Judge Gorsuch Research Paper

Decent Essays
Judge Neil Gorsuch is the nominee that president Trump has nominated to serve as a supreme court justice. Judge Gorsuch was nominated to take the place of Justice Antonin Scale who unfortunately died while serving in office. This is somewhat of a rare occasion because it is not often a justice died while serving. It is even more extraordinary that it happened the same year the presidential election was scheduled to happen. When this rare occasion occurs, per article 2 of the constitution, this gives the president the power to nominate a justice the supreme court. This nomination is subject to advice and consent from the senate. We saw earlier last year that the senate rejected the nomination from president Obama. We will have to wait and see what the senate decided regarding the nomination for Judge Gorsuch. …show more content…
Democrats are opposed to this idea because of the fact the supreme court will be more in favor of Conservative views. This can have impact on things such as welfare, taxes, and other hot topics that the two parties tend to disagree on. All the Supreme court justices and nominees are well qualified to run this highly prestigious possession but the issue becomes regarding the party they are associated with. In my opinion if Judge Gorsuch is selected to be a supreme court justice we will only see changes in cases regarding issues that democrats and republics disagree but at the end of the day regarding other cases justice will be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rick Scott Research Paper

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Florida Governership Elections Rick Scott Rick Scott, born in Bloomington, Virginia, is a graduate of the university of Missouri and a Republican businessman and Politician. After graduating, Scott joined the United States Navy, where he gained leadership experience. When he left the army, he joined the Dallas firm, Johnson & Swanson as a partner. Along with two other partners He co-founded the for-profit company, Columbia Hospital Corporation. After the Hospital ran into some charges on felony, Rick Scott resigned his position as a cheif exceutive.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The political landscape as we know it today has always allowed The President of the United States to select his own Supreme Court judge. However, should the Supreme Court Judge’s beliefs represent the traits or value systems of the President of United States? For example, President George Bush appointed both Clarence Thomas and David Souter, two contrasting personalities say the least. Nonetheless, Clarence Thomas was known for his boldness, committed to seeking out the original meaning of the Constitution, perhaps, similarities to President Bush prosecuted the Gulf War and how he stood behind Thomas controversial confirmation hearings (McGinnis, Flaherty, 1995).…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jeff Sessions as Attorney General Jeff Sessions is the United States Attorney General or head of the Department of Justice and was President Trump’s first pick for this position. Born Jefferson Beauregard "Jeff" Sessions III, the 69-year-old was Alabama's attorney general before he joined the Senate in 1996. Many oppose him as the Attorney General because of rumors of racism but these are just rumors and have no factual backing. This piece is made to support the President’s decision and provide several reasons why Jeff Sessions is qualified to be the United States Attorney General (Jeff Sessions). Jeff Sessions is experienced in judiciary work.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress has to approve the justices before they can claim their rightful spot on the bench. To put things in context, politics from the 70’s and 80’s are coming back years later to impact the…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Review I believe having a Supreme Court is valuable for any democracy to maintain fairness between governmental power and the rights of citizens. However, with a court that wields such authority, the justices serving these courts must be appointed in a manner that represents a balance in political ideology. Moreover, if multiple appointments are made to the Supreme Court by a president and congress of one political persuasion, the court’s rulings can overwhelmingly favor a particular political party’s ideology. Balanced judicial appointments create balanced rulings in most cases. This neutrality can be disrupted by political influence as evidenced in recent rulings.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clarence Thomas Essay

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Clarence Thomas was appointed to the Supreme Court to replace Thurgood Marshall, however, regarding his stances, Thomas is practically the “anti-Thurgood”. Thomas approaches constitutional interpretation of the law through the “originalist” perspective, meaning this “philosophy calls for interpreting the Constitution by looking to the words in the document” (American progress). Thomas is one of the many Roman Catholics sitting on the Court and is also widely considered the most conservative. Clarence Thomas had been said to have specific policy preferences closer to that of an extreme conservative. Thomas is anti-gay marriage and he is against affirmative action.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, it is the Constitutional duty of President Obama to choose his successor. While the Republican party is insisting that a Justice is not chosen until after the next Presidential election, President Obama is determined to fill the position in the next few weeks despite the threats of his nomination being declined. At this time I believe that the best possible candidate to fill the position would be Srikanth Srinivasan. To begin, we should first take a look at what President Obama has stated he is searching for in the next Supreme Court Justice. As mentioned on the SCOTUS blog, the first thing that is important in a nominee is that they must possess a mastery of the law (A Responsibility I Take Seriously).…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Until the latter part of the twentieth century, most nominations almost involved exclusively the White House and the Senate. Public controversy over nominees rarely existed and the debate included a small number of insiders. The process of nominating Supreme Court justices manifested the cooperation of the three branches of American national government. The Constitution provides for presidential appointment power over “judges of the Supreme Court” with the “Advice and Consent” of the…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court is commonly thought to be “above politics,” since they are there to just interpret the law and not argue politic, inevitably though, politics still manages to seep in. In fact the appointment of justices is, in reality, extremely political due to all the factors needed to be appointed. In order to be a justice three main characteristics are needed: ideology, ethnicity, and political experience. Each one has a profound impact in the appointment process. Interests groups are extremely concerned with the whole process because it could help or hurt the interests groups and it constitutions for generations if a justice is appointed that has contradictory views.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The president may not unilaterally appoint justices; he may only nominate them, and abide by the Senate’s verdict on them, whether confirmation or rejection. As the constitutional scholar John McGinnis writes, “the very…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rather than there being any sort of dispute to the nomination, Senator Thurmond actually praised Breyer at the hearing, ultimately leading to his confirmation (Eizenstat, 2). As expected, President Carter did not hesitate to nominate and Breyer was confirmed by a vote of 80-10 by the…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Senate is forced to follow rules writers quote “insane” because, they are only understood by very few people and incomprehensible. Lastly, a vote will then emerge from the Senate, up or down vote, on whether he got the number a votes required or fell short. If the judge receives an up…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays