Judicial Tyranny Review

Improved Essays
Judicial Tyranny Review

Name: Institution

Introduction
This books gives insights on the situation of judicial system of America. It enlightens on how the court system has become corrupt gradually since it was granted its mandate. The court has been used for personal matters and too much affiliated to politics. Robertson notes that, morals and libertinism has been corrupted by over use of power. Judicial system has surpassed its constitutional roles and rights and it has taken over other arms of the government. It is evident that, practice of the law has fringed the rights of American citizens. It has even enshrined its rules and powers into the church commanding its authority which is against Christianity belief and practices.
…show more content…
Federal and supreme courts have gradually acquired powers and radicalised the system of justice to suit their selfish gains. It is no longer liberal and people centered, but a threat to liberty of Americans, (Merril, T, 1985). It has grown powerful and has the audacity to perform its activities no matter how much unconstitutional they are. Its powers has become unrestricted because not even any arm of the government can hinder their functions. Right from its enactment, the judicial system became perverted to justice. It continuously grew out of control and started to radicalise other courts. The outcome has brought adverse effects to the government of America, ( Boudin, L, 1990).The form of government has been altered since judiciary has expanded its authority to other arm of the government. It has affiliations to the legislature and executive bodies of the government, it is not a solitary body as it was …show more content…
It has grown powerful at the same time uncontrollable. This unrestricted power has resulted to consequences that have been felt to date. The court system has become more hostile to religions especially Christianity. It has propelled the enactment of laws that very contrary to the beliefs and practices of Christianity. Robertson observes that, legalisation of gays is just too much for Christian religion. The church does not allow gay marriage and it is even an abomination to other religions. Despites this prior knowledge, the court system has prevailed in making sure gay is legal despite outcry from religious groups. It has played a role is supressing some church activities and beliefs hence it undermines freedom of religion. According to the constitution, the court has its limits in affairs concerning faith and religion. However, the judiciary has assumed some roles that contrary to the constitution. It has entrenched the church with policies and laws that are against the faith. Mark you, these laws have resulted into a corrupt society. The court has catapulted erosion of morals in the society due to the rules it passes, (Robertson, P, 2004). Society is more corrupt and immoral than it was before. Legalisation of same sex marriages has resulted to an era which does not regard marriage sacred as it was meant to be. Other laws that have been enacted include legalisation of abortion. This law is a contradiction to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Court does not possess the appropriate tools to implement their decisions. Courts cannot actively seek out appellants, appellants have to seek courts in order for their claims to be heard. The courts are described as the least dangerous branch of the government because the judiciary lacks the “influence over either the sword or the purse” (Rosenberg, 15). If the courts lack the political and elite support, the court’s decision will not be effective in its implementation; therefore, the decision will hold no power. Rosenberg argues that even if courts are characterized as producers of social change, it is a mere illusion.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial powers are stated in the Constitution and we labeled the Supreme Court, and those courts that are below the highest in the land, congress has the obligation to establish these courts. Distribution of power allows the Supreme Court to have the final say-so in cases involving: ambassadors, other public ministers and counsels. During any other cases the Supreme Court should have the power of court review and the ability to change the outcomes of the lower courts final deacons. Thus the question that will arise is that, if an act is untasteful in the Constitutions terms can the law become the law of the country, this should be an interesting topic for elected officials.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While the ideal example of a democracy places the decisions of government in citizen’s hands, the United States rarely does as such. For example, the Supreme Court, while influenced by public approval and public opinion, isolates itself from the media and public in two specific ways. Its Justices, appointed by the president, are indirect methods for people to get what they want from the highest branch of the Judiciary Branch. Similar to the method and processes used to elect a president through the Electoral College, the Supreme Court works in a way that places the power of the government in educated individuals’ hands as opposed to the direct power of votes in an election for a state governor. It indirectly allows people to influence Court…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The founding fathers of the United States feared the development of an oppressive government. To counter this, the founding fathers developed a system of checks and balances that directly includes the people. The right to a jury trial has a central role in the American justice system that prevents unlawful acts from being continued. Thus, juries have a political significance outside the judicial branch. The jury system acts as a check on government power preventing government officials from making laws that are morally wrong.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Tyranny Name: Michael Workman Book Review – CJUS 330 Liberty University May 04, 2015 Judicial Tyranny Judicial tyranny occurs when a judge declares the federal or constitutional laws null and void in the process of his court case decision. Currently the greatest threat to the thriving American democratic space is the supreme powers of the judges over matters with regard to politics, socialism and economic issues. The judicial tyranny is made manifest in the judicial system infiltration by the executive branch of the government through the influence of the president, congressmen and their voters who relinquish powers without knowledge of its impending dangers. The role of the constitution in checking the balances between…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America stands for justice, nevertheless, equality but the Judicial Branch possess an amount power over Congress that overshadows this statement. The Judicial Branch consists of three levels; the District Courts, Court of Appeals and uppermost power, the Supreme Court. Despite the fact that the Senate and Executive branch have the choice of who maintains the position of Supreme Court Justices, the Supreme Court still has the ability to subdue the other branches. Revealed in the United States Constitution, Chief Justice John Marshall’s majority decision, in addition to a 2005 Political cartoon, it is evident that the Supreme Court subjugates the Executive and Legislative Branch.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Executive, points out Hamilton, wields, “the sword of the community,” as well as, “dispenses the honors,” thereof. Further, argues Hamilton, the Legislature, “commands the purse,” as well as, “prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated.” Contrary to these aforementioned powers, the Judiciary, states Hamilton, “has no influence over either the sword or the purse,” rather judicial power is passive and defensive. Hamilton goes on to argue that the judiciary, in its limited scope, has, “neither force nor will but merely judgement.” The passive nature of the Judiciary’s power means that it cannot “attack,” either of the two other branches, and that, “all possible care,” must be taken in order to ensure the Judiciary is able to defend itself against impositions by the other two…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The judicial branch, from its creation in the United States has been that of a large debate. The problem with judicial branch that many argue is that the people of this country do not elect the Supreme Court of the United States. However, the President who the country votes into office appoints them to the Court. Judicial review has a long historical background, dating back to Hamilton’s argument in The Federalist Papers, all of which impacts how the Court uses judicial review today regarding civil liberties. In addition, judicial review has been applied in landmark Supreme Court cases such as Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, and Griswold v. Connecticut.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The system of checks and balances of power in our political system is essential and judicial review is but one assurance that no single person or group can make a determination to override the Constitution. Members of the Supreme Court must police themselves from within through educated and powerful discussions. It is unlikely that a majority of the group would ever become despots, unchecked by the larger group. In all, there must be checks and balances in our system and the power of judicial review stands as a very critical aspect of this process, while maintaining the equitable balance of power between our branches of…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judicial Independence

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages

    To be responsible means to be answerable for something within one's power or control. The single most important aspect of our current system is the concept of judicial independence. Judicial independence is critical to the functioning of any democracy – as evidenced by its incorporation into the structure of our nation’s government established by the federal constitution. The concept of judicial independence is one of the key factors that distinguish our system of government from others around the world. It protects the weak from the powerful; the minority from the majority; the poor from the rich; yes, even the citizens from excesses of government.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In American politics is conducted within the framework of a written constitution which establishes the powers of the different branches of government, as well as many of the fundamental rights and liberties of American citizens. However, since the Constitution is such a brief document that sets out general principles and in most areas is not very specific in what it means. Therefore, its precise meaning in any particular situation is often unclear. As a result, many of the decisions reached about what the Constitution actually means have been reached by judges whose role it is to establish and interpret constitutional law. It is evident that constitutional law requires constitutional interpretation, this has now become the use of the US Supreme Court.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of Powers Separation of powers is a basic doctrine in modern democratic government. It originated from the writings of a French philosopher named Montesqieu who in 1748 published a book entitled “The Spirit of the Laws”. He introduced the idea that power of government were three of kinds: the legislative, the executive and the judicial power.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays