How Should Hiroshima And Nagasaki Be Banned Persuasive Essay

Improved Essays
On August 6, 1945, an American B-29 bomber, notoriously known as ‘Little Boy’, dropped the world’s first atomic bomb used in war on Hiroshima, Japan and instantly killed 60,000 – 80,000 upon impact. A few days later, ‘Fat Man’ (a second, bigger atomic bomb) was dropped on Nagasaki, Japan. Those who became hibakushas, a Japanese word for atomic bomb survivors, were significantly affected and were likely to have their lifespan reduced after radiation exposure. The rest of their lives were characterized by internal injuries, social isolation, and a wide array of problems associated with radiation poisoning. Consequently, the death toll was literally doubled when deaths after the initial bombing was taken into account. Clearly, the atomic bombs imposed on Japan display the sheer ferocity of nuclear warfare, and highlight its danger to humanity. Though effective, atomic bombs are simply too destructive and there are perhaps safer and less severe alternatives. Given the extensive consequences of atomic warfare and the dangers and anxieties it imposes on humanity, all nuclear weapons should banned from existence.
As explained
…show more content…
Numerous critics and pro-atomic bomb people will inevitably argue that both atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were absolutely necessary to bring a swift end to World War II and save the lives of hundreds of thousands Allied soldiers. However, Japan’s military was already defeated by June 1945; both its naval and air forces had been almost totally obliterated. In fact, Henry Arnold, the commanding General of the Army Air Forces declared in his 1949 memoirs: "It always appeared to us, atomic bomb or no atomic bomb, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” Furthermore, by mid-April of 1945, the United States Joint Intelligence Committee reported that the Japanese leaders were already looking to developing terms of surrender to end the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima (Aug. 6) and Nagasaki (Aug. 9) totaled to almost 200,000 Japanese casualties (Document A). President Harry Truman decided to use this horrific weapon considered to be immoral despite other options to force Japan to surrender, ending the second world war. On June 6th, 1945, the Japanese War Council stated, “we shall -- thanks to the advantages of our terrain and the unity of our nation, prosecute the war until the bitter end” (Document C). Japan had no intentions to surrender until absolutely necessary. This statement is supported through when Japan surrendered.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    due to its large military, “The total strength of the Japanese Army was estimated at 5,000,000 men… the major fighting would not end until the latter part of 1946, at the earliest” (Document #3). The size of Japan’s military and the estimated prolonging of the war provided the U.S. with an uncertainty that they would not have liked to accept. To eradicate this uncertainty and provide a rapid end to the war, the U.S. took the opportunity at hand and launched both atomic bombs. In the end, this decision proved triumphant as they evaded a lengthy battle with Japan and ended the long, treacherous…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dropping of atomic bombs is Hiroshima and Nagasaki was one of the most catastrophic bombing is history. It resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and the destruction of more than half of the cities infrastructures. Nonetheless Harry S. Truman and his advisors saw it as the only way to lead Japan to an unconditional surrender. While this is simply the opinion of the United States Commander in Chief and his advisors, there is a lot of controversy as to if it was truly a necessity in forcing Japan to surrender and ending the war. In the “Yes” article, “The Biggest Decision: Why We Had To Drop The Atomic Bomb” by Robert James Maddox argues why dropping atomic bombs in Japan became a necessity when land invasions and the Russians’ mediation were not effective.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the Soviet Union’s invasion of Japanese occupied Manchuria, the Japanese Supreme War Council had begun to vote on the action of surrendering. For this reason, the atomic bomb’s use on Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not needed. Japan would have surrendered sooner than the end of the year. Another reason the atomic bombs were not needed to be used were that Japan’s refusal to surrender was only due in part to the Potsdam Declaration's statement that Japan’s Emperor Hirohito step down from his throne. Evidently, after Japan’s ultimate official surrender on September 2nd, 1945, the Emperor Hirohito was allowed to keep his monarchical position thus proving that the use of the atomic bombs were only barbaric vengeance by the United States.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped bombs killing thousands of people on Japan, which effectively ended the Second World War. The bombings against Japan were necessary because they had warnings and a chance to surrender, things could have ended up worse, and most of all it protected the lives of the US. Japan didn’t have a direct warning that the US was going to bomb them, but there was a statement encouraging Japan to surrender while the bomb was still being talked about. Japan didn’t surrender. For months we dropped more than 63 million leaflets across Japan, warning them of bombings.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States is the only country that used a nuclear weapon in a war. Both atomic bombs were dropped on Japan. The Little Boy was dropped on Hiroshima and the Fat Man dropped on Nagasaki. It all started with President Roosevelt in 1939, when Roosevelt authorized the Manhattan Project, a secret project to expand research on nuclear fission to make nuclear weapons. Truman then became president when Roosevelt died in 1945.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lately, there has been a lot of talk about Obama 's recent visit to Hiroshima, Japan. As the first acting United States President to visit ground zero, and a supporter of ending the use of nuclear weapons, many people were anticipating an apology from President Obama. Additionally, his visit to Japan had risen much controversy over whether bombing Japan needs an apology, and what an apology would say about our country. Although Obama did not issue an apology on his visit, there is still a debate about whether one should be issued in the future. The United States should not apologize for dropping an atomic bomb on Japan since dropping the bomb saved many civilians by avoiding the invasion of Japan.…

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the first day of the bombing, an estimated 100,000 of the Hiroshima population had lost their lives, this figure climbing to 140,000 by the end of the year. Of this statistic, 65 of the city’s 105 doctors had passed away, and 90% of nurses were either dead or incapacitated, leaving medical help scarce. Not only did Little Boy have immediate consequences, its lingering radiation still had an effect on the Japanese population today, the air being lethal to those who survived the vicious…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    usage of the atomic bombs was militarily unnecessary and immoral. Furthermore, it lead to the extensive loss of civilian life, therefore making these bombings justifiable only to a lesser extent. However, supporters of the bombings generally are of the opinion that they were instrumental in the Japanese surrender. These supporters also believe that the bombings were beneficial in preventing casualties on both sides, and helped in protecting America from further attacks, especially by Japan. Even before the atomic bombs were dropped, Japan’s surrender was imminent (Source B, Extract 1).…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Teetering to Surrender: A Critical Analysis of “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration” Individuals see “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration,” by Sadao Asada, as tedious and boring. Including names of different articles and historians can seem useless and insignificant, however I challenge you to see the strengths within this piece. Asada’s academic article puts entertainment and emotional appeal aside to discuss a different side of the Hiroshima bombing then previously emphasized, due to new information. As a result, Asada’s factual article presents a convincing case: the atomic bombs and Russian pressure were both necessary for Japan to finally surrender,…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, world war two was not a disagreement to cause destruction towards the countries. The U.S was justified in dropping atomic bombs as it was an alternative to end the war at an instance and to also prevent the death rate of civilians. This was also necessary as it was America’s desire to shorten the war if the Japanese surrendered. In addition, the USA were acting against the Japanese in…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roughly seventy years ago marked the explosion of the nuclear bombs dropped over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The merciless bombs were dropped on August 6, 1945, by an American officer in the U.S Air Force by the name of Charles W. Sweeney, on a Booing B-29 Superfortress bomber plane during the final stages of World War II (1939-1945). The mid nineteen forty 's was without a doubt a staggering time for the Japanese nation; this was a period loaded with resentment and anger as they glimpsed a massive nuclear bomb headed straight to them as a B-29 bomber fled the scene after destroying almost their entire city. According to an online historical article provided by the history channel titled “Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki”, the impact wiped out nearly 90 percent of the city and killed over 80,000 people instantly before the bomb had even hit the ground; a few thousand later then died because of the immense amount of radiation after affect the bomb…

    • 1322 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays