A New York State law created states all public schools were to open each day with the Pledge of Allegiance and a nondenominational prayer in which the students acknowledged their dependence upon God. Engel vs. Vitale was a case brought to the attention of the Supreme Court by ten concerned parents by minors who attended a public school in New York City.
At the beginning of a school day lesson the following prayer, consisting of 22 words, ‘Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our country. Amen.’, was recited due to the approval of the New York state board of regents (state board of education) in 1951. It was meant to teach good character and citizenship in the students. The ruling did prohibit schools from writing or reciting a specific prayer and requiring all students to say it. The majority stated that allowing students to absent themselves from this activity did not make the law constitutional because the purpose of the First Amendment was to prevent government interference with religion. The issue before the court was on the establishment Claus of the first amendment of the federal law, which was also included in the fourteenth amendment of the New York state constitution and violation of separation between …show more content…
There are different opinions from both sides on matter concerning constitution and other issues. For instance, conservative opinion on the government control suggest that it should be minimal, while liberalism will have the opinion that government should control activities of people such as competition to ensure fair justice. In this case, both views are presented by both parties in their arguments and the decision by the court can be placed on the conservative
At the beginning of a school day lesson the following prayer, consisting of 22 words, ‘Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our country. Amen.’, was recited due to the approval of the New York state board of regents (state board of education) in 1951. It was meant to teach good character and citizenship in the students. The ruling did prohibit schools from writing or reciting a specific prayer and requiring all students to say it. The majority stated that allowing students to absent themselves from this activity did not make the law constitutional because the purpose of the First Amendment was to prevent government interference with religion. The issue before the court was on the establishment Claus of the first amendment of the federal law, which was also included in the fourteenth amendment of the New York state constitution and violation of separation between …show more content…
There are different opinions from both sides on matter concerning constitution and other issues. For instance, conservative opinion on the government control suggest that it should be minimal, while liberalism will have the opinion that government should control activities of people such as competition to ensure fair justice. In this case, both views are presented by both parties in their arguments and the decision by the court can be placed on the conservative