Clarence Thomas Essay

Improved Essays
Clarence Thomas was appointed to the Supreme Court to replace Thurgood Marshall, however, regarding his stances, Thomas is practically the “anti-Thurgood”. Thomas approaches constitutional interpretation of the law through the “originalist” perspective, meaning this “philosophy calls for interpreting the Constitution by looking to the words in the document” (American progress). Thomas is one of the many Roman Catholics sitting on the Court and is also widely considered the most conservative. Clarence Thomas had been said to have specific policy preferences closer to that of an extreme conservative. Thomas is anti-gay marriage and he is against affirmative action. His stances on these policies are mostly obvious given his political and religious ideologies, however, one could say that his rejection to affirmative action is odd. Many would assume that because Clarence Thomas is an African American then he should be for Affirmative Action, but in fact he sees this program as demeaning to African Americans. He believes Affirmative Action basically implies that minorities are “somehow inferior to their white classmates” (Clarence Thomas on Civil Rights); and that it teaches that they would not be able to achieve success without a crutch and therefore held to a different standard by their peers. It is widely accepted that a Justices policy preferences are exposed through their decisions on cases or dissents thereof. Last July, in 2015, it was stated that Justice Thomas wrote a total of 36 opinions in that particular term. Half (18) of them were in the form of dissents, written both with others and alone; this total amount however, did not include his separate opinions (The Atlantic). Thomas often sided or dissented alongside other conservative Justices sitting on the Supreme Court, such as: Justices Scalia, Alito, Rehnquist, and Roberts. Clarence Thomas’s policy preferences are largely constricted regarding civil rights; in fact, he has left a major impact on this area of law. …show more content…
His stances on the issues regarding these protections prove that “he may be more opposed than any other justice to the governments consideration of race in programs that help African Americans” (American Progress). Actually, after Clarence Thomas’s spoke about the past Brown vs Board of Education case, a case challenged by Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP against segregation among schools, it was stated that “it is now clear that the second black justice is doing everything in his power to undo nearly everything that the first black justice accomplished—as a lawyer and a judge—to ensure a more equal society” (American Progress). Unforeseeably, the decision marked in the original case of Brown vs Board of Education was practically overturned in 2007 as one of the many cases of which Thomas …show more content…
It is stated that Thomas is “clearly on good terms with his colleagues, and is a beloved figure within the small world of Court personnel” (The Atlantic). However, he will continuously be known for his extremely conservative ideals, his unique path toward entering the Court, and his distinctive approach to the law. His legacy so far has been of surprises and his memoirs are detailed in his book titled My Grandfather’s Son. There has been question on whether Thomas is “evolving”, reducing his extreme conservative outlook; however, the morals of a conservative will likely remain intact. It has been said that “Thomas will probably leave the Court with the most conservative record in its history” (The

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    But he came back stronger than ever for Day 2. Thurgood has such a strong statement that shocked the entire courtroom, “Black and white are entitled to the same, but if they attend the same elementary and high school, the world will fall apart. In 1896 the Supreme Court basically said it is all right for states to discriminate and that Plessy was a fraud”. Earl Warren wholeheartedly agreed with Thurgood. This is significant because while Fred Vinson was still Chief Justice, many were uncertain about the manner at hand.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomas took a very stern stance on the executive branch having broad authority over the constitution and its federal statuses, this is easily expressed in the Case of Hamdi V. Rumsfeld where he was the only justice to agree that the federal government had the legal right to detain hi stating that since he was an illegal Enemy Combatant that he was not protected under the Geneva convention. Thomas avidly voted for decision that would grant state-governmental authority in cases that involved specifically federalism based limits on the congress authority. Interestingly enough as justice he was on average the most willing to exercise judicial review of federal statues in comparison with state statues he was the least likely to vote against them. Due to past that was filled was constant adversity his view on the bill of rights was very hard pressed on equal rights and the continuing social movent for them to be both recognized and protect this is shown through multiple examples within several of the amendments found in the bill of…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sonia Sotomayor Essay

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sonia Sotomayor Sonia Sotomayor, current associate Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court Justice, is the first person of Hispanic descent and the third female to be appointed as a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Sotomayor was born in the Bronx on June 25, 1954 to parents Juan Sotomayor and Celina Baez, whom are both of Puerto Rican descent. Her father was a blue-collar worker and her mother was a nurse, who also served in the Women’s Army Corps during World War II. Due to early success in High School, Sotomayor was able to secure a scholarship-funded admission into the Ivy League university, Princeton. During her time at Princeton, Sotomayor served as the co-chairman of the Puerto Rican activist group Accion Puertorriquena, and it was also during this time that she accused the…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Essay

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the nonfiction book by Jeffrey Toobin, he talks about the justice system and the Supreme Court in the United States and how it functions and also how it has changed over the years in history. The book shows a great look at how individuals such as George W. Bush in how they hold their power and how the justice system affects that. Also giving a great understanding with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's alienation. It also touches on the topic of a “fight” of conservatives that were taking control or trying to take control of the supreme court. Despite that there were many more republican appointees on the court it fails in the 80s and 90s.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The great privilege of United States of America is the people of the country have the right to equality. Clayborne Carson an author of the argumentative essay “Two Cheers for Brown vs. Board of Education”. Born in Buffalo, New York; he is an educated scholar who specializes in African American and civil rights history. Carson’s essay is summarizes how Brown affected the outcome of desegregation in public schools. Brown is a Supreme Court decision that ruled public schools to allow African American children to attend predominantly Caucasian schools.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Scopes Trial occurred in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925. Although, despite the common idea that the trial was a true incident of unlawfulness, there lies within a controversy that resonates the idea that this trial contained no true legal value, it simply allowed for more tourist dollars and publicity in the small town of Dayton (Singham 23). In all actuality it is exceedingly unclear whether John Thomas Scopes truly taught evolution during his substitute teaching career (26-27). In support of this controversy, proof exists that instead of continuing to jail after his arrest, Scopes spent his time playing tennis and swimming (26). During his time about the town, Scopes was spotted associating civilly with a member of the prosecution team that…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There can be no assumption that today's majority is “right” and the Amish or others like them are “wrong.” A way of life that is odd or even erratic but interferes with no right or interests of others is not to be condemned because it is different. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Like Marshall, [Warren Burger] was an innovative, conservative chief justice with a profound sense of history and respect for the Constitution, fully conscious of the fundamental importance of an independent judiciary. Justice John Paul Stevens Warren Burger always was a person of strong beliefs and abundant energy. These attributes took him a long way, but they also created some opposition, as leadership does.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cordell Adams Holt Legal systems 8 October 2017 Plessy v.s Ferguson and Brown v.s Board of education Huge changes to equal rights in America all started in 1892 from two cases, first Homère Patrice Adolphe Plessy v.s judge John H. Ferguson followed by Oliver Brown v.s Board of Education. The Plessy v.s Ferguson case first created the idea of separate but equal in 1896, but in 1954 that changed, in a good way due to the popular case known as Brown v.s Board of education. These cases Plessy v.s Ferguson and Brown v.s Board of education both severely impacted segregation in America, the reason why we are not splitting up bus seats and schools based on race. First, 1892 the change started with a court decision “separate but equal from…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Board of Education was undoubtedly one of the greatest Supreme Court decisions in American history; it ruled that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. It has since allowed for all people to attend public schools in the United States (Britannica School). A study in 2004 showed remarkable progress -- schools in the South were more integrated than in the rest of the United States (Majerol). While Brown had a large impact on Civil Rights issues, the case also impacted the view and role of the Supreme Court. The ruling showed that the Supreme Court could use its constitutional power appropriately and that it was able to adapt to modern issues (Documents Related to Brown v. Board of Education).…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karlee Sunday Mrs. Holt Due-10/8/17 Law Essay Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education, two of the most landmarking cases that have changed the ways of the U.S. The case of Plessy v. Ferguson started with a man who opposed to discrimination of race, Brown v. Board of Education repealing the Pv. F case and making the final change on discrimination, both cases have similarities changing the way of human history, and the Supreme Court plays a big role in making the final decision. History is made by the people that want to make a change in the world.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1896, a supreme court case known as Plessy v. Ferguson ruled that the separation of whites and blacks into “separate but equal” public facilities, was fair and legal. Once formed, these separated schools were anything but equal, from both a quality of education, and a future opportunity aspect. However, in 1954 the Supreme Court overruled the previous decision made in 1896, in a case known as Brown v. Board of Education (Topeka, Kansas.) The case involved a man named Oliver Brown, who was the father of a student who had been refused entry into one of Topeka, Kansas’ white schools. The Supreme Court unanimously decided that separating children into different schools according to race, violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Board of Education is another very important case that shows that the ignorance in adults are affecting the next generation, the children. This court case is about segregation at schools between the whites and the negros being unconstitutional. Oliver L. Brown was African American with a daughter in the third grade had to walk six blocks to her bus stop to go to the segregated black school when she could just walk seven blocks and go to the closer school. Meanwhile, only problem is that school is a white school. Some of the parents tried to enroll their children to the closest schools but they were all refused and sent to the segregated school.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was Thurgood Marshall that stated that the court could rule in opposition to Linda Brown in NAACP and that they had all legal right too although what they would have opposed to wouldn’t have been…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 29th 2011, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg visited the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law. During an interview with Dean John B. Attanasio, she discussed her confirmation process and commented on the different milieu's that candidates have faced when nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court. Ginsburg explained that “[Between] 1993 and 1994, the climate was so different from the way it is today... The vote on me was 93 to 3. Today my ACLU connection would most likely disqualify me.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays