• Home Page
  • Alexander Hamilton Judicial Branch Analysis

Alexander Hamilton Judicial Branch Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
Alexander Hamilton seen the courts as the weakest branch of government for a few reasons. The courts wasn’t undemocratic and followed the constitutions which protected the will of the people. He referred the judicial branch as the least dangerous branch. He was under the impression that they wouldn’t get political and would simply act with integrity. Another reason he considered the judicial branch weak was due to them having no control of money, military, and couldn’t enforce decisions. To quote the Federalist No. 78, “The judiciary will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution…. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL but merely judgment.” He believed the judiciary needs to be free from any

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Litwack Vs Michener
    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Litwack Vs Michener

    James Michener said, “Their decision to divide the power of the government into three parts - Legislative, Executive, Judicial - was a masterstroke.” He thinks that our government and constitution are equally powerful and effective. Thurgood Marshall, Supreme Court Justice, had a different view on the constitution. He recognizes…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Hamilton Vs. Jefferson
    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Hamilton Vs. Jefferson

    In 17 days, he finished the first draft of the declaration of independence. It was presented to Congress on June of 1776, and the final version was adopted on July 4. Jefferson served Virginia in the House of Representatives, then as governor. George Washington appointed him as the First Secretary of State. He didn't get quite along with Alexander Hamilton, the Secretary of Treasury.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    John Marshall's Speech At The Constitutional Convention Of 1787
    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Marshall's Speech At The Constitutional Convention Of 1787

    At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the delegates shared a commitment to an independent judiciary. People thought it would be good to have a co equal branch to serve alongside the legislative and executive branches.but delegates did not show up to philadelphia with a fully developed plan for the judicial branch. It has the ability to create courts, interpret the law,determining whether a specific law conforms to the Constitution,and applying the law to specific cases, typically ones that are disputed. john marshall became the fourth chief justice of the united states in 1801. A major influence in his life during the revolutionary war was george washington which was a close friend of marshalls.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 78: Written By Alexander Hamilton
    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Federalist No. 78: Written By Alexander Hamilton

    Federalist No. 78 written by Alexander Hamilton fully examined the judicial branch. In the Federalist Paper, it claimed that the Judicial neither wields the sword of the Executive Branch nor has the purse of the Legislative. The sword is the power of the Executive that controls the nation’s militia and grants the President to be the Commander-in-Chief. The power of the purse grants the Legislative Branch the ability to control the spending and tax policies of the nation. The Judicial Branch, in Hamilton’s words, “had neither FORCE nor WILL but merely judgment,” deeming it to be the least dangerous of the three branches.…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Articles Of Confederation's Judicial Power
    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Articles Of Confederation's Judicial Power

    Thus, the president and the vice president has the executive power. The judicial power is now held by a supreme court and inferior court. Furthermore, the Articles of Confederation created a loose unison among the sates, and a federal government with limited powers.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander Hamilton: The Most Influential Founding Fathers
    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton: The Most Influential Founding Fathers

    All too common today is the phrase “what would our founding fathers think,” usually used in reference to the technology-obsessed millennials or the ever-declining moral state of the nation. The fact of the matter is, what the founding fathers think has absolutely no influence or weight today, as they are all dead. If the founding fathers were presumably brought back, for some ungodly reason, they would probably be too transfixed with iPhones to do anything relevant or useful. The founding fathers’ opinions on today’s state of affairs is irrelevant, but they do have lasting influence, especially Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton was one of the most influential founding fathers, who created many hallmarks of America today, despite having lived over two hundred twenty years ago.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander Hamilton's Strong National Government
    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton's Strong National Government

    In the eleven years before the Constitution was created, the Founding Fathers learned that they needed a strong national government, where a handful of people held all the power and did what they thought was best for the people, justly ruling with total control. Before the Constitution, the national Congress “did not have the powers to levy and collect taxes, or regulate trade and commerce between the states” (Text, 54). This meant that the government had no source for the money it needed and no way of controlling the actions of the people. Alexander Hamilton believed that “the only way to fix the growing problems of the new nation was to implement a strong national government designed to protect property and civil liberties from the state…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Alexander Hamilton's Federalist No. 78
    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Alexander Hamilton's Federalist No. 78

    I am responding to Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist No. 78. In this essay, he discusses aspects of what would later make up the United States government’s judicial branch. One of the arguments he makes is that Congress asserts the right to shoot down legislation from Congress that conflicts with the Constitution. I think Hamilton is right in his position on whether the Supreme Court can exercise judicial review without it being in the Constitution. One of the reasons I agree with him is because of the analogies he gives that make logical sense to me, such as the servant being above the master being a parallel to the representatives of a people being above the people themselves.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander Hamilton: The Founding Father
    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton: The Founding Father

    Intelligence, bravery, and leadership; sounds like every other founding father, and that’s true. George Washington used these traits in war, Thomas Jefferson used these attributes in documents, Benjamin Franklin used these features through inventions, and John Adams used these traits for shaping America, but Alexander Hamilton used these characteristics for war, documents, inventions, and shaping America. He was captain of the company of artillery in war. He was also the main author of The Federalist Papers. He invented America’s first financial system.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    James Madison And The System Of Checks And Balances
    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    James Madison And The System Of Checks And Balances

    Under the system of Checks and Balances the power to rule is divided into the three branches of government. It includes the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches. James Madison states in the Federalist No. 51, “The distribution of power was intended so that each may be a check on the other.” In essence no branch can over power the other and together they make sure every branch is in upright.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Arbitrate Morality: Buck V. Bell
    • 1918 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Arbitrate Morality: Buck V. Bell

    “It is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue.” John Adams, who served as the second President of the United States and was a remarkable political philosopher, penned these words. Remarkably, John Adam’s words ring true today. However, morality is the issue and one point is sure: The United States Supreme Court should not arbitrate morality.…

    • 1918 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Term Limits In Supreme Court Cases
    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Term Limits In Supreme Court Cases

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Appointments Clause Of The Constitution Essay
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Appointments Clause Of The Constitution Essay

    The Constitution of the United States is best understood as the product of a balancing act between the Founders’ desire to avoid a tyranny and their recognition of the need to form a strong government that would ensure national stability and prosperity. The Appointments Clause of the Constitution fits within this framework nicely. Article II, Section 2, Clause II of the Constitution states that “the President…shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint… Judges of the supreme Court.” The clause establishes a clear division of power between the executive and legislative branches in nominating and confirming Supreme Court Justices.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On The Judicial Branch
    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Essay On The Judicial Branch

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Judicial Branch
    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Judicial Branch

    To maintain the strength of the Judicial Branch having a strong system to provide checks and balances of the other branches of government, there should be a certain level of independence for the Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch often has the last say in matters regarding judicial review, and because of this, they should be able to operate independently from the other two branches and serve as the final say in these matters. According to Padovano, Sgarra, & Fiorino, (2003), the judiciary is generally better positioned to check such unlawful behavior then voters, since he has access to much better information than they do. Voters that often want a bigger say in these rulings are not always the best options for keeping a strong checks and balances for the highest level of decision making that occurs in the judicial review process. A certain level of independence to the Judicial Branch can allow the certainty of a strong separation of powers and checks and balance system that cannot be controlled by the very parts of government it is trying…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings