12 Angry Men Character Analysis

Improved Essays
Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display.
Leadership
There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty. The second was a designated leader because the man was already appointed to be the spokesman. Juror number
…show more content…
Defensive communication was displayed when juror number eight was starting to convince other to change their verdict and when juror number three almost got into a physical fight while he contradicted himself and was the last to change his verdict. Juror number three would always use such a forceful tone and a lot of aggressive gestures like always pointing at others which created a really intense environment for the rest of the crew. Supportive communication was shown by juror number eight through the whole film when he was defending the kid and his case he always remained calm and supportive. Juror number eight would use small gestures like subtle touches in order to demonstrate that he support a certain person or to help prevent others from breaking into a physical fight which followed up by a calm tone which eventually would help decrease the tension in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The jury was attacking him because they believed that it was impossible for the knife (murder weapon used to kill the boys’ father) to fall out of the boys’ pocket; and the same knife shows up and is used to kill his father. Juror eight proved that the boy could be telling the truth. For instance, the jurors told juror eight that the knife was very unusual and that they have never seen one like it. Juror eight then uses proof to back his argument by pulling out the same knife; he then says, “I went walking for a couple of hours last night. I walked through the boys’ neighborhood.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Thesis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What if you were on trial for first degree murder? In the movie 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a young eighteen year old male was on trial for supposedly murdering his own father. The twelve men on the jury were faced with different opinions and facts that questioned their morals and values in life. I feel as if this movie did have “worth” in my life. I think the movie had worth because no one should ever be stereotyped, judged, and accused based on what other people say.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jury must decide the fate of a young Hispanic man accused of violently stabbing and killing his father. The majority of the jury do not seem to grip the graveness of a guilty verdict and quickly cast their votes—which would ultimately cause the eighteen-year-old to be executed by the state.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Man Analysis

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Twelve Angry Man · “Life is in their hands,Death is on their minds。”These worlds from Twelve Angry Man. This text talked about there have twelve members of the jury are discussed in a rest room to decide whether a murder case was established. The murder defendant is a 18 year old child, his father is dead. Twelve members of a jury must discuss a consensus: the children's murder of a crime. If established, the child will be sent to the chair the execution of the death penalty.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Men In 12 Angry Men

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When trying to capture everyone in the group, the questioning and tone is a crucial. (LOOK for QUOTE). The one gentleman, who votes not guilty, receives backlash from the rest of group. If the men would have set the rules in the beginning, it would have solved some of the issues of the group. The group experiences conflict resolution when they begin attacking each other’s character and it is quickly demised and refocused.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    12 Angry Men Movie Clip (Architect) From the beginning, the Architect was the only person who believed that there was reasonable doubt, which cause him to stand along. He stated and consistently repeated throughout several scenes that he didn’t know whether or not the boy’s story is true or not which led him to be t he only person to vote not guilty. After a series of several voting attempts, the Architect continued to challenge the jurors locked in thinking which stimulated other to think outside the box and new question emerged. Slowly, other juror members begin to change their mind and vote not guilty as well. His leadership style proved to be very consistent as he confronted others however when necessary and remained very direct, honest…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #2 finds it “interesting that he’d find a knife exactly like the one the boy bought”(24). Afterwards, the 8th Juror suggests that the elderly man, one of the witnesses, lied because of the point Juror #3 tried to make. Juror #3 says, that the elderly man “[ran] to his door and [saw] the kid tearing down the stairs fifteen seconds after the killing”(42). Juror #8 then suggests that the elderly man could not have done that because of his stroke. He then decides to recreate what the elderly man said he did on the night of the murder.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He has his opinion and is unwilling or unable to discuss with others. In our jury, The Angry One also exhibited these characteristics. The New juror came in the second to last day and had opinions but mostly kept quiet. The Quiet one did not do much talking except for voting. Every juror plays a distinct part in deciding the fate of the defendant, which showed during 12 Angry Men and during a personal jury when deciding whether or not OJ Simpson was…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not a permanent solution though, and people go back to thinking that he is innocent. As a result he only gets more angry with juror eight and makes him think that the kid is guilty. Overall, juror number three is an angry man who only believes what he’s told himself to make him feel better. He only appreciates the opinions that he has believed all his life. He yells at people a lot when someone disagrees with him.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Our judicial system is one that influences people of all walks of life and it has influenced people for generations, there is no escaping it. In 12 Angry Men, Juror #8 was able to convince the other jurors to believe that the boy was innocent, he convinced Juror #4, who then said, “I’m sorry. I’m convinced. I don’t think I’m wrong often but I guess I was this once. There is a reasonable doubt in my mind.” (Rose 62) Juror #8 was able to argue using the facts to persuade his fellow jurors to see the boy as innocent so that they did not send an innocent man to his death.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays