Ndeumeni Case Summary

Improved Essays
Ndeumeni finally contends that the circuit court erred in denying his claim for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. In his counter-claim, Ndeumeni sought $28,680 in damages resulting from damages incurred when Kemogne ceased contributing to the mortgage on the property and yet continued to live on the property. In the final judgment, the trial judge found that Ndeumeni suffered damages in the amount of $25,000 for the time in which Kemogne occupied the property as a wrongful detainer, as well as another $8,400 in unpaid rent from tenants other than Kemogne. In total Ndeumeni was credited $33,400 ($4,720 more than he sought in his complaint) for the time Kemogne occupied the property without making payments. In light of the fact

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The court decided that Vuylsteke took reasonable steps to mitigate her damages and awarded her the annual salary of $72,000 and $2,012 for relocation costs to move to London. Therefore, a total of $74,012, which is consequential damages. C. EXPLANATION: Do you agree with the court?…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Amanda Butler Stambovsky v. Ackley (Case Brief 1) Facts Ackley sold a house “possessed by poltergeists” to Stambovsky, without informing him that it was possessed. Stambovsky was not a local and did not know anything about the house’s reputation. Procedural History Stambovsky sued to have the purchasing of the house and contract reversed.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Background The case started back on May 20, 2005, in which a man by the name of Jerry Jackson had called the police after discovering what looked like a mannequin floating in the Grand Marais Canal in Jennings, Louisiana. Reporter Ethan Brown from Matter interviews Jackson and found out that the reason he called the police was because the mannequin was attracting flies, which it normally does not do. After the police were contacted, they arrived at the scene and found out the body belonged to Loretta Chaisson, 28, who was last seen three days prior. There was a high level of alcohol and drugs in her body, but no official cause of death. On June 18th, 2005, the body of Ernestine Patterson, 29, is found six miles from Chaisson’s body, with a…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plaintiff at trial was Cellco Partnership, now Appellant. Defendant at trial, Shelby County, now Appellee. Facts: Cellco Partnership, Appellant, originally entered a lease agreement in 1995 with Cellco Partnership (Verizon) allowing an easement to Stonebridge Water Tower. In 2000, Highway 64 learned that Verizon had installed cellular equipment on Stonebridge Water Tower and accused them of trespassing and threatened to file a suit against them. In 2001, Verizon (Cellco Partnership) filed a complaint against Shelby County and Highway 64 seeking a declaratory judgement stating the Verizon has the right to use the gravel access road or a declaratory judgement stating that Shelby County must provide Verizon with access to Stonebridge Water Tower, security from Shelby County to cover liability Verizon incurred from third parties as a result of a breach of the Verizon Lease, and an injunction…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ndeumeni further avers that the trial court erred in denying his motion to exclude the testimony of Kemogne’s witnesses where Kemogne failed to adequately disclose the witnesses and the contents of their testimony in discovery. Maryland Rule 2-433(a) bestows upon the trial court broad discretion in remedying discovery violations. Md. Rule 2-433(a). Critically, Rule 2-433(a) employs a permissive, but not mandatory, “may” where the rule provides that “the court . .…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Teri Case Summary

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Russell, 353 Mass. 366, 231 N.E.2d 563 (1967), the homeowners made a verbal contract to sell their home, one of which was a police officer. It was determined that the home that they had anticipated on purchasing was outside of the geographical limits that a police officer was required to live. The court held that the purchasers were entitled to some relief; including, “in lieu of the relief granted by the final decree to specific performance upon payment of the purchase price less the amounts already paid as a deposit, as well as interest thereon.” The court determined that the defendants had not shown enough evidence that they couldn’t get other living arrangements in the city that the police officer works.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Case Study 1: Lizardo versus Denny Inc. NDI Officers that were hired as security for Denny’s Restaurant escorted a complaining Asian American out of the restaurant and threatened to arrest him for disorderly conduct all because of a delay in seating (Curtis & McBride, 2011). A fight erupted outside and a group of African Americans that were waiting to be seated went outside to see what was going on (Curtis & McBride, 2011). One of them reentered the restaurant and was describing the commotion happening outside.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defendant EA has refused to pay the amount due and owing under the Lease. EA made an appearance in the action to petition for an extension of time to file an answer. EA’s counsel later withdraws their appearance and EA never filed an answer in the underlying action. On May 31, 2013, We moved for an order of default judgment in the underlying action. On October 15, 2013, following an ex-parte hearing on proof of damages, this Court awarded judgment in Plaintiff’s favor in the amount of one hundred sixty-six thousand seven hundred twenty-seven dollars and twenty-five cents…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Abramski v the United States is a case that questioned the legality of a lawful gun-purchaser buying a gun for another lawful gun-owner who resides in a different state and inaccurately listing that they are the actual buyer. Due to the Supremacy clause (86), it was up to the Supreme Court to make the final decision by looking further into the Gun Control Act of 1968, which was established to try and stop felons from obtaining a gun, and determining exactly what it prohibits. In 2009, Bruce Abramski bought a gun for his uncle, Angel Alvarez, because after his years of service as a police officer, he was eligible for a discount at a local Virginia gun store. Before he purchased the weapon, three federally-licensed gun dealers told Abramski to…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Collateral Estoppel Case

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rule 14-207(b), that GSMC and Ocwen lack standing to pursue foreclosure, and that the denial of her motions constitute a denial of procedural due process. These arguments rest on the premise that neither GSMC nor Ocwen has an enforceable interest in Sucklal’s note. It has been conclusively determined, however, that GSMC and Ocwen do have enforceable interests in the note. The judgment rendered in Sucklal’s declaratory judgment action satisfies the elements so as to invoke collateral estoppel with respect to the issue of Sucklal’s liability to GSMC and Ocwen on the instrument. Accordingly, Sucklal is estopped from arguing that GSMC and Ocwen have no interest in her note.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Neser Case Summary

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Neser first contends that the Board erred in looking beyond the text of the HCGPP to glean the intent of the provision involving call-in pay. Neser argues that the text is unambiguous, and as such the Board was unjustified in looking to extrinsic sources to discern the HCGPP’s meaning. We disagree. “‘The first step in determining legislative intent is to look at the statutory language and if the words of the statute, construed according to their common and everyday meaning, are clear and unambiguous. . . .’” Johnson v. Mayor & City Council of Balt.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bryan S. Neiderhiser of Marcus & Mack Attorneys at Law in Indiana, Pennsylvania, represents clients in personal injury cases. His typical cases involve industrial accidents, medical malpractice, wrongful death, products liability, dangerous drugs or medical devices, premises liability, motor vehicle defects or animal attacks. Many of his clients are residents of Blair, Centre, Westmoreland, Armstrong, Bedford, Cambria, Clearfield, Elk, Huntington, Indiana, Jefferson and Somerset counties [1] or the Altoona and State College metropolitan areas. Prior to completing his Juris Doctor in 1997 at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Mr. Neiderhiser earned his Bachelor of Science in business management from Grove City College. In 1998,…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Damages The damage dispute Disputed was Proven by LM the total labor hours from the estimate provided by USAA was 19.4 based on 4 hours per day 5 days of rental is a reasonable rental. No reason was provided for the delay (part delay, ect) in agreement with the reductions of 178.26…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Peter Kohly Professor Lusk MGMT 340 Group 11 New Gen Case Summary My role in the New Gen skit was Abdul Balli. To prepare for the role of Abdul I took into account his experience and standing in New Gen. I also took into account the roles of other characters in New Gen such as Hahn Chen and Amie Lee. From the beginning, I knew that in order to fill Abdul’s role, I would need to be outgoing and assertive for both the sake of the storyline but also…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsimhoni Case Summary

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the United Supreme Court case Michigan judge Gorcyca abused her power on the bench in Tsimhoni Case. The three children repeatedly stated that her father, Omer Tsimhoni, was an abuser. While on the other hand he claimed his ex-wife was alienating him from his children. After Judge Daniel Ryan heard the case, a retired judge, in June 2016 he found that Judge Gorcya had violated judicial code of conduct by inappropriate conduct in the court room. He also found that she has violated all three children’s due process because even though there was no order for them to spend time with their father she still found them guilty of contempt of court.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays