Tsimhoni Case Summary

Improved Essays
In the United Supreme Court case Michigan judge Gorcyca abused her power on the bench in Tsimhoni Case. The three children repeatedly stated that her father, Omer Tsimhoni, was an abuser. While on the other hand he claimed his ex-wife was alienating him from his children. After Judge Daniel Ryan heard the case, a retired judge, in June 2016 he found that Judge Gorcya had violated judicial code of conduct by inappropriate conduct in the court room. He also found that she has violated all three children’s due process because even though there was no order for them to spend time with their father she still found them guilty of contempt of court. LT was found in direct civil contempt by Judge Gorcyca who stated, “The court find you in direct contempt. I ordered you to have a healthy relationship with your father….I …show more content…
This was also stated without any further inquiry. There was also no contempt like refusing to speak to his father outside the court’s instant presence would have been considered indirect anyways and not a direct contempt with no order regarding LT for June twenty fourth. Gorcyca’s expression of language in the June twenty third order conveys that LT was not scheduled for any parenting time until July fourteenth. He had only accompanied his mother to court when she brought the two younger siblings but that had been it. Whether the judge correctly understood or employed civil or criminal contempt or whether it was direct or indirect contempt was not relevant to the subject. The point was that Judge Gorcyca improperly used her power and deprived LT from his liberty when she found LT in contempt on June twenty fourth. They had held him custody until the date of July tenth for doing something she had not even ordered LT to do in the June twenty third

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    1. Goods versus Services. A. ISSUE: Discuss fully whether the contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of goods or the sale of serv¬ices. The contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of services because the Palermos orally agreed to the purchase and installation of the carpet.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A former church pastor and his wife were arrested by police on June 16 for bringing their baby daughter with them while they were drinking and smoking at a bar in Indianapolis. According to a probable cause affidavit obtained by AL.com, police went to the Wild Beaver Saloon in Indianapolis after someone reported that a woman was soliciting customers in exchange for beer and breastfeeding while drinking alcoholic beverages. Shari Tremba, 42, tested 0.193 after a Breath Alcohol Content test. Michael Trosclair, 45, a former senior pastor at a church in Theodore, was reportedly visibly intoxicated.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tichenor Case Summary

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Tichenor, the court found substantial harm. Id. at 178. In Tichenor, the plaintiff’s were unable to perform yard work, plant flowers or enjoy their porch because of the volume of the dogs’ barks. Id. at 175. The court reasoned the volume of the noise was more than a slight inconvenience because a normal person should be able to use their property at will without being interrupted by a neighbor.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He kept getting abused, even to the point of profound mental disability, and the father was sent to prison. Joshua’s mother sued the Department of Social Services in Winnebago, saying they violated the fourteenth amendment and did not look into the case enough (by returning…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The critical implications of the decision of Haque & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1765 (2 July 2015) in terms of the binding nature of opinions of Medical Officers of the Commonwealth (“MOC”) appointed by the Minister, are as it is stated in regulation 2.25A of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) the (“Regulations”). In that the opinion of the MOC is to be taken as to be correct in determining whether a person meets the requirements of Public Interest Criteria (“PIC”) 4005. The delegate of the Minister is not to form their own opinion on whether or not an applicant meets the requirements of PIC 4005.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of the proceeding in the case of Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G is an appeal. The name of the court hearing the proceedings was called the Manitoba Court of Appeal. The judges writing the majority decision are: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L’Heureux-Dube, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin,…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A case that starts in 1990 regarding research on the the Havasupai Indians is a great example of the flaws that can occur with broad consent. Many members of the Havasupai tribe willingly gave their DNA to researchers in the hope of finding out about the frequency of diabetes and the importance that is has on their rapidly decreasing population. When the members of the tribe signed the agreement, they consented to studies on “the causes of behavioral/medical disorders.” However, because of both the broad terms of their consent, and the fact that English is not the primary language spoken by most of the members, the Havasupai Indians were rightfully upset when they were presented with information that did not pertain to the relationship between diabetes and their tribe.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, in this trial, the implications of an elected versus appointed judge can be seen. Judge Horton did the right thing by overturning the conviction of Haywood Patterson, he did so at great risk. Horton, an elected judge, basically ended his career with this move. It is this situation that leads me to believe that judges should be appointed rather than elected. Not every judge, especially when put in a situation like this, would have the integrity to ignore the political ramifications of their decision.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Givhan sued the school board, claiming that officials terminated her employment for exercising her First Amendment rights to free speech. Findings of Lower Courts: The lower courts ruled that Givhan’s freedom of speech had been violated, and it ordered her reinstatement. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, however, reversed for the board. The district court consequently…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dr. Kalahasthy’s office called about a CMN that was sent over and said that it states the patient is deceased. They called the patient and she was very upset that we had sent this to them. I think maybe someone put “d/c’ed” on the fax cover sheet and they took that as “deceased” but I’m not sure. I don’t really know what to do to rectify this situation. The patient called and spoke with PAC team who told her they don’t show anything in Brightree.…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Joyner V. Joyner Essay

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Good morning. My name is James Davis, and I am the prosecutor representing Jane Smith, age 36 of Raleigh, North Carolina. Our honorable judge, I trust that you will engage in the entire judging process in a rational, complete way, just as you would as the chief evaluator of any other case under your jurisdiction. After applying relevant rules and significant precedents to our current case, you will undoubtedly arrive at a solution where you will inevitably side with either the husband, the wife, or remain neutral and keep the government out from locked doors and closed curtains. Bear in mind, however, that many precedents in the past may look the same on paper, but are vastly different from what we are due to discuss in this particular courtroom.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good morning ladies and gentlemen of the jury. We are here today to address the case of Alexandra Finch versus Atticus J. Finch. The plaintiff is seeking legal custody of Scout and Jem Finch, on the allegation that their father is a neglectful and absent guardian, therefore rendering him unfit to raise them. My client should continue to have legal custody of his children for he provides them with adequate care and useful life lessons.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Savitri Bhama

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Which was then appealed and reversed and sent back for an evidentiary hearing. After the hearing, the plaintiff had custody of one child and the defendant had custody of the other. When appealed the court gave custody of both children to the defendant. Procedural History…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In March 1868 on Salt Spring Island, the dead body of William Robinson was discovered in his home. This was the third such murder of a black man on Salt Spring Island in a period of two years. An indigenous man named Tshuanahusset was accused, and found guilty of the murder fifteen months later. This essay will discuss, the evidence and testimonies given, the reasons Tshuanahusset was found guilty, and pose the opinion that there was not enough evidence to convict Tshuanahusset, and that John Norton and Sue Tas were responsible for framing Tshuanahusset, if not responsible for the murder itself. This is a mystery filled with suspicious circumstances, and minimal evidence.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Name of the Case: Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748, 2005. 2. Facts: After her divorce, Jessica Gonzales was granted a restraining order against her ex-husband by a state trial court in Colorado. The restraining order prohibited the ex-husband from disturbing Ms. Gonzales and her three daughters and ordered him to stay at least 100 yards away from the family home. The ex-husband / father was granted visits with his children on alternating weekends, for two weeks in the summer and for occasional mid-week visits if prearranged between the parents.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays