Investigating Writers: Assignment
This interpretation of writing varies from author to wordsmith, and with great appreciation I have gathered various insights to various writing processes and approaches displayed by the following correspondence which has not been without it’s detractors certainly.
While there are different strategies for developing an idea, Stephen King allows us to delve in and explore his own beliefs and theories of the foundations of writing. By recognizing another great writer, John Ervin, he began his lecture by declining certain processes, such as writing the final sentence of a book prior to all of the missing components. We can both agree to how Erven’s process would essentially not be enjoyable, since the process …show more content…
In his eyes, by reading a book repeatedly not only do you gain knowledge of a storyline/style and it’s characters, but you learn it’s architecture simultaneously. Although he believes each piece has it’s own essence, he would also like to make note that each of his writings came about by their own personalized reason like: a voice, a moving image or an anecdote. The most considerable lesson Lamb taught me is the importance of becoming who you are writing about, mentioning that for approximately eight-hours of the day he shifts into these characters in order to sincerely present their true-colours. I acknowledge giving depth to a character allows a reader to become connected and hooked to the content.
Conversely, neuroscientists suggest that by nature we are wired to be optimists, so it is not unlikely it has been suggested to “not worry” or “don’t panic” in fearful and stressful occurrences. While I believe this to be true, there is only so much that we can repress these fears as I believe it plays a vital component in our motive and attitude in life. Though I cannot entirely support Walker’s beliefs, I do believe that if we adjust the perspective of how we interpret our own narratives, we will be reasonable and leveled to a greater
This interpretation of writing varies from author to wordsmith, and with great appreciation I have gathered various insights to various writing processes and approaches displayed by the following correspondence which has not been without it’s detractors certainly.
While there are different strategies for developing an idea, Stephen King allows us to delve in and explore his own beliefs and theories of the foundations of writing. By recognizing another great writer, John Ervin, he began his lecture by declining certain processes, such as writing the final sentence of a book prior to all of the missing components. We can both agree to how Erven’s process would essentially not be enjoyable, since the process …show more content…
In his eyes, by reading a book repeatedly not only do you gain knowledge of a storyline/style and it’s characters, but you learn it’s architecture simultaneously. Although he believes each piece has it’s own essence, he would also like to make note that each of his writings came about by their own personalized reason like: a voice, a moving image or an anecdote. The most considerable lesson Lamb taught me is the importance of becoming who you are writing about, mentioning that for approximately eight-hours of the day he shifts into these characters in order to sincerely present their true-colours. I acknowledge giving depth to a character allows a reader to become connected and hooked to the content.
Conversely, neuroscientists suggest that by nature we are wired to be optimists, so it is not unlikely it has been suggested to “not worry” or “don’t panic” in fearful and stressful occurrences. While I believe this to be true, there is only so much that we can repress these fears as I believe it plays a vital component in our motive and attitude in life. Though I cannot entirely support Walker’s beliefs, I do believe that if we adjust the perspective of how we interpret our own narratives, we will be reasonable and leveled to a greater