Moral Subjectivist Research Paper

Decent Essays
After reading the basic moral concepts and doing further research I would consider myself a Moral Subjectivist. A Moral Subjectivist holds that "rights" and "wrongs" vary among humans and cultures based on individual feelings and social and other circumstances. I believe that humans all over the world have different experiences and cultivation. Not everyone is comparable and every human has a distinct way of viewing and perceiving whether I or others think is right or wrong. For example, a young African boy and his family were disciplined with "good" morals such as respecting neighbors, each other, and helping the community thrive. Suddenly a war lord comes and begins to terrorize the small community and murders the young boys' father and brother at point blank range. He runs off and meets a tribe who is fighting the war lord and murdering his comrades in order to win back their territory and freedom. The young boy who never thought of or was put in a position to kill is now a gunman. Yes, murdering is wrong in particular circumstances, however, for this boy in order for his tribe,culture, and he himself to survive they had a right to fight back. Another example would be the holocaust, the Nazi's thought that killing Jewish people was the "right" thing to do. A Moral Subjectivist in that era, perhaps …show more content…
If you take the holocaust example and the Abraham Lincoln example, you would realize that circumstances change and humans have different thoughts, feelings, and opinions regardless of the time period and location. Although we might not relate or see eye to eye with others "rights" and wrongs" they exist and are deeply real to them regardless of our own moral judgements. What I consider to be "right" or "wrong" might not be what the person next to me considers to be "right" or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Stalin, also known as the man of steel, was known as a god among his people and still can remembered as one today. However, were his views on the world and racial profiling correct? Think about it, Stalin killed well over 53 million based on religion, race, and stupidity. Many would argue that Stalin was an evil man, but I disagree. Stalin stepped up to the plate to what he had to.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Subjectivism is an individualized idea and all principles are right or wrong based on someone’s own ideas therefore there is no room for judgement. Similar to that is conventionalism, which is based on cultural principles as everything must be judged based on that cultures ideas. As stated earlier, they overlap as they both lead to the lack of morality, leaving ethical relativism incoherent. I would completely agree with Pojman as he talks about why ethical relativism cannot fully be supported by either subjectivism or conventionalism. I also agree with Pojman because there are universal values that may not be written down, but have the same meaning worldwide such as killing other people, telling the truth, and stealing.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery And Morality

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Can a murderer’s philosophy be moral? Some of life 's hardest problems require one to take a moral stance on an issue. The difficult part is not the action of taking the stance, but figuring out if that stance would be seen as moral. The morality of such stances cause debates all over the world, as the morality of the stance can differ from person to person. As Benedict states, “A normal action is one which falls well within the limits of expected behavior for a particular society,” and the expected behavior for such society can be seen as a list of criteria that is always changing because of culture (137).…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Depending on each person’s different values and life experiences they interpret ethical norms and balance them in different ways. For example, two people could agree that murder is wrong but disagree about the correctness of abortion because they have different understandings of what it means to be a human being…

    • 50 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moral Theory By Rachels

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In our textbook, Rachels argues that people require humility and the understanding of where they stand in the universe. He believes that we should treat people the way they deserve to be treated and that we should hope these actions are reciprocated onto us. He believes that there are multiple strategies in finding where we are in life, such as comparing one’s life to that of other’s. We must know that we are not alone in this world and that we have an obligation in taking care of others. Rachels believes that we are rewarded for our work and self-improvement, but not our luck.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Professor Ervin Staub, the author of The Psychology of Good and Evil, “intense violence...is not evil, but justified self-defense in response to unjustified attack” (Staub 5). The Man kills only in self-defense for the Boy; he doesn’t do it out of sadism or the enjoyment of killing people. The loss of the Boy would be tragic as he serves as the Man’s conscience and therefore a reminder of the Man’s humanity. Without the Boy, his morals might waver since he won’t be held responsible for any unethical decisions he might make. Being selfless for another and actively maintaining another’s humanity and…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In ethics, an ethical relativist is a person who belief that the definition of something right or wrong depends on the prevailing view of a specific person, an historical period or a culture. An ethical egoist is the normative position in which a moral agent ought to do what is in his or her own self-interest. In other words, do something that will put you in a position to gain power. A moral perfectionist is when someone continually tries to obtain the optimal quality of spiritual, mental, physical and…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I believe that I am a moral objectivism. I believe that just because of someones cultures or beliefs it does not make it okay to be held to different standards. People tend to use their culture as an excuse to do certain things. Some cultures believe that cows are very sacred. Some people in go above and beyond to protect the cows and if someone is to harm those animals they can deal with very severe consequence.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Objectivist and Subjectivist Objectivist views problems objectively harmful if they carry negative or harmful consequences. Not just for individuals, but also for the individual’s social and physical life. For example, we can safely say that crime is a social problem because it causes thousands of injuries and deaths every year. Billions of dollars and other measurable damages result from violent crime throughout the country. This way of thinking sees harmful conditions that could be measured objectively using a systematic scientific approach.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Both Mary Midgley and John Arthur have respective solutions towards this controversial issue. Moral relativism has the idea of moral isolationism. Anything in your culture goes; outsiders have no room to criticize about that culture, because they lack knowledge about how that culture functions. This is considered a general ban on moral reasoning.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 4 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors examine the philosophical question whether morality depends on religion. They noted that in popular thinking, morality and religion are inseparable and that people generally accept that morality can be understood only in the framework of religion. On the other hand, from the perspective of the atheist or non religious people, the world is full of evil and in total chaos. Furthermore, the concept behind an all loving God and the ultimate rule maker of the moral code depicts the theory of Divine Command. The Divine Command Theory postulates that the question of what is morally right is commanded by God, and morally wrong is forbidden by God and draws a conclusion that the objectivity problem in ethics seems to be solved.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism is the view that “some moral rules really are correct, and that these determine which moral claims are true and which false.”…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We live in a society that have different moral differences. It is hard for people to actually understand the concept of right and wrong. Because, not everyone shares the same idea of what constitutes decent behavior. Rosenstand has four major paths to choose from. There is nihilism, ethical relativism, soft universalism, and hard universalism.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What is my moral philosophy? I have rarely given this question any consideration, attempted to codify, or label such a concept. I don’t think I consciously realized such a thing actually existed, let alone recognized an ability to define it. My lack of self-awareness is most shocking to nobody more than myself, given I participate in two highly trusted professions within our society: a military officer and a civil engineer2.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays