Capital Punishment Essay: The Justification Of The Death Penalty

Decent Essays
The Capital Punishment is a very questionable controversy among numerous people. In this world there is a difference when comparing malicious and benevolent people. Jonathon Kay proclaims, “rational thinkers don’t murder 2 year-old children. They do it because they are evil. And that is why we long to see these criminals die… repaying blood with blood” (Kay). The Death Penalty dictates whether or not criminals who have committed terrible crimes deserve the right to live. This issue is serious and it matters because it decides the fate and course of a human life. The Capital Punishment should still be intact because it is appropriate punishment for the inappropriate crimes, lowers number of criminals, and brings closure to victim’s relatives. …show more content…
The “taxpayers have spent more than four billion dollars on capital punishment since 1978” (Banks). The death penalty is asking too much of taxpayers because paying money to kill people is unlawful. It may violate the morals of many people because they are aiding the killing of people by helping to pay for it. A “sentence to life without parole would be more honest and less expensive. We’ve created a system that’s not just unconstitutional arbitrary” (Banks). By spending a bunch of money through taxpayers, people lose money and are not able to use it for any other situations in their life. People’s money is being used to put others to death, so what makes them better than the criminals.
The Capital Punishment is an extremely serious matter because it deciphers whether or not a person lives or dies. The pros to the Death Penalty are it is deserved punishment, brings closure, and it keeps criminals off the streets. The cons are innocent people can be brought to death, racial discrimination, and paying for death is both cost ineffective and unlawful. Maybe in the nearby future or later on, the question on whether or not the Capital Punishment’s place should be in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Death Penalty Debate

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When a person commits an awful crime, it takes over society on many levels. It takes away many lives of victims, peace they deserve, and liberty from the society. Death penalty given as a severe punishment brings peace to society and punishes the criminal for his wrongs. Budziszewski states, “Deserved punishment protects society morally by restoring this just order, making the wrongdoer pay a price equivalent to the harm he has done.” . Punishment also helps murder victims families become more less on their toes but rather justice will be served and they wont have to live in fear anymore.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We are taught from an early age that two wrongs do not make a right. In that sense, when one condones capital punishment, which is murdering a being under lawful ruling for a heinous crime done, we are saying we have the right to take someone’s life. The question is, by achieving this, are we less guilty? Capital punishment has more flaws than the justice it has to offer; it should be abolished. Capital punishment should be abolished because there are too many innocent people sentenced to death, death penalty trials are much more expensive than life imprisonment, there are botched executions, unfairness against the economically disadvantaged, and racism is present in the trials.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He points out that executor jobs are just as degrading and uncomfortable as any other job can be, and also makes a strong statement on how the death penalty is a way of catharsis that directly affected victims and communities get. These points are effective in favor for the death penalty. However, Mencken’s argument that death row prisoners, after running out of appeals, should not have to wait long terms of time until they are put to death is not reasonable. These murderers should be allowed to suffer alive during the long wait because of their horrible…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I would tell those people that burglars do not deserve the death penalty like murderers do because, like I stated earlier, the quantity of pain or negative value is far greater when taking a life rather than taking jewelry. Jewelry can be replaced at a financial burden whereas taking a life is gone for…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On the other hand, people who are up on the death penalty could be innocents that were falsely accused. Also, the death penalty cost the government a lot of money and is usually racially biased. The death penalty should be abolished because the government contributing unnecessary large amount of funding, it’s racially biased, and could be killing innocent and violates our rights. The government funds vast amount of money just to kill someone on death penalty. The amount of money required for the…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Imposing The Death Penalty

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital punishment can be a tough topic to discuss because people tend to have extreme views and opinions on it. The death penalty is a quality to society; it prevents possible criminals as well as serves revenge to criminals, and is in no way depraved. The arguments contrary to the death penalty regularly do not hold up when examined more thoroughly. It is vital that everyone is united on this subject, rather than having some states practice capital punishment while others do not. The death penalty can be a beneficial tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the nastiest crimes known to society.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People fail to realize that they have become desensitized by the corruption of common day movies, games, and news. All of the corruption that we have seen plays a role on what we believe in today’s society, but it takes a courageous and faithful person to know that the death penalty is not correct and should be abolished. Agreeing with the death penalty puts civilians at the same mental level of those who commit murder, because they yearn for the unjust punishment to end someone’s life. After gathering research, roughly 120 out of 3,000 inmates that are currently facing death row might be innocent (Drehle). Many death row cases are based on eyewitness information, because the case lacks leads from other sources, which leaves the prosecutors to relay on the eyewitness, as described in the innocent execution of Carlos Luna (10 Convicts Presumed Innocent After Execution, 2010).…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Criminals get the easy way out of all the shame and guilt they feel. The death penalty should be abolished, due to pitiful Supreme Court cases and alternatives to the irrevocable death penalty.…

    • 1825 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Against Death Penalty

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gray really cuts into the real reasons here that we as “scared” people, the majority, are ok with the death penalty. It helps put to ease our minds that a person commits a crime, will be taken care of in a manner fitting to that of their crime. In conclusion, the death penalty should not be abolished. “The death penalty question is often framed in utilitarian terms of net balance: rights of victims versus rights to life of the convicted” (House, 680). We as a society should keep in mind the rights of the victims.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    laws because in the code of Hammurabi laws were a lot more cruel than in the U.S. Back then, you would get harmed extremely bad when you were given the death penalty, but in the U.S. there’s either an injection or getting electrocuted. My opinion on the code of Hammurabi and death penalty cases is the code of Hammurabi to me was highly unfair because for example, if someone didn’t witness and individual buying an animal he or she would get killed because there wasn’t no witness which means they committed robbery when innocent people were killed just because there wasn’t a witness and that is absolutely unfair. My opinion on death penalty cases is they are fair but not all laws. One of the laws that if you break your are given the death penalty is robbing a bank and killing someone during the process. I think it’s unfair and dumb to give someone the death penalty for doing something like that because there are people who have killed and robbed someone and they just get a certain amount of years in prison and not get the death penalty, so why is a bank so special and a human being who is being robbed and ends up killed not?…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics