Run Away Jury Duty

Improved Essays
In reviewing this week’s assignment to watch the Hollywood film “Run Away Jury”, I became mesmerized with the impositions that are placed upon jurors in a trial. Am not discussing the inconveniences, such as being removed from their families/homes, cut out from knowledge of current events happening in their communities and being housed with twelve other people, of whom they may or may not get along with. I am discussing the obligations, in a court of law to be impartial and fair in coming to a judgement before the court that I have been asked to serve upon. Our chapter reading this week discussed that rights and duties have a mutual relationship, regardless whether they are moral or legal.

Jurors are faced with the arduous task of determining

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California elicits the concept of duty. Tatiana Tarasoff, a young, single woman is unaware that she is being stalked by her aggressive ex-lover. The ex-boyfriend Prosenjit Poddar, has been seeing a psychologist to deal with his grief from the break-up, and during a therapy session he makes an indication that he wants to teach his former lover a violent lesson. His psychologist becomes torn between preserving his patient’s confidentiality and attempting to protect young Tarasoff. He makes the decision to inform local police of Poddars possible revenge, but does not warn Tarasoff to be careful.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This amendment lays out a person ’s right to a trial by jury. It tempers the law to community standards by having a person’s "peers" decide who is right and who is wrong. This amendment permits for the difference between physical and social circumstances in each community. For example, in a small town, failure to shovel the snow off the side walk is not big thing.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Professor of Law at George Mason University wrote an article about the jury nullification in the Washington Post. In it he focuses of various aspects that make this process so interesting and contradicting. The author give his personal view on jury nullification and his initial attitude toward it. Jury nullification can be seen as a two edged sword, because it is not applied on constant and consistent basis. The author, Ilya Somin agrees that it can curb unjust laws, however it can backfire.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Secret Power of Jury Nullification Response In the Podcast “The Life of the Law, Episode 1, The Secret Power of Jury Nullification”, Shannon Heffernan explains the often overlook power of jury nullification in the U.S. court system. She defines nullification as, when a jury is convinced that a defendant is guilty but find the defendant innocent anyway. Heffernan provides examples of cases throughout history that aid the idea that nullification among juries can potentially benefit courtroom justice. She also weights its negative effects that cause potentially major injustices in courtrooms.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We all have the privilege to be attempted by our associates, and it is a thoughtful approach to include the group in regulating equity. There are circumstances in which the law is unjust, and it is the duty of a member of the jury to speak to the supposition of the general population. Serving as a Jury was a reasonable way for me to maintain an individual liberty and just to watch out for the government: making sure it doesn 't push unjust laws on fellow citizens. These reasons drove me to participate in the American University mock trial that was held at the Montgomery County judicial center in Rockville.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Accordingly the 5th jurors background aids him in making a wise decision. Ultimately, Rose has clearly explained that personal experience is an important aspect that influences the human decision-making processes. This is ascertained when the 3rd Juror’s agonizing experience with his son forces him to vote for guilty, the 9th juror’s old age grants him wisdom and insight and the 5th Juror’s life in a slum allows him to make a sound decision. Therefore personal experience is a very important factor that affects a person’s…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Part One: Is sequestration of the jury for the duration of the trial necessary considering the influence of social media? I. Overview: The rapid evolution of social media and accessibility of internet in the recent decades have posed a severe challenge to criminal trial proceedings. Social media makes infinite information accessible in mere seconds. Jurors, like other individuals have become accustomed to using social media to conduct research and communicate with family, friends and a large audience. Jurors can access or be exposed to countless information about a pending case through social media.…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A fundamental aspect of the American justice system is the right of every person accused of a crime, to a trial by jury. The defendant, presumed ‘innocent until proven guilty’, has the right to be judged by a group of his or her peers based on the evidence presented, the assumption being that the defendant will be judged in a fair and impartial manner. However, human beings are fallible and can be subject to faulty reasoning, alongside irrational and biased thinking. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose is set in a mid twentieth century American jury room. Twelve strangers, all male, are brought together to deliberate the facts of a seemingly straightforward case, a young man accused of murdering his father; their decision, which must be unanimous, will either take, or save a young mans life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Today I spent the day doing researching legal rights. Find one that interests you. Why? The Fifth Amendment the Fifth Amendment provides several protections for people accused of crimes.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine, you have lived your life without cause, you are a law abiding citizen, you have never been in trouble, furthermore, your life is established, your married, you have kids, the perfect job, life is excellent. Then one day, by haps, you are stopped, detained, arrested, charged with a crime, not just a crime, a violent crime, a crime that is unspeakable, child molestation! Your life is upside down, your wife, your family, your friends, even your co-workers all look at you differently. However, your innocent, and you protest such, to everyone who is willing to listen to you, however, you cannot get over the fact that no one is listening to your cries, now your life is in the hands of strangers, a prosecutor, defense attorney, judge, and…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the juror, Juror #3, passionately wanted to execute the young man for his deeds. This juror was unsympathetic due to his personal grudge. He did not have a good relationship with his son and his son left him; this young man reminded him of his son. Although Juror #3 insisted that he was basing his decision on facts, he brought personal matters into the jury even when the facts were refuted. The defendant exhibited similarities to Juror #3’s son, which led to the tendency of this juror to treat the defendant less favorably.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The importance given to their personal values and life experiences, in fact, played a crucial role in determining how fair, and conflicting the outcome of ethical decision making was, as initially, they were not giving the boy a chance to a fair trial. The juror’s job was to compare facts, look at the evidence discussing among themselves. By considering only the most obvious aspects in order to make a certain decision is never an ideal outcome or fair for the accused. Some jurors, especially number three was judging about the boy by comparing their circumstances with their own circumstances. They were especially looking for every negative circumstance to conclude the…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays