Is The Canadian Prime Minister Too Powerful?

Decent Essays
In many countries such as Canada and the United States, the hegemony has been divided between the executive branch, the judiciary courts and the legislative branch. “Generally, the amount of power for each member of these institutions is to be uniformly divided; conversely, the fairly recent transformation has increasingly concentrated the majority of power towards the hearts of the government” ("Is the Canadian Prime Minister too Powerful?,"2010). In recent years, many political scientist have argued that the demographic changes in political systems have led the executive branches in western governments to have extensive amounts of power. In this essay, I will argue that the executive branches of western governments; particularly that of Canada’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville are both giants in American political theory and both have deliberated extensively on the tyranny of the majority in democratic societies. Since both are from different eras, the way each of them talk about the problem is framed in different terms and different contexts. Madison offers a solution to a perceived problem, and Tocqueville observes and critiques the solution. In the many Federalist Papers Madison published on the issue, there is one solution that is most conductive to reducing the powers of the tyranny of the majority, and this is solution is the checks and balances between the separate branches of government and between the federal and state governments. Tocqueville’s assessment of this attempted restraint is poor, he sees the government as becoming increasingly centralized in power and state and local governments losing their prestige and influence.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prime Minister of Canada is a great gig. If you’re going to be the leader of a country, it doesn’t get much better than Canada. We have so much going for us. One of our greatest assets actually has nothing to do with us at all but rather the stellar quality of our neighbours. And every Prime Minister since Mackenzie King could count on that.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Per Hudson, the solution to this problem is to have a political alternative. The parliamentary system is a combination of the executive and legislative branches with the prime minister as the leader of the majority party. With this option, Hudson lists a few items he considers to be relevant to a parliamentary system, such as a greater accountability of the candidates and the officials by their respective political parties, as compared to American politicians. An example Hudson cites occurred in 1990 when the Conservative Party asked Margaret Thatcher to resign because they feared her leadership would result in defeat for the party. While this, indeed, is a change usually not seen in America, some of the parliamentary system features will not fit our country.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australia’s parliamentary system is categorised as a fusion as opposed to a separation of powers as the executive branch is answerable and part of the legislative branch. Each branch of government should work within their areas of responsibility so they act like checks and balances on each other with 100 years of stable government testifying to its effectiveness. A fourth way which holds the governmental branches accountable is the citizens of the country, they form a check and balance system. Citizens are able to judge a government come election time but Parliament holds governments responsible for their actions in-between elections (Fenna, 2014). Australia uses a liberal system of government which implies that there is a need to have limits of the power of governments as indicated by (Fenna, 2014).…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first chapter of William E. Hudson’s book American Democracy in Peril, Hudson discusses the reasoning and application of the separation of powers stemmed from the Constitution, and the impact it has had as well as the failures that came as a consequence of it. Due to the changing meaning of the Jeffersonian model, one of the failures Hudson argues is that the separation of powers in a partisan, party-based system falls apart once both parties are to blame. It is also argued that the same system creates a political minority “biased against change” to protect against the supposed tyranny of the majority. Hudson ends by making a case in favor of a change in government towards the form of a parliament for the sake of accountability and protection…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Role of Prime Minster of Canada and the President of the United States Many people think that President of the United States has more power than Prime Minster of Canada. However, when we look at the constitution of both countries, we can see that Prime Minister of Canada has more power in his or her country than President of United States does. When we want to compare and differentiate the power of both Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States, we need to look at their system of Government, roles of both Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States on legislative power, party discipline, appointive power, influence, and military power, and ability to implement their agenda. If we want to know more about the powers and role of Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States, we have to first look at their system of Government.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federal Versus State Many different aspects of governments go through power struggles, but sometimes it is which government itself is more powerful. The struggle between Federal Government and the state has existed since colonization. Both often feel that one should have more power than the other, but also are unsure which one does in fact have more power.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President of the United States(POTUS) - Chief of State, Chief Executive, Chief Diplomat, Commander-In-Chief, Chief Legislator, Chief of Party, Chief Guardian of the Economy. It seems the person who holds this position is the most powerful person in the world. But, as the pioneers of modern democracy, has the United States’ stripped the position of it’s power in it’s attempt to realize a perfect system of checks and balances? Or has the spike in executive duties given the President far too broad a purview? In a constantly evolving society, the role of the government and of the President are constantly changing causing sharp conflict between those who believe the President holds too little or too much power.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Through elections and the democratic process, citizens get the chance to grant authority to individuals to represent them and their interests because of this, elections and the electoral process are the cornerstones of democracy. Fair and representative elections encourage the exchange of ideas and opinions and are crucial in establishing a relationship between the government and the citizens they represent. Since elections have and will continue to be the most vital aspect of democracy, the procedural steps of elections and the formula for electing representatives will also be important. Around the world, there are different types of electoral systems. Along with these systems come debate about if these electoral systems lead to governments that truly represent the values of the population.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    POLS 301_3/31/17_Penelope Kahn pg1 Foreign Policymaking The creation and implementation of the separations of power, which supports a system of branches of government that incorporate checks and balances are important elements, to which the United States Constitution is founded and are what makes the United State’s structure of governing unique to all other nations. By dividing the government into three branches of government encourages checks and balances to be employed as internal controls that place limitations of power within the US government, therefore preventing a single system of government or political party from wielding too much power. The development…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    If the executive decides to emit power on the legislatures grounds or the legislature bypasses the main influences of judiciary the doctrine of separation of powers is breached, all must be evenly balanced (Kirby 2006). Sovereignty of parliament and independence of the court are the two conventions that a paramount for governmental symbiosis, parliamentary sovereignty is democratic in nature, ‘the populous decides on’ (Wells 2006). The impression of a fair trial comes from the independence of the courts. Although interference is frowned upon from legislature to judiciary, the convention of parliaments sovereignty means that a judges decision can, essentially be reversed or altered as an act of…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that the power of the government should be derived from the consent of the people as the government’s soul purpose is to represent the beliefs of the citizens they stand for. The people of the Great American Empire will directly elect the legislative body that represents them by voting on candidates for the House of Commons. They will serve for six year terms and are responsible for introducing bills as well as voting on them in order to turn them into law. Twice per term they will also elect fifteen individuals to compose the Senate who will be responsible for the second vote on bills to send them to the Executive Branch for final review, choosing the Prime Minister who will act as the head of the Legislative Branch, and advising him or her directly on legislative matters. The second division of the government is Executive Branch in which the President of the American Empire will lead and hold the Executive power.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Australia is said to be a democracy and seen as being about the people, and fair for all. Thus, separation of powers was formed to make sure that this is the case. Separation of powers puts the institutions of government into three different branches. These branches are: The legislature which make the laws; the executive government put laws into action; and the third brach,the judiciary interprets the laws. Separation of Powers is said to be the cornerstone of fair government.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America is a country where powers are separated in order to prevent an all powerful branch of government. The three main branches of government are the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branch. These branched serve the purpose of checking and balancing each other. The Executive branch has the power to implement laws. These laws are brought on by the Legislative branch.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is a summation of the fact that there is very broad overlap between the legislative and the executive in the UK constitution, as the two powers are closely entwined, often exercised by the same bodies. For instance, Government ministers are members of the executive who exercise a legislative function in Parliament and also when they make delegated legislation. The Prime Minister is a Member of Parliament and occupies a seat in the House of Commons, with a majority of his peers, thus the executive has a powerful influence in the legislative branch. From this, it is evident that a pure separation of powers is not an explicit feature of the UK constitution, and Walter Bagehot’s claim that there is a “nearly complete fusion, of the executive and legislative powers” holds true. However this should not mean that the UK constitution is inadequate and allows for tyrannical rule.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays