Jury Judgment In Reginald Rose's 12 Angry Men

In a courtroom, there are many differents components that make a case. A Judge, A Jury, Prosecution and a Defense. The play 12 Angry Men by: Reginald Rose, she showed that there was 2 jurors that were very hard to work with in the 3rd and 10th juror. To understand 12 Angry Men Better, you need to look at the little things that described and that made the jury.
There are many different ways that a trial can go wrong. An inadequate lawyer, jury dismissal, wrongful conviction, bad evidence. One of the most important reasons is jury dismissal. “A request that a prospective juror be dismissed because there is a specific and forceful reason to believe the person cannot be fair, unbiased or capable of serving as a juror. (Legal Dictionary)” This quote states that reasons that a juror may be dismissed is …show more content…
“Yeah, well I've got (a kid). He's twenty. We did everything for that boy, and what happened? When he was nine he ran away from a fight. I saw him. I was so ashamed I almost threw up. So I told him right out. "I'm gonna make a man outta your or I'm gonna bust you in half trying." Well, I made a man outa him all right. When he was sixteen we had a battle. He hit me in the face. He's big, y'know. I haven't seen him in two years. Rotten kid. You work your heart out...[He breaks off. He has said more than he intended. He is embarrassed.] All right. Let's get on with it” (Rose). Juror 3 was very hard to work with because he took the case to close to his personal life with his kid that was very relatable to the kid who was on trial. Juror 3 was the final juror to change the vote from guilty to not guilty. He had a nervous breakdown because the others jurors finally showed him how the kid was not guilty. At the end of the book, the kid was found not guilty of his crime according to the