Mock Jury Process

Superior Essays
Prior to the mock jury activity in class, I did not know or understand much about the judicial or trial process. In this paper, I will just summarize the trial, my thoughts on the jury process and if I think justice is achieved through these systems. I have been in a court situation before where I have needed to testify, so I understand a bit more about the trial system than someone who hasn’t experienced it. The mock trial was a very engaging and helpful activity where I was able to more fully understand what happens in a trial. I was able to put myself in the juror’s shoes and to feel how tough of a decision it is because someone’s life is in your hands. The situation in this trial was that Mr. Sanchez (the defendant) killed a man, by the name of Mr. Botello. Mr. Sanchez claims he stabbed Mr. Botello to defend himself, but the prosecutors think …show more content…
I think that the procedures that affect the search for truth is the jury selection system. I don’t believe we should remove someone from the jury for working in the legal system. It seems like they would want someone on the jury who is familiar with the legal system and would be qualified to make a fair, honest decision. I also thought it would very odd when Mr. Sanchez’s lawyer told him what to say and how to act on the stand. It seems like to me they would want the real reaction of the defendant rather than a manipulated version of the defendant. Our jury arrived at the same verdict that the real jury chose, but I am not completely convinced it was the correct one. I think one could argue that he didn’t have a regard for someone’s life if he was willing to come in a house with a chainsaw, with the chance it could hurt someone. I, personally, would have argued it was second degree, but I could persuaded that it is manslaughter. I think it is tricky to tell the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jacobson arguing that the court had abused its discretionary powers when it did not allow Jacobson’s attorney’s to poll the jury, and instead assumed that the jurors had abided by the restrictions placed on them to avoid news reports. The due process clause guarantees everyone the right to a trial by an impartial jury, and this was denied to Sandra L. Jacobson when public broadcasting was clearly impartial towards the prosecution, and the jurors had the means to watch said report, which would render them biased. Legally, if there is the possibility that jurors may have been exposed to material that is prejudicial, then an appellate court should be able to gauge the exposure and determine the prejudice of the jury. The trial court was able to determine that unfair prejudice from this broadcasting station, including information that would be inadmissible in trial and would therefore contaminate the jury. Several cases have shown that warnings alone do not neutralize the potential for jury contamination, so a trial court should not rely solely on the warnings it gives jurors.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Runaway Jury

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    • In the legal context of the movie we have a case which involves a widow who is suing a gun manufacturer because her husband was killed in an office massacre involving an easily-obtained weapon. Throughout the movie we see that prior to this case there has been a handful of cases brought to this gun manufacturer and how their guns which they produce is sold in the black market or on the streets easily and also in store easily. The problem was how the gun manufacture never investigated how customers were coming to buy multiple automatic guns and it was never looked into. To help them win the gun manufactures hire Fitch who with their money buys some insurance by way of bribery and pressure on several of the jurors.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opinion Ms. Justice Martinez delivers the opinion of the court. Appellant stands convicted of murdering Mr. Thompkins and possession of an illegal firearm. The Supreme Court of New Jersey found the conviction valid based primarily upon the confession unlawfully obtained from the appellant and the evidence brought to the court which was also unlawfully collected at the victim’s home. On December 24, the Ocean County Sherriff’s department was called to a wellness check of Mr. Thompkins.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oj Simpson Fast Facts

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Following less than five hours of discussion on October 2, 1995, the jury returned to the courtroom the next morning to announce that they found the defendant not guilty of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Members of the jury felt that because the gloves did not fit on the Juice’s hands, he could not have been guilty of killing Nicole and Ron (“O.J. Simpson Fast Facts”). The prosecution felt defeated, while the defense rejoiced. The Brown and Goldman families were outraged, the Simpson family felt relief. The trial was over, but the fight would never end.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To great surprise the jury convicted Evans and Terry based on only one piece of evidence, the discredited testimony of Januszewski. This sheds light on a potential problem with our jury system in the U.S. Similar to what was described in the podcast The Life of the Law: Episode 1, The Secret Power of Jury Nullification, when juries decided the innocence of people who were clearly guilty, allowing them to avoid possibly unnecessary sentences (Heffernan, 2012). The jury in this case used their power to do the almost exact opposite. The jury’s thirst to find the people responsible for such a heinous crime in their community may have enticed them to convict the two boys with minimal evidence, promoting a sense of closure for the victims’ families and the community. Juries may also feel pressures of a community to swiftly close a case which could easily result in these wrongful convictions.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Run Away Jury Duty

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In reviewing this week’s assignment to watch the Hollywood film “Run Away Jury”, I became mesmerized with the impositions that are placed upon jurors in a trial. Am not discussing the inconveniences, such as being removed from their families/homes, cut out from knowledge of current events happening in their communities and being housed with twelve other people, of whom they may or may not get along with. I am discussing the obligations, in a court of law to be impartial and fair in coming to a judgement before the court that I have been asked to serve upon. Our chapter reading this week discussed that rights and duties have a mutual relationship, regardless whether they are moral or legal. Jurors are faced with the arduous task of determining…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kiara Rivas Philosophy 25 Due Date: 5/6/2015 Mock Trial: U.S v. Dominique Stephens The case I am presenting today is about a woman who admits to having killed her husband and is being charged with first degree murder. The woman’s name is Dominque Stephens and Mrs. Stephens claims that she has acted in self-defense after suffering many years of domestic violence in her marriage.…

    • 2831 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case in the “A Shot to the Heart” article, explains a man being convicted because he was picked by a witness in a line-up to have been seen involved in the crime. In reality the man who was picked looked identical to the actual man involved, but it was not him, both of these cases are unfair because neither of them give physical evidence indicating it was them who did the…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jury Trial Advantages

    • 1828 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jurors’ are lay members of the public who as a panel of human beings, are capable of judging guilt based on the facts as well as character, honesty and conscience. By representing society, they are able to add value to the system by making decisions based on a lived experience, using a moral compass developed through having been a member of society. Thus, trial by jury can be seen as symbol of reassurance and reinforces the justice system as not merely a process that decides guilt, but also, when considered amongst the morals of our society, if they are deserving of…

    • 1828 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jurors, probably the most important aspect of the criminal justice system, in itself. The American justice system, is built on the idea that justice is blind, therefore, justice is fair, however, it is the jury that ensures that fairness, with that said, it is understandable how one’s bias can compromise the criminal justice system. Therefore, jurors are faced with their own personal bias, moreover, they struggle with their decisions due to personal beliefs, some of which may not be ethical. It is clear, that the adversarial, or adversary system, allows for the most transparent and fair process that exist on this planet, just ask the People’s Republic of…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Is A Jury Trial

    • 72 Words
    • 1 Pages

    A jury trial is a trial in which a group of random people chosen from the community, decides whether the evidence presented to them is valid. Based on the evidence, the jury reaches a verdict and decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty and the judge will decide the appropriate sentence. The purpose of a jury trial is to address the issues of a dispute between two or more parties.…

    • 72 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “It took them only a short time to reach their verdict. “Guilty of murder in the first degree,” said the foreman of the jury” (David 15). The jury disregarded all of the reasonable doubt shown, and declared them guilty without even much deliberation. Despite this verdict, the defense had expected this and were ready to appeal the verdict. New evidence arose after the trial, and this evidence should have cleared the two of all guilt.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Developed trustworthiness between jurors is an ice-breaker encourage to discuss the case fairly and without prejudging the…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The general argument made by Paul Mendelle in his work is that juries promote democracy and give a taste of judicial system to ordinary, everyday people. More specifically Mendelle argues that juries are the most fair, effective, and efficient system to convict people of crimes they have or have not committed. He writes “ There is no other part of the constitution that is so open to the public, where ordinary people participate in decisions of suc immediate importance and wield real power. ”(line 23-25) In this passage Mendelle is suggesting that in the court system people of all kinds are able to obtain control of another person’s fate and that this is the system that is working for our democratic country.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics