• Home Page
  • Is Surveillance Considered Unconstitutional?

Is Surveillance Considered Unconstitutional?

Improved Essays
Show More
Is Surveillance Considered Unconstitutional? We are always being watched. It has been proven that the government invades the privacy of every civilian inside the United States and civilians outside of the United States. The United States government tracks every single one of us without our permission. We did not consent to have every little detail of our life be tracked. Strangers are looking into our private lives without us even knowing. This country claims to be the land of the free but we are trapped. This goes against the United States constitution and something has to be done about it. The Guardian has reported that the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) has been collecting the phone records of millions of Americans for quite some …show more content…
Surveillance technology has advanced so much that courts are struggling to define the point at which use of new forms of electronic surveillance constitutes "search and seizure" under the Fourth Amendment. Prior to being elected president, Obama had repeatedly promised to increase the governments sheerness and to provide more truth regarding the use of domestic surveillance. The supporters and opponents of surveillance programs both have expressed their surprise that the Obama administration maintained the surveillance programs that were launched before him by President George W. Bush at the …show more content…
In July 2008, Congress passed the FISA Amendments Act, which basically legalized the government's surveillance programs for another four years. The FISA Amendments Act also granted legal immunity to telecommunications companies that participated in aiding the government's surveillance programs this basically protected them from any future lawsuits. Concern over domestic surveillance has continued during the Obama presidency. In 2011, Congress again renewed the Patriot Act, reinvigorating the debate over domestic surveillance. In March 2012, Senators Ron Wyden and Mark Udall wrote an open letter to Attorney General Eric Holder expressing their concern over ongoing surveillance programs. There is now a significant gap between what most Americans think the law allows and what the government secretly claims the law allows. In December 2012, Congress extended the FISA Amendments Acts for another five years, while also rejecting proposals from Senator Wyden and others to disclose more information to the public on how the law has been interpreted in regard to surveillance

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case Of NSA Surveillance After 9/11 And The Human Right To Privacy
    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Case Of NSA Surveillance After 9/11 And The Human Right To Privacy

    If it is not clearly stated in the constitution then it is unconstitutional. “Just as the NSA program's overwhelming size raises concerns that it is unlawful.” Sinha also looks at the growth of the NSA after 9/11 and it grew immensely. Article #2: Bamford, James. "…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Section 215 Of The Patriot Act
    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Section 215 Of The Patriot Act

    Congress started action upon the issue by confiscating all intelligence-gathering powers from the National Security Agency/Central Security. They attempted to have the expiration of Section 215 of the Patriot Act extended so that with that time colleagues could solve revisions of the Act; however, this request was denied. Congress was then successful in passing the USA Freedom Act, resulting of the confiscation of all citizen call data stored by the National Security Agency/Central…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Edward Snowden Pros And Cons
    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Edward Snowden Pros And Cons

    “The Constitutional Amnesia of the NSA Snooping Scandal” has formed a valid question in my mind. How can President Barack Obama “assure us that we need not be worried about the National Security Agency listening to our phone calls or monitoring out Internet use,” when we are assured by the Fourth Amendment’s “ban on general warrants on indiscriminate searches without probable cause”? How can America’s president possibly think that the NSA’s programs are “healthy for our democracy” when we have an act in place that has informed us that we are not to be searched. My concern does not lie within answering whether or not Edward Snowden is America’s hero, but why Americans have listened to the calming and assuring voice of Obama telling us that searching is okay when we have laws against them doing…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    9/11 Cons
    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    9/11 Cons

    The Fourth Amendment states that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Friedman and Kerr). However, the USA PATRIOT Act amends several parts of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) and Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (Title III) in such a manner that violates the civil liberties granted by the Fourth Amendment (Rackow 1657). FISA, specifically Section 702, permits United States intelligence officials to examine the “communications of foreigners outside the U.S. without a warrant” (Schallhorn), while Title III “established that governmental interception of an individual’s telephone conversation, conducted without the target’s consent, constitutes a search and seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment (Rackow 1658). Specifically, Section 218 of the USA PATRIOT Act alters FISA § 1804(a)(7)(B) such that a federal officer is no longer required to show that the sole purpose of surveillance is to achieve information of foreign intelligence, but…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Pros And Cons Of NSA Warrantless Surveillance
    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of NSA Warrantless Surveillance

    NSA warrantless surveillance controversy Introduction The NSA warrantless surveillance controversy concerns with the surveillance of people within the United States. It all started while the collection of allegedly foreign intelligence by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) was going on as part of the war on terror. The National Security Agency is one of America's largest intelligence organizations. It is similar to the FBI and CIA.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    How Did The Patriot Act Violate Civil Liberties
    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Did The Patriot Act Violate Civil Liberties

    This directly goes against the fourth amendment in the bill of rights of the United States. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was passed in nineteen seventy eight. The United States government used to use FISA and acts like FISA to spy on other nations governments and citizens, the difference with the Patriot Act is, they are spying on their own citizens. “The provisions of Section two hundred and thirteen of the Patriot Act allow federal searches to be conducted and delayed notice to be given to the subject. The subject of the search may never be given notice that a search was conducted if criminal proceedings are not initiated after the search” (the Patriot Act).…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Laws Affecting The Department Of Homeland Security (DHS)
    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Laws Affecting The Department Of Homeland Security (DHS)

    Some of the scandals that have shown that executive powers in the fight against terrorism can be abused include secret prisons abroad, communication interception and detainee abuse. Public mistrust that the fight against terrorism may be costing their civil liberties is justifiable when the government eavesdrops on their private conversations. The fourth amendment of the constitution clearly stipulates explicitly that persons have the right to be secure in their persons, papers and effects, and their rights against unreasonable searches and seizures must not be violated. Any official surveillance of international calls or emails of Americans within the U.S required an approval from FISC (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court), but there have been reports of government eavesdropping despite the presence of legal…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Domestic Surveillance Research Paper
    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Domestic Surveillance Research Paper

    An article titled, “Electronic Surveillance,” written by Cornell University states, “Obtaining a warrant for electronic surveillance requires showing probable cause, describing in particularity the conversation to be intercepted, providing a specific time period for the interception of the communications device, and noticing the property owner unless law enforcement can show exigent circumstances. As with ordinary searches and seizures, exigent circumstances may serve as grounds for law enforcement to dispense with first obtaining a warrant. If law enforcement encounters a situation threatening a person's life, a conspiracy threatening the national security, or a conspiracy suggesting organized crime, then law enforcement may proceed without first acquiring a warrant.” The U.S. has clearly been using surveillance technology unconstitutionally.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is The Fourth Amendment Important
    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is The Fourth Amendment Important

    Americans had experienced this privacy invasion with the British many times. Before the revolution, British claimed the authority to issue Writs of Assistance allowing officials to enter private homes in search for evidence of smuggling. Writs of Assistance never expired and were transferable. The federalists violate the fourth amendment on a daily basis. When federal agency collects our electric data, emails, phone calls, and other private information, that violates this amendment, if they don’t have a legitimate reason.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment: Search And Seizure
    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment: Search And Seizure

    The Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure In the Fourth Amendment, it states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated” (Cornell University of Law). The Fourth Amendment states its main idea in this statement and through it American citizens and their belongings and records are protected from surveillance, searches, and seizures. However, in today’s digital world government officials have used what could be called an unconstitutional approach to the Fourth Amendment, causing them to monitor phone conversations. There have also been instances where personal records have been gained by law enforcement without any relevant reason.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Privacy In The United States
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Importance Of Privacy In The United States

    According to the United Nations, privacy is basic human right that should be protected by law. The United States Constitution also implies a right to privacy in the Fourth Amendment. Recent laws passed by the government have raised questions about whether the government’s actions infringe upon a citizen’s right to privacy. The USA Patriot Act was the first of many laws that increased the powers of government organizations such as the NSA and the FBI. The law allowed these agencies to access private records of US citizens without the need of a warrant or judge’s consent.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Patriot Act: The Dangers Of The Patriot Act
    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Patriot Act: The Dangers Of The Patriot Act

    The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The USA Patriot Act Controversy
    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The USA Patriot Act Controversy

    After the introduction of the Patriot Act, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was affected by allowing surveillance criteria standards to be lowered. Both the Patriot Act itself and its changes made to FISA have both shown a lack of regard for the Fourth Amendment (Jaeger, Bertot, & McClure, 2003). Furthermore, one of its criticisms is that it is not completely liable to be held to the guidelines of the Fourth Amendment. This is referencing the procedure that is meant to be followed before the approval of invading privacy is given. FISA allows for search and wiretapping approval to be obtained without evidence that suggests criminal involvement (Jaeger, Bertot, & McClure, 2003).…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Patriot Act
    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Patriot Act

    The United States has developed into a super power nation and the world has felt the presence from the States. From the early 2001 terrorist attacks, the U.S. has been a hotspot of continuous terrorist attacks and groups forming in order to have a larger presence in the middle east. The U.S.’s presence in the middle east led to a record length war known as the War on Terror. Recent terror attacks in the U.S. have shown to provoke action from the government such as the Patriots Act. Islam has also grown to play a large part in the U.S. and the way the people of the U.S. function.…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Importance Of The NSA
    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Importance Of The NSA

    The center on law and security (2007) states, “Critics of the NSA program do not necessarily object to the type of surveillance, but rather to the way in which it has been authorized, and to the absence of any oversight”…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings