Informed Consent: The Tuskegee Study

Improved Essays
Informed consent requires physicians to provide patients with enough information regarding the diagnosis, the nature and purpose of treatment, the possible risks, alternatives and benefits of a treatment. According to the FDA, research subjects must understand that they may not benefit from the clinical trial (although they may get personal treatment benefits of a treatment) On the other hand, implied consent is not explicitly granted but is inferred by a person’s actions and the circumstances. In the Tuskegee study, researchers observed those already affected with syphilis but deliberately refused to give the subjects treatment. The problem was that patients were told they were being treated but never received any treatment. Hence, one of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Acquiring informed consent from patients, whether it’s for research or medical purposes, is a requirement by law. But back then, it wasn’t as important as it is today. Informed consent is when a person grants permission after they learn of all possible consequences and results. Not only is it unlawful to do something to a person without their knowledge, it is also unethical. People have a moral right to their body.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, they must acquire Informed Consent, meaning an individual must be given all the information relating to the medical proceedings in a comprehensible manner. In addition, the individual must agree to participate in the research voluntarily. Secondly, there must be an assessment of risks and benefits. This is basically stating that the research may not be conducted if the risks outweigh the benefits.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was not uncommon for physicians to conduct research on patients without their knowledge in the 1950’s. Much confusion and frustration toward the Lacks’ family originated when the doctors collected Henrietta’s cells for research without consent or informed consent. When Henrietta was on the operating table, her cells were taken without knowledge or consent. Consent is simply the agreeance for something to happen or permission to commit a certain act. Informed consent means: you are informed and have received information about your health condition and treatment options; you understand your health condition and different treatments options; and you are capable of deciding what treatment you want and give consent to receive it (U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2015).…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of the fundamental rights of a patient is to protect their privacy, which was violated in Henrietta Lacks case and also she did not give consent for her cells to be extracted. Even though Hela cells have been the foundation for learning about any process that occurs in human cells (Lucey, Nelson & Hutchin, 2009) I still think it is unethical the way the specimen was obtained. The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Revised Common Rule states that informed consent should be presented to individuals and they should understand the risk and benefit of the study.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Gey did not inform the family that he was conducting research on Henrietta’s cells and certainly did not let them know he was going to publically present her cells and announce on television that based on her cells he could find a cure for cancer. We believe that an Informed Consent means to disclose any and all information to the subjects and ensure their comprehension of the information provided and to adequately inform the subjects about the study being carried out, encompassing past results from any previous studies and the results from those studies, as well as, any present participation to be expected from the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although both, Skloot and Callaway, assert that patients must receive an informed consent, Callaway’s argument is based…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot, provides insight to scientific development issues in the mid 1900’s through the eyes of the Lacks family, the scientists involved, and the author herself. Three key issues discussed in this book are the ethics of informed consent for research, the ethics of genetic engineering, and how scientists relay information to people who are not experts in their areas of practice. The foundation of this book revolves around the ethical issue of consent in research and when it is necessary. In the mid 1950’s there were very few laws about doctors and scientists obtaining informed consent from patients before treating them, experimenting on them, or taking tissues or sample cells from them…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Informed Consent

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. All subjects will have two meetings regarding the informed consent form. The first will be a group session before the medical testing and will discuss the study purpose, goals, design, and what their participation entails. Furthermore, study design will be explained thoroughly such as what placebo-controlled means and what a sentinel block is. The second meeting will be a one-on-one session with subjects after completing their medical tests.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consent divides in three categories • Voluntary consent for treatment is solely based on individual decision, this must not being influence by anyone involved in individual life. • Informed individual has being given all the relevant information about treatment, the benefits and the risks and consequences if treatment is refused. • Capacity individual must…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In class I learned about the Tuskegee study and the different types of drugs used and abused by Nazis and German physicians. The Tuskegee study is very important because it has a huge impact on how we conduct research today. The Nazi and the people who did the Tuskegee experiments are very similar because they either used drugs or innocent people for their own selfish reasons. German doctors gave methamphetamine drug Pervitin to Nazi soldiers to enhance their energy to fight better in World War 2. The Germans supplied them with this drug because the idea was that they can turn a regular guy into a super soldier.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tuskegee Syphilis Essay

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The doctors had no proof that the black men wanted to participate in the experiment. The participants needed to be informed of the experiment and all of the risks that came with it. However, the men were never informed and consent was never given, not even verbally. Informed consent states any risks involved with the experiment and makes them aware to the participants.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Informed consent is a necessary process that it is supposed to protect the participant, not the research. During the process, the patient is informed of all aspects of the trial, informed of their rights, the purpose of the study and all of its procedures, potential risks and benefits, and length of study (Nijhawan, 2013). Consent can only be voluntarily given if the participant is given full information and understands the documents and the explanations regarding the trials and furthermore does not receive any other encouragement or reinsurances that the trial will end with a positive result. In Jesse’s case, exactly the opposite happened. He was never fully informed of all aspects of the trial that would have allowed him to give his informed consent.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Informed consent occurs after the candidates for the study have been chosen. In this case, there was a moral failure in the participant selection. Informed consent is irrelevant when considering the moral failure of justice in the context mentioned…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is the theory that the right decision is that which produces the greatest amount of good, everyone considered. The strengths of this theory is that we are not simply considered our own selfish wants, but the good of all people. The struggle we often have with this concept is that utilitarianists are forced to make decisions where there is often a lot of collateral damage. That begs the question as to whether the good created is greater than the loss. The Tuskegee experiments are a perfect example of this principle.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In healthcare, the decisions around patients should be utmost to the benefit of the patient. Beneficence is the ethical principle that underlines that. As Edge & Groves stated, it is the practitioners’ obligation to promote decisions to better the health of a patient while not inhibiting a patient’s right to autonomy (2006). Any decisions made available to patients should be for the good. John Cutler, the study doctor of the Tuskegee group, stated in Deadly Deception that the withholding of treatment of antibiotics was beneficial because it would interfere the end result of the study.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays