Analysis: The Jury System

Great Essays
The Jury System by Kenneth Jost
Are major changes needed? Should peremptory challenges be abolished?

1. What is at issue? What is the claim behind this issue? Why is this important now? What impact will it have on the future?
- The proceeding issue deals with whether or not to abolish the peremptory challenges within the judicial system. Peremptory challenges allow attorneys to dismiss potential jurors without the inclusion of a reason as to why. The author includes one side that favors the abolishment of peremptory challenges due to the possibility of subjecting biases. Though, the author also includes the opposing point of view, including that of a prosecuting attorney, Michael D. Barnes. Barnes believes that peremptory challenges should
…show more content…
As a working prosecutor and an officer of the court, Barnes is to ensure that both the people and the accused receive a fair trial. In saying so, the best way that he knows how to achieve this is through the present judicial system, with all of its periodic aberrations. – Eliminating peremptory challenges if there is low confidence in the judicial court system may cause a greater downfall concerning trust. Perhaps jurors may not admit to any form of biases and/or fail to disclose accurate information without the process summoned under oath. – Questions concerning whether persons with specific mindsets on certain issues should be placed on the jury stand of similar court cases that opposes the persons’ principles (DWI case and the prison abolitionists). In such instances, those persons should not. Therefore, without peremptory challenges, the specter of unfairness could linger over the verdicts and further eroding community confidence in the justice …show more content…
Though, another may believe in the more liberal concept that perfection includes the inclusion of flaws, which can become quite convincing. In saying so, there is no one policy or law that should be narrowly subjected to the entirety of all judicial court cases. There is a need for some degree of flexibility in accordance to each individual court case, for no two cases are equal and just as no two persons are exactly alike, not even identical twins. A middle ground regarding the differing sides of the abolishment of peremptory challenges may be to keep the component a part of the judicial process with the requirement of impartial reasoning for dismissal of potential jurors. If not for the dismissal for cause, there can be an honorable third party’s involvement in jury selection instead of the prosecutors or defense lawyers of the specific case doing so themselves. Additionally, the starting number of potential candidates for a trial should be put into account depending on how big or how small the case may be, as high-profile cases may need more jurors than locally smaller cases. Consequently, those that are for the proposal will benefit in a way that both sides are less likely to be victims of discriminatory accusations. Furthermore, those that are against the proposal may move forward, though with a few modifications to the original idea of peremptory challenges. Those that are for the argument

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The courts biggest issues were trying to decide whether a trial court’s erroneous deprivation of a criminal defendant’s choice of counsel entitles him to a reversal of his conviction and should proving the sixth Amendment right to proceed with the counsel of choice depend on whether the deprivation of that right also resulted in compromising a defendants’ right to a fair trial. The majority opinion did not apply the Strickland test because they felt that the defendant could not show or give any reason as to why he felt the counsel was ineffective and that the counsels performance was poorly presented and deficient and the defendant was prejudiced by it. What the Strickland test is actually intended for is that the government must contend that the defendant must at least demonstrate that his counsel of choice would have pursued a different strategy and would have created a :reasonable probability”. In court cases the course can be split into two structures; trial errors and structural errors. Most constitutional errors are trial errors that occur “during the presentation to the jury,” and courts have discretion in deciding whether these trial errors are harmless and warrant a new trial.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Olaf Dietrich: Case Study

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Others, however, were not so approving of the decision. Concerns were raised as to the effect that this might have on available funds to legal aid bodies in general. Would the decision mean that funds would be diverted to criminal matters at the expense of family law and civil law matters? Some were concerned that the legal system would become clogged with defendants pleading not guilty rather than guilty, as was the previous requirement for receiving legal…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition, sometimes people that are involved in the case can be famous or well known. This could lead to threats because if the person is really powerful, he/she would threaten the judge. If it was a jury, it would be hard to threaten because you will not know who the citizens are in the jury until you walk into the court room. For example, Zenger printed a newspaper critical of the British…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, he has behaviour role which conflict and frustration taken in action has influence his judgement. Moreover, his stubborn and bad temper has effect his decision and drive his vote of guilty. The juror 3 grow angry and nearly attack juror 8 and this action has weakness his support between the jurors. The intuition or feeling which make decisions with heart and escalation of commitment bias which do not admitted to making a wrong decision.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The key topic that is under debate throughout this paper is jury nullification and how its procedures work within the justice system, as well as some of its strengths and weaknesses. There is quite a bit of controversy surrounding jury nullification being used as a primary rectification in the justice system as it tends to make equal outcomes become unequal outcomes. Jury nullification is a process in which a jury reaches a verdict of not guilty despite the fact that the defendant is actually guilty of the actions he or she is being charged for. The jury nullifies a law that is believed to be immorally wrong or wrongfully applied to the defendant.…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The grand jury’s main purpose is to screen cases and decide which ones to indict. Some people believe that the system is fine the way it is, others believe that it needs to change. Thomas P. Sullivan and Robert D. Nachman argue that the system works as a screening process, Andrew D. Leipold argues otherwise. Both sides state some common facts, while most of the argument is different from one another. Both Sullivan and Nachman’s argument and Leipold’s argument state that the grand jury is used to screen possible indictments.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, the jury is not a democracy. The jury reaches a verdict based only on evidence provided to them during the trial. Additionally, the trial aggravated a vast misunderstanding of the defense counsel’s role, a problem present before the case.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sixth Amendment Rights

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The right to counsel is something that a defendant should be allowed as our Sixth Amendment right states. Having this right, give the defendant their own choice as to who can represent them, when they are paying for it on their own accord. The Sixth Amendment rights state, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. ”(Book).…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A reason that supports the idea of scrapping the jury system is the lack of…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Such wage disparities may compromise the advocate’s enthusiasm, resulting in a less vigorous defence and sabotage of the accused individual rights in the criminal trial process. Additionally, to be applicable for Legal…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ”(Saks, 1997) The Supreme Court has ruled that peremptory challenges may not be based solely on a juror’s race or…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury plays a vital role in a criminal case in that the life of the offendder ulitimately hangs in the balance of those twelve unique individuals hands. It is their duty to remain impartial, independent, uninfluenced by any other person, and only decide the facts of the case. However, we are humans, and each of us perceive the world in different ways, which are influenced by our past and present experiences. Therefore, our judgements are clouded if we are unable to move away from those perceptions when it comes to deciding an individuals guilt or innocence. In the film 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, we can witness in firsthand how jury members could pose a bias due to their unique individual personality and personal experiences, when deciding the guilt or innocence of another human being.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Jury System

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Systems in Three Different Countries The world is a large place and it has many countries. For each country to survive, there must be laws and sometimes the law calls for a trial by a jury system. However, not all countries use the jury system but a few do and this paper will show how the jury system works in the United States, Greece, and Japan.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    English Jury System Essay

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    History: The jury system within the English legal system has evolved over a number of years, rather than being created from scratch. It has relatively changed since its first introduction on the days after the Norman Conquest. At first, the function of the jury was to partake the role of witnesses and provide general material considering local matters and determining which persons owned a certain piece of land and at where the boundary of the land was met. It was not until under the power of Henry II, that the jury took a considerably more important role within the judicial system.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    LEGAL STUDIES Civil law is one the main branches of law that help regulate society, Civil Law is classified as private law. The branch deals with non-criminal matters and allows an individual of society to bring fourth civil wrong doings that have been done to them that were caused by other members of the public. Civil law deals with minor issues such disputes between friends, business partners, consumer and retailer and a government department. Criminal law is another branch of law, Criminal law is part of the public law meaning it protects society from wrong doers. The laws made by parliament are outlines about the way people should act and what an individual should and shouldn’t do.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics