Difference Between Relativism And Objectivism

Improved Essays
Relativism vs. Objectivism
There are two different theories dealing with morality, what is right or wrong, and what is good or bad. The theories discussed will be, ethical relativism and ethical objectivism. Ethical relativism is defined as having no absolute stance on a position; there is no right or wrong. Ethical objectivism which claims that some moral rules really are correct. What would it mean for ethics if there were no absolutes? The answer would mean the relativist would change the entire meaning of ethics. Both relativism and objectivism are debated as to which is morally correct. I will discuss both theories and give my opinion on which theory I hold. Both will be discussed and my opinion will be provided on which I hold to be morally correct.
Ethical relativism is the view that “some moral rules really are correct, and that these determine which moral claims are true and which false.”
…show more content…
No matter what we think or believe, things are what they are because that is how they exist in the universe. There is a higher power who says what is morally good and how we should live our lives.
If I had to respond to an opposing argument, I would have to say that you cannot have a cookie cutter approach to morality. Society needs rules to function because they are absolutes, providing a structure we can all live by. Without rules you have conflict, with conflict you have chaos, and when you have chaos you live in a dangerous world.
I spoke about the two theories of moral standards: Ethical relativism and Ethical objectivism. The theory of Ethical Objectivism is one that I relate to because some rules are correct, and these determine which moral claims are true and which are false. No matter what we think or believe, things are what they are because that is how they exist in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When defining morality it is important to “recognize the existence of significant variation in what rules and ideals different people put forward as morality.” However, in philosophy, the ethical system which makes the best case for what morality is really about it would be Deontology rather than Consequentialism. This is because deontologists are concerned with doing the right thing because it is what is ultimately morally good which is more ethical than defining what is right by whether or not an act results in a positive consequence. “Ethics, also called moral philosophy, [is] the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong.” The categorical imperative and other deontological teachings fit neatly into the definition of ethics since the top priority is to always do what is right before being concerned with anything else. Deontology defines what morality is really about because taking the most ethical approach is what a deontologist values most, the same cannot be said for a consequentialist, which makes deontology superior to consequentialism from a moral and ethical…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Normative theories of ethics are meant to assist in the discovery of what is right and wrong. These moral theories rely on principles that determine whether an action is right or wrong. Some normative theories include utilitarianism, virtue ethics, W.D. Ross’s intuitonism, the categorical imperative, or deontology. Ethics is often used interchangeably with morality so it is not too surprising to learn ethics addresses questions of morality in philosophy.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ethics, ethical theories involve the basic concept of wrong and right behavior. There are two types of groups of ethical theories. These theories are consequential and nonconsequential. Consequential principles judge ethics on a certain action by the outcome of that action meaning the overall consequence. Consequential Ethics, determine what is ‘morally right’ and ‘morally wrong’ of the action that is occurring and is than determined by the rate of good to bad that a given action would make.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether we feel against or not we know the morally right thing and it’s our duty to care out our action. Apart from what is in the sense of good will nothing else is considered to be good. He says that when guided to do what’s good in by morality there is no seeking for the reward. The simple reward is doing the right thing. When based off of feelings as for a reward for doing the right thing then it is not morality.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral rightness, or ethics is a branch of philosophy that studies and determines what is right and what is wrong. Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that studies reality in the universe. The question of whether or not an act has to be universally right entails the knowledge of both studies, and in order to answer it you must know the difference between right and wrong, and the reality of what people should do in circumstances, if there is one. According to Kant, metaphysics is intuition-based as well as based on synthetic a priori judgements. This means that the truth of what is right or wrong is strictly undetermined by external stimuli, predispositions, or emotions during the situation.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Act Deontology is when no ethical rules to be followed when making an ethical decision. Rule Deontology is when there are rules to be followed while making the ethical decisions. Just like a coin Deontology has two sides- advantageous side and disadvantageous side. The benefit with Deontology is that it supports an action and intention to determine the moral worth of an action. The…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also moral theory explains actions from being right and wrong and why they take that action. Some suspended opinions being brought up are how moral philosophy…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It differs in that ethics is the philosophical and scientific study of the moral and theoretical while morality is practical. Ethics is about right and depends on the philosophy and moral change is the behavior that is our life. Etymologically "ethical" and "moral" have the same meaning. "Moral" comes from Latin "mos" which means habit or custom; and "ethics" from the Greek "ethos" which means the same. But now they have come to mean different things and refer to areas or different levels.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The first type is the Consequentialists theories, which are primarily related to the ethical consequences of particular actions. These theories state that if the consequences are good, the action is right; if they are bad, the action is wrong. The Second type is the Non-Consequentialist theories, which consider the rightness or wrongness of an act, system of rules, etc. depends, at least in part, on something other than the goodness or badness of the consequences. Each of these categories contains varieties of approaches to ethics, some of which share characteristics across the…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This account of moral knowledge differs from other accounts given because of the way it views morality and what it deems as morally right. Consequentialism said that morality of an action depend on its results. If good came out of the action, despite the fact that the fact may be questionable, then what the person has done is morally right. Kant’s duty based ethics view said that morality was based on intentions that were universalizability. Virtue ethics deems that morality is gained through experience, training, and…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics