Death Penalty Bad

Improved Essays
Is The Death Penalty a Bad Public Policy?
The justice system in the United States is nowhere near perfect, but over the years it has been molded and developed in such ways that it is currently working to the best of it’s ability. The death penalty is a largely controversial in today’s society; there are many arguments both for and against the death penalty. Realistically though, the death penalty is necessary. While each state has the right to their own decisions about whether to install the death penalty or not, federally, capital punishment is still used. The death penalty is arguably expensive and morally wrong, although for tremendously heinous crimes it could be justified.
The biggest defense against the use of capital punishment in
…show more content…
It really holds to each individual’s belief in the proper way of punishing criminals and their own standard of what is defined as cruel and unusual. In retrospect, the death penalty might have many viable arguments against its use, but the only argument that I can hold true and reasonable debate to be true is the essence of justice. Those who spend life in prison are certainly not in likable conditions but they still have a warm place to sleep, medical care, resources, and three meals a day, unlike their victims. Capital punishment might not offer any deterrence of future murderers or terrorists but it offers justice for the victim, in addition to a peace of mind for the victim’s family. Individuals, who feel strongly about keeping the death penalty in place, are sometimes quick to suggest that it be imposed on a large variety of criminals such as rapists. The current standard for the death penalty, in my opinion, is effective the way it is and it should be preserved. The execution of rapists, even child sex offenders, would be considered cruel and unusual with the reason that the victim didn’t die. While those victims might be seriously disturbed for the duration of their lives, they were not robbed of their life unlike homicide victims. The death penalty for murderers and terrorists, with the exclusion of juveniles and incompetent individuals, is generally an effective policy in the sense that it offers retribution. The minimal deterrence that it might impose on other criminals, is better than none and also worth it if it does instill some thought within criminals who have the potential to become

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I honestly do not full heartedly support the death penalty, but I think there are rare cases in which it would be just and in the best interest of the safety of the general public. Justice can be defined as being “fair, impartial, [and] giving a deserved response” (“List of the Virtues”). If the trial for the crime is fairly administered, and we are certain with no doubt that the person on death row is guilty, the death penalty ought to be justified. Not every crime or even murder mandates the use of capital punishment. However, if the just punishment for the crime is the death penalty, the executioner and those involved in the conviction could still be considered virtuous because they are being just.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He stands firm on his first argument, saying that the death penalty is not only the best but the only deterrent to crime. Ernest says the objection of life imprisonment is a light slap on the wrist and is not geared enough. Imprisonment only gives murderers more time to plot and scheme it does not change other criminal minds about making the same mistake. Some opponents of Haag stand argue that people have a right to life and morally we should not use capital punishment. An objection that Haag uses is that the right to life is forfeited if the crime that is broken is severe enough.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This shows the people of America should be very conducive of the death penalty with a stat like this. America has a lot of problems and it can eliminate serious crimes with the death penalty that would be one less thing to worry about. “It is available for murder, armed robbery and aggravated rape — involving dangerous weapons, more than one ­perpetrator, where grievous ­bodily harm results or where the victim is younger than 10” (Callick). In India they made rules about when the death penalty should and should not be used. In the quote above this is when it should be used.…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Debate

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe it is a great advantage because it can lower a great amount of people attempting murder. It intimidates future criminals from making crimes as well as performs revenge to the criminal and that shouldn 't be seen in a wrong way. There are many arguments against the death penalty, but they are usually not valid when looked deeply into the topic. It is important that all states come to an agreement and use death penalty rather than some states being legal and some not. The death penalty is useful in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imposing The Death Penalty

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital punishment can be a tough topic to discuss because people tend to have extreme views and opinions on it. The death penalty is a quality to society; it prevents possible criminals as well as serves revenge to criminals, and is in no way depraved. The arguments contrary to the death penalty regularly do not hold up when examined more thoroughly. It is vital that everyone is united on this subject, rather than having some states practice capital punishment while others do not. The death penalty can be a beneficial tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the nastiest crimes known to society.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But a number of people are still against the death penalty for moral reasons, even though, it would bring them safety. In Stanley Marcus’s article, “Public Safety Requires the Death Penalty” Marcus questions convicted murderers about their crimes, “they had no hesitation in killing again and again because they were subject to no more severe punishment than if they were convicted of robbery - and often even less.” (New York Times Article Marcus). We need capital punishment to frighten criminals and to get rid of them when they do wrong. Clearly, these criminals have no morals about killing, so why should we risk our safety to keep them alive? The convicted killers even admitted that they had no hesitation in killing the first time and they would have no hesitation killing again.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty, often known as capital punishment, is the punishment of execution given to a person who has been legally convicted of a crime. It has been a highly controversial issue, and there are many American citizens who support this system, and many who do not. Some argue that the criminals who have been sentenced to death deserve to die, to pay for the harm that they have done to others. They also view execution as a deterrent for crime. However, the system has not been successful in reducing crime in our society, and I do not see how it will do so in the future.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a reason why capital punishment is still in question after all these decades. Even if the death penalty gives the choice to place killers on death row for committing their crimes person, they can be discriminated, and wrongfully placed behind bars. The death penalty gives justice, but if a life is taken, it cannot be brought back. This punishment has too many flaws to…

    • 1069 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Against Death Penalty

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gray really cuts into the real reasons here that we as “scared” people, the majority, are ok with the death penalty. It helps put to ease our minds that a person commits a crime, will be taken care of in a manner fitting to that of their crime. In conclusion, the death penalty should not be abolished. “The death penalty question is often framed in utilitarian terms of net balance: rights of victims versus rights to life of the convicted” (House, 680). We as a society should keep in mind the rights of the victims.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning Capital Punishment

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Capital punishment helps to prevent future crime. This severe punishment will discourage or intimidate would-be criminals from illegal action. Since society are concern in putting an end to murder, harshest punishment should be implement to deter murder, and it is non-other than capital punishment. Subsequently it will convince potential murderers to think twice before executing someone for fear of losing their own life. Punishments which are swift and solid are the best deterrent.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics