison would be enough, if the judge does decide to make her do that, he wouldn’t be able to do that. Since that would be cruel and unusual punishment, thus violating the 8th amendment.
The 7th amendment is being violated in this scenario; for the 7th amendment states that; “U.S. citizens have the right to a trial by jury.” Mr. Wiegold shouldn’t have taken the computer but he should have also been given a trial. The correct way of doing this would be to at least have a small trial to let him prove that he isn’t guilty or let him explain himself. The police aren’t higher than the law nor is the boss.
The 2nd amendment is being violated in this scenario; for the 2nd amendment states that; “U.S. citizens have the right to keep and bear arms, or own guns.” George could’ve bought all the guns at the show and would’ve been fine with it. The correct way of doing this would be for the security guard to not only lie about what the Constitution says, but to stop him from doing what he wants. It is allowed for any U.S. citizen to have as many guns as you want. The security guard should have said nothing and let the transaction