Judicial Assignment
1. Describe the two judicial philosophies?
First there is Judicial Activism, which is a doctrine holding that the federal judiciary should take an active role by using its powers to check the activities of governmental bodies when those bodies exceed their authority. (Bades, 2016) Then there is Judicial Restraint which is A doctrine holding that the courts should defer to the decisions made by the elected representatives of the people in the legislative and executive branches when possible. (Bades, 2016)
2. What are the differences in the two?
Judicial activism is when a ruling or decision is made based on the personal opinion or decision of the judge. Judicial Restraint is where no opinion will be used in making a
1. Describe the two judicial philosophies?
First there is Judicial Activism, which is a doctrine holding that the federal judiciary should take an active role by using its powers to check the activities of governmental bodies when those bodies exceed their authority. (Bades, 2016) Then there is Judicial Restraint which is A doctrine holding that the courts should defer to the decisions made by the elected representatives of the people in the legislative and executive branches when possible. (Bades, 2016)
2. What are the differences in the two?
Judicial activism is when a ruling or decision is made based on the personal opinion or decision of the judge. Judicial Restraint is where no opinion will be used in making a