Justice In 12 Angry Men By Reginald Rose

Improved Essays
According to “12 Angry Men’’ by Reginald Rose, Justice is something that is affected by race and experiences that's not guaranteed to everyone, because there need to be someone who stands up to injustice. These issues cause many innocent people to do time in jail, lose jobs ,and even lose their life which hurt many families before and years to come.
For example, People can get a unfair trial because of faulty eyewitness testimony. In the 12 angry man All of the eyewitnesses seem to be unreliable, the 8th juror says”the body falling a split second later, would have to hear the boy make the statement while the el train was roaring past his nose. It's not possible the man could've heard it. That eyewitnesses can make the wrong mistake and convince jurors and ruin people's life. This show that justice is not guaranteed because not all eyewitnesses will tell the truth and this can cause jurors to make mistakes.
…show more content…
In the passage the 8th jurors says “weren't you the one just a minute or two ago that you can't trust them”. That jurors cannot be fair and puts people in groups and allow stereotypes affect his opinion. This does not guarantee justice for all because someone can be racist and give the defendant an unfair trial.
Furthermore, the defendant also receive unfair trial because jurors let their experiences affect their decision in 12 angry man one of the jurors had a stereotype for young because his issues with his son, the 3rd juror says “it's the kids, the way they are now days. Angry! Hostile!”This shows that jurors won't be as reliable as people think because they won't call the case by facts but by stereotypes. These bad experiences the jurors had with a certain age, race ,gender of people can negatively and unfairly affect the defendant trials because they might hold strong hateful stereotypes about one's race or

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This demonstrates prejudice because according to the 8th Juror, the 3rd Juror is being prejudice since he just desires the boy’s death for his own personal reasons. Additionally, the fact that he doesn’t refute it shows that it is probably true. Another time when the 3rd Juror demonstrates prejudice is at the end of the story. He states, “The phrase was “I’m gonna kill you.” That’s what he said.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Surely, there was a “white perspective” in the Bryant-Milam trial, indirectly influencing the courts proceedings and final judgements. This prejudice was evident as one of the defence attorneys declared that “After the jury was chosen, any first-year law student could have won the case.”. Essentially, the entrenched racial stereotypes exploit the characteristics of a geographic region, ostracizing black individuals from the the region’s legal processes. Another element of a fair trial is the neutrality of the witness panel. During a witnesses testimony, witnesses are asked to reiterate their experiences with respects to the crime.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bench Trial Dbq

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the last 250 years, U.S. citizens have been given a controversial option of a jury or bench trial. Not everyone agrees with the bench trials. Although jury trials sound like a good idea, it is actually true that bench trials are better because it guarantees the right verdict almost all the time. Jury trials choose ordinary citizens off the street. For example, with the society today, people cannot stay off their phone, which makes them vulnerable to hearing or gathering false details about the trial.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Juror 8

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is an important point” (241). His quiet, yet well-rounded personality generates sympathy and admiration among readers; thus, creating pathos. Juror 11’s history proves beneficial to the case, for he understands racial prejudice as much as the boy on trial does; thus, contributing to the overal ethos and logos, as well. For these reasons, readers congratulate Reginald Rose for his syntactical expertise and ability to reveal ethos, pathos, and logos with mere grammatical configurations. Twelve Angry Men is a simple play, yet its many components make it beneficial to education and memorable.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Holloway pointed out, eyewitness testimony plays a significant role in sending innocent people to prison (Holloway, 2015). Yet, I feel that she only vaguely covered the topic. Because eyewitness testimony is a major component of the American criminal justice system, Holloway should have better emphasized the faultiness of eyewitness…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Silvia Mazzula's Jury Bias

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the article, Jury Bias: Can You Argue the Facts When Race Enters the Mix, the author Silvia L. Mazzula tells us the truth that sometimes decisions from jurors are based on more than just facts. They are likely to be influenced by race, even though they don’t really notice that. The author firstly puts forward some public’s controversy about this kind of unfairness. The whole article is based on a study, in this study, we can see the jury bias does exist. Since we notice that situation, we need to try our best to improve racism through effective ways.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atticus Finch Justice

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the courtroom justice knows no racial difference, gender, nor emotion, justice is based on facts and evidence. In Harper Lee’s book To Kill A Mockingbird Atticus Finch makes this argument showing us his belief in the Justice system and the trust he places on the jury. Atticus enforces his ideas by providing convincing evidence and reason. Atticus urges the jury to use common sense and not to base their decision on racial prejudice. For example, Atticus states “It has relied instead upon the testimony of two witnesses whose evidence has not only been called into serious question on cross-examination, but has been flatly contradicted” (L14-17)…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Non Unanimous Jury System

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In conclusion, as the author and Justice William Douglas promote, the idea of a non-unanimous jury system for criminal cases can be assumed to be a biased legal system when concerning minorities. Even the juries inclined to be mostly white and male, which has been pointed out by the author and Harvard’s Carles Ogletree. Ogletree argued that “non-unanimous jury [functionally silenced] the views of racial and ethnic minorities and women,” and that these juries “allowed prosecutors to keep one or two minorities on a jury without having to worry about their effect on the outcome of the trial” (58). Looking at the evidence in even contemporary cases such as Derrick Todd Lee of Baton Rouge in 2004, even though they could not find absolute evidence…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose brings us back in time to 1957, to a jury room of a New York Court of Law where one man, Juror #8, confronts the rest of the jury to look at a homicide case without prejudice, and ultimately convinces Juror #2, a very soft-spoken man who at first had little say in the deliberation. Throughout the play, several jurors give convincing arguments that make one think about whether the boy is “guilty” or “not guilty.” Ultimately, one is convinced by ethos, logos, and pathos. We can see ethos, logos, and pathos having an effect on Juror #2 as he begins as a humble man and changes into someone brave at the end. Although all three modes play a part in convincing Juror #2, pathos is the most influential because…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though many of the jurors still thought the man was guilty. They still engaged in the discussion. The discussion then shifted towards playing out the scenario. It was at this point that, jurors started to change their minds. Hey could have replayed the same scenario over and over again.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight appealed to the jury’s values. He told a story about the innocent boy (innocent when he was young) being harmed as he was growing up. The boy was beaten by his dad when he was young. Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine, you have lived your life without cause, you are a law abiding citizen, you have never been in trouble, furthermore, your life is established, your married, you have kids, the perfect job, life is excellent. Then one day, by haps, you are stopped, detained, arrested, charged with a crime, not just a crime, a violent crime, a crime that is unspeakable, child molestation! Your life is upside down, your wife, your family, your friends, even your co-workers all look at you differently. However, your innocent, and you protest such, to everyone who is willing to listen to you, however, you cannot get over the fact that no one is listening to your cries, now your life is in the hands of strangers, a prosecutor, defense attorney, judge, and…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main topics that was displayed in the movie was conformity. Conformity can be described as the act of changing one’s behavior to fit in with a group (Crutchfield, 1955). After the closing arguments of the trial, deliberations by the jurors begin on whether the boy is guilty or not. As the jurors make themselves comfortable in the jury room, casual exchanges are made between the jurors. This is where the first step of conformity takes place.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #8 In the play “Twelve Angry Men” the Juror No.8 was a very important character, without him there would not have been any conflict and the young boy would have been executed without a proper trial. An Architect by profession, he stood out from the rest of jurors. He had the gift for intuitive thinking, understanding complex human relationships and inspiring others. He believed in trial-by-jury system and did his best to have the necessary procedures to come up with a fair outcome.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “During the storming stage, group members are initially more anxious in their interactions with one another because they are afraid of losing control, being misunderstood, looking foolish, or being rejected” (Gladding, 2012, p. 108). There is quite a bit of anxiety among the jurors that appears as anger. Some of the jurors give the impression of being angry at the defendant, when they haven’t even reviewed all of the evidence. During their angry outbursts at the architect, they expose these true feelings. The angry man is the most defiant and resistant of the group.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays