Essay On Independent Commission

Improved Essays
I think independent commission would be better for a case or opposition for gerrymandering. There isn't really enough information to measure the effectiveness of the independent to make a more informed decision. Sure in the video it talks about how many republicans, how many democrats, other political parties out the group. The video or information doesn't tackle about the rules of politics: who, what when, where or how on many levels. What was the process of choosing the people for the independent commissions? Where do these chosen people live at on a individual bases. What are the demographic of these people's age, gender, race, economic wise. You need a diversity of people from several different communities with several …show more content…
How are the independent commission compensated for their time and work leading to the decision of drawing redirecting lines. The answer is the process and the intention that will make the old way of doing things work or not work. I would say on the surface the independent commission sounds good. Yes, I think we should give the independent commission a try, but should limit the number of states we try it in until we are able to see the positive results and where to fine-tune it. I think it can succeed, but only with the consideration of the questions I posed previously and even more question to be asked before, during, after the process has been initially implemented. I don't believe it should stay in the hands of the state legislature the redistricting. I think there should be town hall meeting where a third party that has no ties with politician or politics either directly or indirectly. Where the third party is not paid or coerced by political figures or those even remotely related politicians in office present, future, past. This is not to say at a later time after the independent commission and some from the different communities that want to attend meetings to get this information cannot get information from state legislature at a public meeting where they present their case on how and why the map should be drawn a certain

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Judge Justice (along with the other judges) found that The Legislative Redistricting Board did not take redistricting seriously, but instead they did what they wanted. Another issue that was brought up in the case was the multimember districts in Dallas and Bexar. Representatives in these districts are elected but minorities seem to be underrepresented. The Legislative Redistricting Board had the lines drawn so there could be political success. The decision that was made brought controversy so this case was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court (White v. Regester) in which they agreed with the court’s decision.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think that gerrymandering isn’t a beneficial tactic for representing the people of a country, because it takes control away from what the people want. Instead of having citizens control what party is in control, the current political party is able assure that they can stay in power. Also, previously I strongly believed in a non partisan group doing the redistricting because it would eliminate the ability for parties to keep control of an area, but even with a non partisan group, the side that happened to lose out would accuse the non partisan group of actually being partisan. With that said, redistricting without a political affiliation would be the best way, even though the redistricting could be left to chance more than political decisions. I also think that Racial Gerrymandering is a beneficial form of gerrymandering.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Week article “How to rig elections, the legal way”, The week staff describes how parties gain an advantage by redrawing voting districts. This process of redrawing voting districts to favor one’s political party is considered gerrymandering. It creates districts that are irregularly shaped and is a legal process unless it violates the 1965 voting rights act which makes it illegal to redistrict based off of minority voters. Gerrymandering has been successful in recent years because in 2012 gerrymandered states such as Pennsylvania won 49% of the vote and took 72% of house seats. Redistricting is overseen by whoever controls the state legislature and happens every ten years with data collected from the recent census.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the next census coming up in 2020, the United States will have to analyze areas where that population has either increased or decreased and redistribute the electoral districts accordingly. Unfortunately, this will result in some form of gerrymandering to sway voting populations for either Democrats or Republicans. After the 2016 elections, it seems as those redistricting had be in favor of the Republicans so they can reclaim areas that they…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you care about your say or the people’s say when voting for your country’s leaders, then you should know that gerrymandering is an unfavorable and atrocious way that many politicians have attempted to deceive the voting system. Gerrymandering violates the US Constitution that our founding fathers worked so hard to create. It is a very inequitable thing to undertake. Therefore, I am 100% against the idea of gerrymandering as it gives many parties an unjustified dominance in many states when voting electorally, and is important as it completely ignores people’s votes. Additionally, this issue also violates the United State citizens’ individual rights, and infringes on two of the seven constitutional principles.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    From what I have learned in this class as well as what I found through research I have concluded that Texas does not regard within a democracy because of reasons I will depict within this essay. Democracy is a system of government by which the whole population is represented through elected officials. Firstly, when I took a look at the distribution of districts within our state I found that major cities had the most distribution within them but other parts of the state lacked in how districts are separated. This only tells me that in many districts around Texas there is a lack of distribution of leadership that represents the citizens properly. Secondly, we have seen a decline in voting for Texas which entails less voice for the citizens.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We use the census to show which area held the most votes for either Democrats or Republican. The common pack and crack strategic redistricting literature, what they do is they will go and study the candidate policy position, and then consider that the pack and crack is a good strategy to use, this strategy is use to put the republicans votes in the republicans districts and then they will do the same for the democrats votes. (Macdonell, Scott Taplin). Another strategy is the used partisan gerrymandering, most courts did not recognize this until the 1980s, and that they wanted to do was bring down the whole district plans. They wanted the concept of partisan gerrymandering was to turn the conversion of votes to seats, and suggested to be shaped into a legal test.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The result of this gerrymandering was an overrepresented Democratic party, inaccurately reflecting the views of our state’s citizens. It’s important to acknowledge that our court’s ruling on this issue has larger implications in the battle against gerrymandering as a whole. Gill v. Whitford 16 U.S. 1161 (2017-18) is another recent case that illustrates why gerrymandering is such a pressing question in our republic. The Republican state legislature in Wisconsin created unfair districts to ensure their majority in 2011. This redistricting resulted in the Wisconsin Republicans obtaining over sixty percent of…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ohio Ballot

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If this issue would pass it would make it more fair. It would become bipartisan, which means there are both democrats and republicans deciding the districts. Therefore voters should vote yes because it would make the districts more fair consistently, instead of changing them every…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main subject of the article is the controversy over the state’s redistricting plan and racial discrimination. Citizens and civil rights groups have started to challenge the discrimination in Texas elections. Texas is facing lawsuits over racial and political redistricting. The U.S. Supreme Court has also started to take action and implement laws to create change. The Voting Rights Act was created to prevent legal restrictions against minority redistricting.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Independent party Did you know there are many more than just two political parties? One of them is the American Independent Party. It calls itself “The fastest growing political party in C.A.” The people in this group believe in many things. God is a big factor with this party because they stand for loving each other and also being protected from any unwanted harm.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Redistricting is the political process of drawing United States electoral district boundaries, intended by the Framers to keep the electoral scales of democracy balanced. Instead, the process, as according to the Center for Voting and Democracy, “encourages the manipulation of our elections by allowing incumbent politicians to help partisan allies, hurt political enemies", and flips democracy on its head by allowing these politicians to choose their voters before the voters choose them. The article and the video adhere to the idea that redistricting allows for one political party to maintain political dominance and further political goals by drawing boundaries that protect incumbents and avoid demographic realities, rather than ensuring equal voting power and representation. However, incumbents are not always ensured a win.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The History of the Constitutional Convention In 1787, Congress realized that states governing themselves would leave the nation powerless when faced with another war. The United States had adopted the Articles of Confederation a decade prior, but the system wasn’t working. Each state was able to govern itself, and they didn’t have to abide by any regulations set by the federal government. The United States has a federalist government, meaning that the citizens are held to the laws of the state and the nation, but the federal government was left nearly powerless to enforce any type of authority. Congress had no way of being able to regulate commerce and no authority to emplace taxes.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays