Arguments Against Section 215 Of The Patriot Act

Improved Essays
In The United States of America the National Security Agency has been working for ages to assure that the country is safe, but recently it has become a rising concern that they have overstepped their boundaries of American citizen’s privacy by operating surveillance technology all around the country and storing data form every phone call of citizens. With the American Citizens’ privacy at stake, each branch of government took its stand against the matter. The Judicial Branch has to come up with a legal compromise; the Legislative Branch and Congress are working to make surveillance laws that would better please its citizens, and the Executive Branch and the president have agreed to come up with an alternative to Section 215 of The Patriot Act. The Supreme Court has to establish a legal compromise to the surveillance of the American citizens considering it was said that what the National Security Agency/Central Security was doing went against Section 215 of the Patriot Act. When the case was first presented to The Supreme Court, they recognized that Section 215 was soon to expire; therefore, they sent the case back down to the lower court for further transaction. They then approved the USA Freedom Act which was a compromise among the top law makers pushing surveillance revision and the House Republican leadership. …show more content…
Congress started action upon the issue by confiscating all intelligence-gathering powers from the National Security Agency/Central Security. They attempted to have the expiration of Section 215 of the Patriot Act extended so that with that time colleagues could solve revisions of the Act; however, this request was denied. Congress was then successful in passing the USA Freedom Act, resulting of the confiscation of all citizen call data stored by the National Security Agency/Central

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance. Plan: The government will curtail its surveillance by only viewing collected data by means of a warrant. Intro-After the NSA reported their first transparency avowal, the publisher Omicron Technology Limited stated, “The report said 19,212 "national security letters"—administrative subpoenas that allow the FBI to collect information without a warrant—were issued last year, containing 38,832 requests for information.” These unwarranted leaks are why this problem needs to be solved. That is why we stand resolved that “The United States federal government should substantially curtain its domestic surveillance.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Josh Rozdolsky Saleh The Patriot Act United States History What would everyday life look like when the government can look through everyone's private information? The Patriot Act violates Civil Liberties and is Unconstitutional by restricting the First Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights of Americans. The Patriot Act violates freedom of religion and speech.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fisa Pros And Cons

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Several benefits of FISA have over years been witnessed. Since its enactment, FISA has been an important tool in the fight against intelligence collection by foreign powers or its agents with an aim of exploiting the underlying US government policies or even to establish its future strategies illegally. The USA Patriot Act has seen FISA expand its strategies in exposition of foreign terrorist groups and combating them in good time. This has seen the US government win the war against terrorism and extremism. The Act has also see reduction of purported threats and acts of terrorism to national security.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    After the dramatic and horrible acts committed on September 11, 2001, the world was in shock. The magnitude of the terrorist attacks were nothing to be overlooked. The United States knew they had to find a way to keep the people calm and in a safe place. Forty-five days after the terrorist attacks on the nation, Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act, acronym for the “ Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” Act. The acts primitive intentions wants to find and prosecute any terrorist suspect in any corner of the nation.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the suspect would change out his cell phone this new law allowed agents to track this new device and any device they bought after that without obtaining a new search warrant every time. The Patriot Act also made it easier for law enforcement to obtain records from places like businesses or banks. In many cases there was not a whole lot of evidence to link an individual to a crime. So it was important to find out if they had gone to a store and bought materials to make a bomb. They might also want to get bank records and find out if a person had made contributions to a terrorist organization.…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Patriot Act Essay

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Sounds like some McCarthyism to me. But, that only seems to impede upon due process. C. After the recent NSA leaks, we have a better picture of what we have lost with this legislation and others like it. As Randy Barnett states in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, “the problem with the data collection orders issues to Verizon and other telecommunications companies become obvious. These orders require the company to produce “on an ongoing daily basis ...…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    October 26,2001, just a little bit over a year after the most infamous terrorist attacks on the US, the USA PATRIOT Act was signed into law by President George W. Bush. The expanded full title is “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Require to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. ” This act quickly caused controversy and sparked many debates about national security and civil liberties because it created legislative changes which significantly increased the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement agencies in the United States without providing a system of checks and balances to safeguard civil liberties. The only Senator to oppose the Act, was Russ Feingold.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The USA Patriot Act is a ten letter acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. This act was passed in the wake of the September 11th terrorist attacks on the world trade center. It was an act of congress that passed six weeks after on October 26, 2001. This was signed into law by George W. Bush. The Patriot Act was passed almost unanimously by the senate with a vote of 98 to 1 and it passed in the house 357 to 66.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Its intent was to give the FBI and NSA access to more private information if that person was deemed a suspect in terrorism. But since the act was rushed through Congress, there were opportunities for…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    NSA warrantless surveillance controversy Introduction The NSA warrantless surveillance controversy concerns with the surveillance of people within the United States. It all started while the collection of allegedly foreign intelligence by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) was going on as part of the war on terror. The National Security Agency is one of America's largest intelligence organizations. It is similar to the FBI and CIA.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, I argue against government surveillance advocates. In recent years, many whistle blowers have come out and making awareness of the government activities. The surveillance is deposing the citizens privacy and rise the concern to what the government intent is. Additionally, the activities that take place under the government surveillance program strike citizens over their rights-to-privacy. Not-only-but-also, it violates the constitutional right of unreasonable search and seizure warrantlessly.…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In July 2008, Congress passed the FISA Amendments Act, which basically legalized the government's surveillance programs for another four years. The FISA Amendments Act also granted legal immunity to telecommunications companies that participated in aiding the government's surveillance programs this basically protected them from any future lawsuits. Concern over domestic surveillance has continued during the Obama presidency. In 2011, Congress again renewed the Patriot Act, reinvigorating the debate over domestic surveillance. In March 2012, Senators Ron Wyden and Mark Udall wrote an open letter to Attorney General Eric Holder expressing their concern over ongoing surveillance programs.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 21st century, security is a difficult thing to maintain with all the technology and social media that is available we have on hand. Information is entirely too easy to obtain if you put it on the internet, but what if you don’t? The information you share on social media is fair game but the information you share in the privacy over the phone during a call should be respected. Security should not invade liberties without going up for a vote to support the democracy system we have in the country today. The NSA ran a convert operation, ACT 215, where they would tap phones to collect information in the hopes of finding terrorist activity, but the their efforts were futile.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deplorable crimes and factors have pushed the government to take extreme measures regarding the issue of national security. In order to preserve the order and public safety of every citizen it has been introduced the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) which contradicts the ideals of the founding fathers reflected in the Fourth Amendment. The ratification of this act has been of great controversy. Personally, as Benjamin Franklin expressed is not “essential liberty” what it is guaranteed to its citizens when governmental agencies access to the people’s private life. Giving up this right without questioning is like not understanding the importance of this principle.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays