Japan's Decision To End Ww2

Improved Essays
On August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, just three days later a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. While many historians argue about the morality of the bombs, and effect on the Japanese decision to surrender, this essay will discuss whether the Japanese had enough time to initiate a surrender in between the atomic bombings.
In Japan, there are six major leaders which are required to come to a unanimous decision to bring about surrender. At the time of the bombing of Hiroshima, the major leaders were split on deciding to surrendering, political leaders believing that Japan could not possibly continue to fight the war, military leaders were adamant that they push for a homeland battle, as the American forces would dread the casualties to arise from the battle. During a cabinet meeting on August 7th, 1945, military authorities denied that an atomic bomb had been used, believing the destruction to be caused by a routine air raid.
Japanese scientists had also been trying, and ultimately failed, to build an atomic bomb through the course of the war. “The Japanese military actually conducted three entirely separate atomic programs in the course of the Pacific
…show more content…
No matter what happens to my safety, we should lose no time in ending the war so as not to have another tragedy like this” (Hirohito quoted in Asada 487). In a private meeting with Hirohito on August 8th, 1945, Foreign Minister Togo Shigenori articulated his concerns about continuing to fight. Togo found Hirohito to be in agreeance with his opinion and was urged to express the Emperor’s wish to Prime Minister Suzuki Kantaro. Togo and Suzuki decided to convene a meeting of the Supreme War Council. Some of the military leaders were unavailable, delaying the meeting until the next

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Prompt & Utter Destruction is a book by J. Samuel Walker that details the events leading up the decision for the United States to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Narrative-like descriptions of cabinet meetings, personal diary entries of important players, and first-hand accounts from soldiers in the war are all artfully pieced together to recreate the story of Truman’s decision, overturning many common misconceptions about the era and presenting new information. While Walker presents his own conclusions using the data he has compiled, he is careful to leave room for the reader to make his/her own inferences with the same data, and admits there are plenty of gaps in his information that could potentially…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the aftermath of the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor the United States retaliated on August 6, 1945, at 8:15 a.m. the crew of the Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb over the city of Hiroshima. The bomb detonated 2,000 feet above the center of Hiroshima, destroying 60% of the city and killing an estimated 70,000 to 100,000 people immediately. Due to amount of civilian deaths this led to, we often ask ourselves if the bombings over these Japanese cities were necessary. To debate wether the bombing was necessary we should pay attention to Japans decision to continue to not surrender after the first bombing. If a country is that proud and resilient for them to still refuse to surrender after one nuclear bombing killing between 70,000 to 100,000…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima (Aug. 6) and Nagasaki (Aug. 9) totaled to almost 200,000 Japanese casualties (Document A). President Harry Truman decided to use this horrific weapon considered to be immoral despite other options to force Japan to surrender, ending the second world war. On June 6th, 1945, the Japanese War Council stated, “we shall -- thanks to the advantages of our terrain and the unity of our nation, prosecute the war until the bitter end” (Document C). Japan had no intentions to surrender until absolutely necessary. This statement is supported through when Japan surrendered.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, in response to World War II and Japan’s vicious attacks on the U.S., the United States launched the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. 80,000 people died, and sixty percent of the city was destroyed. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, in which killed 70,000 people instantaneously and many more in the following weeks. These atomic bombs resulted in pure destruction and chaos for Japan and its people. Although the atomic bombs destroyed part of Japan and took many lives with them, the dropping of the atomic bombs were justified because the U.S. aimed for the complete and utter destruction of Japan and Japan remained a major threat that needed to be eliminated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leading up to the United States’ involvement in World War II, Japan exhibited aggressive imperialistic quests throughout Asia. After an attack on an American military base in Hawaii, the United States would enter combat in an attempt to curb the Japanese aggression. World War II consisted of battles mainly against Germany in Europe and Japan in the Pacific, and the Allies heavily relied on the United States to control the Pacific. American involvement in the Pacific eventually disabled Japanese aggression, as President Harry Truman called for the destruction of major Japanese cities via the atomic bomb. Despite an early advantage in the war, Japan was forced to surrender to the Americans, and as a result, the Allies proved victorious in the…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In April and May of 1945, the America’s Foreign Minister Mamoru Shigemitsu talked with the neutral Swedish ambassador eager to “ascertain what peace terms the United States had in mind (“Institute for Historical Review” 1). In addition, in July of 1945, the Emperor of Japan telegraphed President Truman, insistent on peaceful surrender (1). Japan clearly expresses their desire to peacefully surrender, because their circumstances restrict them from continuing to fight. The US secretary of war, Henry Lewis Stimson is insistent that Japan will surrender without the detonation of the bomb because of their desperate situation: “Japan has no allies; its navy is almost destroyed; its islands are under a naval blockade; and its cities are undergoing concentrated air attacks” (“Was the US justified... “ 1). For that reason, Japan will not fight effectively, therefore devaluing the argument that Japan will be able to fight without surrendering.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, I investigated the sources that were against the use of the bomb before the bomb was dropped including the intentions behind the bomb, and concerns from the Interim Committee . Then I looked at the evidence against the bomb after the bomb was dropped, including Henry Stimson’s concerns, and the horrific loss of Japanese life due to the bomb. It is interesting to see the difference between the worries before the bomb and after the bomb. The first document I looked at was Dropping the Atomic Bomb was Neither Necessary Nor Justifiable by Gar Alperovitz. In his essay he argues one of the reasonings for the use of the bomb was to scare the Soviets and to prevent an invasion of the Red Army in Manchuria.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Apparently, the Japanese didn’t think the Hiroshima bomb was a clear enough message and still did not surrender-- this was a major mistake they made. America then, finally dropped the second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. 60,000 people died instantly. After the bombing on Nagasaki is when Japan finally got the hint to surrender.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In order Asada to be taken serious, he outlines his sources, and and how some contain flaws. Before the U.S.A. arrived, “the Japanese government destroyed much of its archives for fear that the materials might be used in the trails of war criminals” (Asada, 484). The burned information limits the research available. The surviving records include American interrogations of surviving Japanese, this lead to discrepancies within each source (Asada, 484). This forces Asada to look at various sources to reevaluate events leading to Japan surrendering, instead of depending on anecdotal evidence (484-85).…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President Harry Truman was faced with a very difficult decision. He had the magnitude to end the war with Japan once and for all, but would also unleash the world’s most horrific weapon. From four years of war the Americans and civilians were tired, but the Japanese were not backing down. An Allied demand was made for an instantaneous unconditional surrender to the leadership of Japan. The demand clearly stated that the refusal would result in total destruction, but nothing was stated about any new weapons of mass…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Numerous critics and pro-atomic bomb people will inevitably argue that both atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were absolutely necessary to bring a swift end to World War II and save the lives of hundreds of thousands Allied soldiers. However, Japan’s military was already defeated by June 1945; both its naval and air forces had been almost totally obliterated. In fact, Henry Arnold, the commanding General of the Army Air Forces declared in his 1949 memoirs: "It always appeared to us, atomic bomb or no atomic bomb, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” Furthermore, by mid-April of 1945, the United States Joint Intelligence Committee reported that the Japanese leaders were already looking to developing terms of surrender to end the…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this argument, though a popular one among critics of the bombings, is fictitious. According to Thomas Flagel, author of The History Buff’s Guide to World War II, “the cabinet of Prime Minister Suzuki Kantaro agreed to a cease-fire but not capitulation” (284). In other words, Japan would peacefully demilitarize, but would do so on its own terms. The Japanese generals and politicians who refused unconditional surrender would only settle for “‘honorable’” terms, like withholding parts of the Japanese empire that the Allies wanted (Hastings, Inferno 627). Furthermore, on July 26, 1945, several days before the bombing of Hiroshima, the western Allies forewarned the Japanese that, if they refused surrender, their country would be met with “‘prompt and utter destruction;’” however, the Japanese practically disregarded this declaration, thinking that the Allies were threatening more of the usual “firebombing and eventual invasion” (Hastings, Inferno 626-627).…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays