Juror 3 In 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
The movie Twelve Angry Men is mainly about members of the jury and their varied reactions towards a murder trial of a young man accused of stabbing his father to death. The movie shows how their decisions are based mainly on their own characteristics and personal life experiences. The testimony of witnesses, evidences provided were taken for granted and without even analyzing the case, were ready to give their verdict as guilty, to get it done and over with so they could go about their own business. Because of one Juror and his dissemination of evidences and witness testimony, the others started to see things in a different perspective.
Juror 3 is an angry father who is shown as a rude and arrogant man. He runs a messenger service, the Beck
…show more content…
He is soft spoken and looks as if he has given up on life, which shows in the way he walks and holds himself, but is observant, wise and has a fair-minded attitude and wants that justice be done. A fairly quiet person, he managed to change the minds of other jurors to vote as “ not guilty”, based on his strong arguments and by raising a number of reasonable doubts. He is the first one to support juror 8 as he feels that although at that point he thinks the boy is guilty, he did not want juror 8 to stand on his own against the others. He mentioned that he felt as if he knew the old man, who was one of the witnesses, further explaining that the old man was probably saying more than he knew because he was seeking attention so everyone would take notice of him. Juror 9 felt a connection here with the old witness, as he himself knew how it felt to be old and alone. Juror no. 9 also noted that the old lady witness, needed to wear glasses, a point he realized when he saw juror 4 rubbing the marks on his nose, made from wearing glasses, which were the similar marks on the lady witnesses’ nose. Which meant that if the lady witness was sleeping, she would not be wearing glasses and everything must have been a blur. This showed juror 9 was very observant of his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This juror is well-spoken and his way of thinking more on logical. He believed the accused as guilty because he had preconceived motions about people from the slums. He avoids the emotional arguments and engages in rational discussion. He changes his vote due to the witness's testimony is discredited. As a young man, Jack Klugman is afraid of expressing his opinion to the members of the group.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The defendant can’t remember all of the details of his alibi the night of the incident, several witnesses testified that they heard screaming, and another said she had seen the boy stabbed his father with her own two eyes, and flee the scene of the crime. Looking at the men responsible for deciding the fate of this young man, you can immediately identify profound personality traits of each juror, by the way that they vote. Originally tension was established within the group due to people thinking that others were operating within their individual role, expressing doubts and opinions between each other to satisfy their individual interest in the decision making process. The individual role is defined as “Roles that focus more on individuals own interests and needs, than on those of the group (Dunn and Goodnight). As the story unfolds you begin to see the jurors enter their group role.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Thesis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What if you were on trial for first degree murder? In the movie 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a young eighteen year old male was on trial for supposedly murdering his own father. The twelve men on the jury were faced with different opinions and facts that questioned their morals and values in life. I feel as if this movie did have “worth” in my life. I think the movie had worth because no one should ever be stereotyped, judged, and accused based on what other people say.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jury was attacking him because they believed that it was impossible for the knife (murder weapon used to kill the boys’ father) to fall out of the boys’ pocket; and the same knife shows up and is used to kill his father. Juror eight proved that the boy could be telling the truth. For instance, the jurors told juror eight that the knife was very unusual and that they have never seen one like it. Juror eight then uses proof to back his argument by pulling out the same knife; he then says, “I went walking for a couple of hours last night. I walked through the boys’ neighborhood.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror number three is a very stubborn and opinionated man. In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, twelve men must decide the fate of a young boy who is said to have killed his father. Juror number three really does not like to be wrong, especially when it contradicts something that he has believed in for a long time. He yells at all the people that do not agree with him, no matter what the subject is. He also believes that there are facts, that can not be proven false, that point to the kid being guilty.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The movie “12 Angry Men” opens to the jury room and fills with twelve juries’ arguments and complain over the murder case. The case was about whether an eighteen year old boy should be found guilty or not guilty about his action. He was accused of killing his father by stabbing him with a knife. The boy’s life is depended on the twelve juries, and those juries are gathered in all different work fields with a little knowledge in criminal justice. The juries began its deliberations; they started to vote and all the jury vote “guilty” except for one, voted “not guilty”.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The William Friedkin directed drama features a hot debate among 12 jurors whose main objective is to either convict or free a young man- the kid, who has been accused of murder charges. The judge clearly instructs the jury that whatever decision they should make could greatly affect the defendant’s life. Among the 12 judges, 11 of them vote guilty for the defendant but juror number 8 (Fonda) disagrees with them citing reasonable doubt and considering the defendant’s ghetto lifestyle. Fonda attempts to convince the fellow jurors of his point of view claiming the boy has a right to a fair hearing (12 Angry Men). Unlike in most movies where the judge is on the spotlight, the jury is the main concentration of the movie.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The delay of the trial was due to the court going back and forth on which recorded therapy sessions could be used as evidence. Then in August 1992, several tapes were declared admissible, but not the tape of Erik discussing the murders. So in 1993, the brothers were finally going to be judged, as well as enlighten the public what really happened that Sunday night. The courtroom was silent when Erik’s defense lawyer, Leslie Abramson, read her clients’ defense. It was stated that the boys murdered their parents out of self-defense, fearing for their lives after years of abuse.…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Guilty.” (Rose 26) Juror #8 was able to persuade another juror into believing that the boy was innocent of any crime. Juror #8 persuaded the other jurors by arguing the facts and making the other jurors see them in a new light. Juror #8 did not lie or bully the other juror to believe in his side of the story instead he argued the alternate facts of the case because Juror #8 is looking at the case from as unbiased a view as he can attempt. Juror #8 is trying to offer the boy compassion and fairness instead of mistrust and hatred like some of the other jurors. In The Crucible, Abigail demanded the other girls listen to her and she told them this, “Let either of you breather a work, or the edge of a word, about the other thing, and I will come to you in the black of some terrible night and I will bring a pointy reckoning that will shudder you.”…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jury must decide the fate of a young Hispanic man accused of violently stabbing and killing his father. The majority of the jury do not seem to grip the graveness of a guilty verdict and quickly cast their votes—which would ultimately cause the eighteen-year-old to be executed by the state.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays