Congressional District Map Essay

Improved Essays
The process of creating a congressional district map in Texas of how the people vote and where the most republicans and democrats are, as they draw the line that creates the separation, they start to see where they most likely will get the votes. A strength of gerrymandering in creating a congressional district map is that they don’t have a limit to where they can put their lines, this is an advantage because they have the freedom to create their map a little bigger when they know that they have lost a city to their vote. A weakness in gerrymandering in Texas is when the court come in and tell them that they need to change their redrawing of the map, in some cases the court has picked up cases to where they have told them to redraw the maps, because they were unfair. Also whichever party is in power, has a lot of say and control to how the districts and formed. …show more content…
We use the census to show which area held the most votes for either Democrats or Republican. The common pack and crack strategic redistricting literature, what they do is they will go and study the candidate policy position, and then consider that the pack and crack is a good strategy to use, this strategy is use to put the republicans votes in the republicans districts and then they will do the same for the democrats votes. (Macdonell, Scott Taplin). Another strategy is the used partisan gerrymandering, most courts did not recognize this until the 1980s, and that they wanted to do was bring down the whole district plans. They wanted the concept of partisan gerrymandering was to turn the conversion of votes to seats, and suggested to be shaped into a legal test. (Stephanopoulos, Nicholas

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    During primary elections, party competition heightens over voter participation as it determines the direction of political change in Texas. Up until 1960, the Democratic Party controlled nearly all Texas elections. This is because, “when one political party tends to dominate [the selection of a public official], voters who wish to participate in choosing their local public officials must vote in that party’s primary” (197). But over the half past-century, many counties have shifted from the Democratic to the Republican primary.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most people believe that the outcome of elections in Texas is decided by the voters, but in our current single-member district system of electing representatives, frequently that is not the case. Often times who will win in an election is decided long before election day, usually by those who draw the district lines. For example, if the districts in texas are drawn to be 65 percent republican then the outcome will most likely result in republicans that have the majority of seats in the legislature. In a single member district system, only one member can be elected to congress for each district, that is why drawing the district lines is by far one of the most important aspects for a party to win seats. The parties assure their representatives…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judge Justice (along with the other judges) found that The Legislative Redistricting Board did not take redistricting seriously, but instead they did what they wanted. Another issue that was brought up in the case was the multimember districts in Dallas and Bexar. Representatives in these districts are elected but minorities seem to be underrepresented. The Legislative Redistricting Board had the lines drawn so there could be political success. The decision that was made brought controversy so this case was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court (White v. Regester) in which they agreed with the court’s decision.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Week article “How to rig elections, the legal way”, The week staff describes how parties gain an advantage by redrawing voting districts. This process of redrawing voting districts to favor one’s political party is considered gerrymandering. It creates districts that are irregularly shaped and is a legal process unless it violates the 1965 voting rights act which makes it illegal to redistrict based off of minority voters. Gerrymandering has been successful in recent years because in 2012 gerrymandered states such as Pennsylvania won 49% of the vote and took 72% of house seats. Redistricting is overseen by whoever controls the state legislature and happens every ten years with data collected from the recent census.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Philadelphia Convention of 1787 was thought to have the goal of revising the Articles of Confederation, which had outlined the newly formed county’s government since the revolution. However, the first thing the representatives voted on as they entered Independence Hall was a compromise of secrecy, to let no word of their work or discussions leave the building. This decision was made in order to let the representatives preform at their best without the fear of public opinion, as well as to allow them time to totally reconstruct the government. This secrecy was condemned by some such as Patrick Henry of Virginia, who was quoted in “Are We to be a Nation” as saying “I smell a rat”. Because of this small compromise to secrecy, some of the…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I represent Alabama’s Second Congressional District, a predominantly Republican district where federalism, additional legislation, a bicameral legislature, and the Electoral College are vital to success. Covering the southeast corner of the state, Alabama’s Second Congressional District is a region marked by diversity. From large cities and major military installations to sprawling farmland and small towns, there are a variety of economic and social interests at play. Home to Maxwell-Gunter Air Force Base and Fort Rucker, this region is predominantly known for its defense facilities. As the largest employers in the district, these military installations are a great boon as they infuse money into the local economy.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas political alignment began as a strong and faithful for the Democratic Party. Through time however the political alignment switched from Democratic, to Republican, to a long lasting Democratic until turning back into the Republican alignment we have today. The particular rime and the economy of Texas was a large part of what cause these changes. To dive deeper into the changes of political alignment we have to understand who was in power at the time both in the national government and state government. In this paper I will expand on the points of: how the Democratic Party was able to gain control of the state government in Texas well into the 1970s, how Texas shifted from being an overwhelmingly Democratic state to being an overwhelmingly…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Texas constitution gives very specific rules for how our congress must be organized. It is a bicameral congress, which…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confederation Compromises

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Virginia Plan said that the number of votes per state should be determined by population, meaning states with higher population would have more votes in Congress, and states with less population would have less…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reporter Ronald Brownstein argues that there are four quadrants of Congress. Brownstein adheres to the idea that demographic factors that go beyond region play a powerful role in shaping each party’s representation in the House. The four quadrants of Congress, which include districts that have high levels of racial minorities and of educated whites, districts with high minority levels and low levels of white education, districts that have low minority levels and high white education levels, and districts with low minority levels and low white education, shape the impact of demography on parties in the House. The Democrats’ two greatest demographic strengths are the racial minorities and well-educated whites. While the Democrats drawing their…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States reapportionment and redistricting are both processes for deciding voting lines. Reapportionment is the process of reassessing the amount of congressional house seats for each state. Reapportionment is conducted through a census. This takes place every ten years, during which every person, citizen or not, is counted in each state. The process also decides the amount of votes each state gets for the electoral College.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a well functioning republic, voters elect officials whose ideals align with their own. To allow politicians with a vested interest in the way districts are drawn create congressional districts is inherently illogical, and, as the court cases in Wisconsin and our state have shown, politicians of both parties will act on this vested interest. Disproportionate representation is a result of gerrymandering when redistricting is placed in the hands of state legislatures, but it is not the only result. Packing districts also decreases political competition. The consequence of the lack of competition is increasing polarity in office.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It allows people to think that redistricting is more neutral than it is because people think of geography – as opposed to race, socioeconomic status, or political affiliation -- as a neutral factor, when in fact the geographical location of voters often intersects with various demographic…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays