Hostage Crisis

Improved Essays
Summary of Who, Where, and Why during Hostage Negotiation
Perry B Keaton

Critical Issues in Hostage Negotiations - 1
Instructor: Anthony Zambito
October 13, 2015

Summary of Who, Where, and Why during Hostage Negotiation-1

When dealing with hostage negotiation why these three words are are so important and vital. I will try and show you the reason and importance of these words in reference to hostage when they are held captive. When face with a hostage crisis or situation I believe of the three why is the upmost important of them all. The reason I am putting it as the most important is because during the negotiation process it tell the hostage taker that we are willing to listen to their demand and to limit the stress
…show more content…
“Where in relationship to the hostage crisis consist of the place it being committed or the location of the hostage that is being held. By knowing the where about of the victim it is easier for the negotiator to try and communicate. A good example of “where “would the high jacking of TWA airliner enroot to Athens that occurred in 1985.

Another example of where can occur in your own home in which happen to a couple in Maryland in 1979 when the perpetrator Joseph Palczynski entered their establishment and them captive. In this ordeal the perpetrator did survive. There is also good chance that it can also happen on aboard a cruise ship as it was demonstrated aboard an Achilles Lauro cruise ship on October 7, 1985 while in Egyptian waters. So as we can see it does matter to a hostage taker, either on land, air, or the sea it can happen when you least expect too.

The final one of the three can also be of some importance when it comes to hostage negotiation. The “who” can be referred to a person? It can fall into several categories such as the following mentally ill, psychopathic personality disordered, extremists, or criminals. Of the four in this category I would consider the most dangerous one to be mentally ill due to all the different moods changes they will

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Armed Conflict Case Study

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages

    | | |[pic]Human rights exist only as a result of the proper discipline of military forces.…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    East Area Rapists

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Another, more recent, case involving serial rape is that of the East Area Rapist, also known as the Golden State Killer. The East Area Rapist was known to take small mementos from his victims after raping them, starting in 1976. It was not until ten years later that he took to killing his victims. The East Area Rapist boggled law enforcement for many years, managing to commit crimes for so long without slipping up. The criminal was connected to the killings after he shot at a woman and her husband, the evidence matching up with previous descriptions of the East Area Rapist.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smyrna Prison Case Study

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Security problem that JTVCC is constantly facing is a total inmate tack over. At any moment the inmates could ban together and take over the faculty holding countless guards, nurses, counselors, or even civilians that may be there just visiting. Smyrna Prison is at a higher risk than the other prisons in the State of Delaware for a number of reasons. A major reason is that Smyrna Prison houses the higher risk life offenders. S1- Building is currently housing 87 inmates with a combined prison sentence of over 870 years.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1979 Long Island, New York, an Iranian family struggles to survive amidst the Iranian hostage crisis. . BRIEF SYNOPSIS: It’s 1979, Long Island, New York. The SHIRAZI family struggles to survive amidst the Iranian hostage situation. Protesters at the White House demand the deportation of all Iranian immigrants.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second American Crisis

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The First and Second American Crisis The first American crisis started after the Articles of Confederation were issued. These articles shaped the constitution of the United States at that time and limited the power of the central government over the country. Individual state government had more power than the central government. This limited power that the central government had at that time prevented it from passing several laws including the taxation laws.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Iran-Contra Affair

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Iran-Contra Affair, of 1986, quickly made the headlines in newspapers worldwide. The sale of arms to Iran that were to improve U.S. influence in Middle Eastern countries would become more than just that. The Iran-Contra Affair portrays how President Reagan and other politicians had broken their oath by giving into negotiation with terrorists and breaking other laws. There were many nations involved in this affair. The main ones were the United States, Iran, and Nicaragua (Weiss et al.1).…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As John F. Kennedy said during the Inaugural Address on January 20, 1961, “Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate” (John F. Kennedy). A crisis-negotiation is when a perpetrator has either taken hostages or holds up within a location refusing to give himself up to the police, in which a negotiation team must become involved. Negotiation originated in the 1970s in New York City, for dealing with crime and political events with distinctive features of hostage-taking. When it first started the term Hostage Negotiation Team (HNT) was used to describe the police unit then it got renamed it to the Crisis Negotiation Team (CNT).…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All were on a first name basis and the hostages started to fear the police instead of their captors. The hostages were threatened with physical harm, yet they still did not fear them. They even started to like them. Once the police finally captured Jan and Clark, two women yelled to police, “Don’t hurt them— they didn’t harm us.” They were completely immersed in their abductors’ world that they did not want anything done to keep them from seeing Jan and Clark (Klein 1).…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some strategies that we have learned from the course material worked well. For example, our several strategies, which is mainly from the class lecture and the “Distributive Bargaining” article, including lowballing, flinching, using silence, good cop-bad cop, and taking time, really helped us to induce our counterpart to release their information, convince them, and reach the favorable outcome. For my future negotiation, I may need to care counterpart’s emotion while maintaining my composure. The biggest failure that leads us to a rupture of our 1985 negotiation was emotional conflicts.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, sharing mutual interests will ensure a smooth negotiation. Saying so I aim to prepare myself with clearly defined objectives and BATNAs. Also, inculcate the ability to maintain balance between being soft and…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cuban Missile Crisis

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a dangerous confrontation between the US and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. This is when the US and Soviet Union came the closest to nuclear warfare. The situation was different in a number of ways, featuring confirmations and non supported directions as well as direct communications and miscommunications between both the US and Soviet Union (Office). The overwhelming conflict was also being judged by the fact that it was basically played out at the White House and the Kremlin level with very little say from the respective organizations typically involved in the foreign policy stages (Office).…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In many different situations, an action must be decided on. Mill and Kant each present two major theories as to how this decision is reached and how it can be judged as morally right or wrong. In the given predicament of Rescue I and Rescue II, each philosopher would argue for a different ethical approach based on the fundamental principles of their individual theories components of their theories. John Stuart Mills is famous for his views on utilitarianism. His view is revised from his teacher Jeremy Bentham’s theory of crude utilitarianism which introduces the Greatest Happiness Principle().…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Late Paper I. Rank the characters, Professor Freud, Kim, Arnold, Cindy, Phillip, and Mary from one to six in the order you feel they deserve blame/responsibility for the outcome. Number 1 would be the most responsible, and Number 6 would be the least responsible. Explain and defend your rankings. 1. KIM…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln Movie Negotiation

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Meanwhile, Pirzadeh (2014) defined that negotiation is a process or method to settle the differences between two parties by providing the best possible outcomes as many as possible that satisfy both parties. In the Lincoln movie, the elements of negotiation that are highlighted which are the parties and their interest, interdependency and last but not least decision-making ability. The first element is the parties and their interest. The parties that involved in the negotiation process in Lincoln movie are the United State’s President which is Lincoln the and Representatives of Democratic.…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bargaining process began with both parties stated their willingness to negotiate and to reach the mutual benefits. They acknowledged each other interdependence and contribution that were produced from their relationship. Therefore, we could see that their motivation was primarily to maximize joint outcome. Also, this situation described a key attitude in collaborative negotiation, which tried to address the best solution for both sides, not as a win-lose negotiation. We could see that they did not show meaningful aggressiveness while negotiating, and instead, they shared information and treat each other with understanding and respect.…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays