Evaluating the Current Managerial Structure
In the light of Bragg and Roehl-Anderson (2011), management is a synergy of four aspects, which includes planning, organizing, leading and controlling. All these elements are essential in order to manage companies as well their employees. According to Hull, (2014), organizations that have strong managerial structures usually have powerful and efficient employees compared to organizations that have weaker managerial structures. A good managerial structure not only brings positivity to the performance of the employees, but it can also help the managers to tackle the different operations of the company (Korzynski, 2013). The managerial structure or decision-making power of every company differs, as every company has different strategies to make its business grow. According to the case study, the company began with one man; Barker. He quickly expanded to have 19 employees under him. Barker remains the proprietor, but because the …show more content…
This can be a de-motivating factor for the employees because they might feel that their opinions aren’t valued or they are not considered an important aspect of the company. This would in turn have employees not working to the best of their abilities which as identified in the case study is affecting the overall company. The lack of communication between these three groups is creating issues in terms of quality of what is produced by the machinists and the time scales that the fitting teams have because of promises made by the sales staff. The lack of understanding between these three teams is creating arguments within the workplace as to who is to blame. This can create a very negative work environment, which would make employees less reluctant to care for the company itself as they might feel disrespected in the
In the light of Bragg and Roehl-Anderson (2011), management is a synergy of four aspects, which includes planning, organizing, leading and controlling. All these elements are essential in order to manage companies as well their employees. According to Hull, (2014), organizations that have strong managerial structures usually have powerful and efficient employees compared to organizations that have weaker managerial structures. A good managerial structure not only brings positivity to the performance of the employees, but it can also help the managers to tackle the different operations of the company (Korzynski, 2013). The managerial structure or decision-making power of every company differs, as every company has different strategies to make its business grow. According to the case study, the company began with one man; Barker. He quickly expanded to have 19 employees under him. Barker remains the proprietor, but because the …show more content…
This can be a de-motivating factor for the employees because they might feel that their opinions aren’t valued or they are not considered an important aspect of the company. This would in turn have employees not working to the best of their abilities which as identified in the case study is affecting the overall company. The lack of communication between these three groups is creating issues in terms of quality of what is produced by the machinists and the time scales that the fitting teams have because of promises made by the sales staff. The lack of understanding between these three teams is creating arguments within the workplace as to who is to blame. This can create a very negative work environment, which would make employees less reluctant to care for the company itself as they might feel disrespected in the