Providing teachers and school staff with weapons is not efficient, instead schools should invest using the money on professional school public safety officials like school resource officers. Teachers will have a significant responsibility when handling the gun, which they should not worry about. Arming teachers and school staff and training them on learning how to handle the gun will not make them qualified to provide safety for a school full of students. This says that schools have more trust in teachers that are newly trained than highly trained police and officers. Police officers train their entire career to be prepared for dangerous situations unlike teachers who came to school to teach.
Arming teachers with guns will cost a lot of money so it can affect the budget of what the schools buy. Guns can cost the school a lot of money by providing many teachers with guns. As with the price of guns, the teachers also need to get training on guns which will cost more. A …show more content…
Teachers can misuse the weapon and potentially put a students life in danger. Schools should be considering hiring qualified police officers that have been trained to protect people instead of teachers who will have little experience. Students can also get access to the weapons which will be promoting violence. So if these situations happen, arming teachers can be a harmful way to protect a school. Arming teachers is not a suitable way to protect schools because many things can go wrong and students can get hurt. This is important because some schools already armed teachers or is considering to and this could lead to danger for the students. Arming teachers is not the ideal way to keep a school and students safe because it can lead to misuse of the weapons, promote violence, and overall can possibly put the students and school in