Obama Transformational Leadership Analysis

1041 Words 5 Pages
While in office, Obama proved to be realistic and moderate. Obama made some initial attempts to distinguish himself as a reconstructive president. One example would be his executive order banning torture on his first day in office. Obama tried to continue his reconstructive tendencies like his signature achievement, the health-care reform bill. Yet not enough because the bill was largely conservative and when Obama abandoned climate-change legislation. But consistently Obama has continued the policies of the George W. Bush. He commenced a short war against Libya without authorization of Congress. Lastly, he utilizes the right to use unmanned drones to target and assassinate suspected terrorists across the globe. Transformational leadership …show more content…
Skowronek categorizes the presidents into four types: politics of reconstruction, politics of articulation, politics of disjunction, and politics of preemption.
A president can be categorized as a president of politics of reconstruction, if they had enormous freedom to establish a new order, make new commitments, and exercise the enormous power of the presidency. For example, President Reagan was able to reject the values and programs of the New Deal coalition and establish a new order.
Presidents of the politics of articulation could be described as follow-on presidents who are in charge of continuing the vision of the predecessor. There are two groups under this category: presidents who follow the coalition founder to the letter and the other group are presidents who attempt to renew a founder’s vision.
The presidents who are caught between the crossfire of supporters and opposers on long standing political orders are presidents of disjunction. Jimmy Carter was the last example of this type of president. Skowronek argues that these types of presidents are just unlucky and receive impossible governing
…show more content…
He identifies this development as a “recurrent sequence of change” and he reports that the main political coalitions are committed to a continuous endeavor for domination while all of them actively back a “particular approach to public policy questions” (Skowronek, 2008). While a dominant political coalition benefits in maintaining a dominant spot, it usually develops a governing reign which at first maintains an immensity of resilience and creates a large impact on political fads and institutional exercises on the federal floor. As certain adjustments spark up in the political sphere, the reign is no longer adept to match the “manifest governing demands of the day” and it progressively gets weak (Skowronek, 2008). Basically, the decomposition of the governing reign is likely to happen when the dominant political coalition is exacerbated by in-house discord and no longer supports the notions of its sponsors. As Skowronek dictates, the development of “erosion in majority-party support” it cannot be divided from continuous defeats of the president. To achieve the “difficult task of keeping faith with a ruling coalition in changing times” (Skowronek, 2008). When the authority of the Executive is questioned by his failures to execute primary political objectives and the consensus among the representatives of the

Related Documents